Yukon North Of Ordinary

News archive for September 22, 2009

Trevor is a dangerous dog: veterinarian

Trevor, the German shepherd-Rottweiler who has become the poster pet for animal lovers in the Yukon and beyond,

By Vince Fedoroff on September 22, 2009 at 2:20 pm

photo

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

WAITING GAME CONTINUES – The fate of Trevor, seen here late this morning, is still in limbo following Monday afternoon's Yukon Supreme Court hearing.

Trevor, the German shepherd-Rottweiler who has become the poster pet for animal lovers in the Yukon and beyond, is a dangerous dog and always will be, according to the behaviour specialist hired to assess him.

Veterinarian Dr. Shelley Breadner was hired jointly by the City of Whitehorse and the Humane SocietyYukon to assess the possibility of rehabilitating the dog.

Breadner came to the territory following a Yukon Supreme Court hearing between the humane society and the city over whether the dog should be put down because he bit at least two people.

Trevor came to the city after the second and most severe bite, when the people who had adopted him from the humane society took him to the city pound rather than returning him to the shelter.

They said they thought the shelter would likely try to adopt the dog out again and might not tell the new owners about his history of aggression.

At the close of the hearing, Justice Randall Wong ordered the parties to hire a behaviour specialist who would decide whether the dog could be rehabilitated and, if so, create a rehabilitation plan. The humane society would then be in charge of implementing the plan.

If the vet found the dog could not be reformed from his biting ways, the city would be responsible for putting him down under the provisions of the Animal Control Bylaw, the judge ordered.

Although Breadner’s report is not positive, it does not clearly answer the question either way.

“I would deem Trevor to be a dangerous dog,” Breadner wrote.

He perceives conflict where there is none, his interest in humans is purely “investigative” and never friendly, he does not respond to his name and will obey commands only when there is a food reward offered, she found.

He eats quickly and with intensity, although he does not respond aggressively if the food dish is taken away.

He has poor social skills, she said, and does not display signs of canine friendliness such as tail-wagging, eye contact or “dog smiles.”

During the one-day assessment, Trevor gave the vet two “level two” bites, bites which did not break the skin.

One occurred when the vet touched Trevor’s shoulder, after trying to get his attention first by calling his name then by tugging gently on his leash.

The second came when she stroked first his ear, then his cheek – attempting to make eye contact all the while – then touched his lip.

The final, and most ironic, act of aggression came toward the end of the assessment.

Mike Grieco, one of the people who has vigorously advocated for Trevor through near-weekly letters to the Star, arrived at the animal shelter to visit the dog.

Trevor ignored his patron as Grieco greeted the humans in the room but when Grieco went to pat the dog, Trevor became confrontational.

He took an aggressive body posture and curled his lips back to expose his teeth, Breadner reported. When Grieco backed away, the dog lunged at him, but was held back by the dog handler.

This was the most extreme and troubling act of aggression, Breadner said, largely because it was directed toward a person whom Trevor was familiar with and was completely unprovoked.

“These behaviours are a lifetime condition,” Breadner said. “If he perceives a conflict, he will react aggressively…. He must be under 100-per-cent control at all times.”

She went on to outline the conditions Trevor must exist under if he is to live.

Breadner said the dog must always be on a short leash with a muzzle when in public.

Wherever he lives must have a fenced yard, and the dog can only be in that yard with his owner; otherwise, he must be inside at all times.

He cannot be allowed off the leash around children or other dogs. As far as training him goes, the vet said to avoid “dog-whisperer type” methods as they will only aggravate his condition.

As city lawyer Lori Lavoie pointed out, nowhere in the report does Breadner say there is a chance of rehabilitating the dog.

“Dr. Breadner has concluded that her response is in the negative,” she said. “The steps she lays out are not about training but about public safety.”

Speaking on behalf of the humane society, Rachel Westfall objected to Breadner’s report. She said it doesn’t focus on any of the positive aspects of Trevor’s attitude, such as sniffing and licking people’s hands.

The vet said that is not necessarily friendly behaviour, especially when it is not accompanied with tail wagging. Licking, she said, is a way of investigating and asserting dominance.

The report was presented to Justice Ronald Veale yesterday.

Though he agreed with Lavoie that the doctor’s assessment was clearly negative, he said it did not definitively answer the question posed by the first court order.

Rather than try to divine her meaning, the city and the humane society should simply call Breadner and ask for the answer in front of the court, the judge concluded.

Veale extended Trevor’s stay of execution until Breadner can appear before the court, via telephone or teleconference.

CommentsAdd a comment

L. Miller-Goodall

Sep 22, 2009 at 3:52 pm

This strong, high energy dog has been kept in a small pen, not allowed to have a good run in the bigger fenced yard and muzzled all the time due to the restructions put on him, for months. Can you imagine what this has done for his behavior? I would be stir-crazy and snappy too.

When this dog first came to the shelter I walked him many times, was he strong and very active - yes, but never aggressive. At this point he was getting regular walks, could run in the large fenced area at the shelter and was not muzzled.

The article above says “He has poor social skills, she said, and does not display signs of canine friendliness such as tail-wagging, eye contact or “dog smiles.”

Are you surprised by his behaviour? From the time he was a pup he was tethered in a yard, not living in a household where manners are expected and taught, and where affection is a regular daily thing. These are things he would need to learn in a stable, consistant environment with positive reinforcement.

Solution - find him a home outside of Whitehorse - then there is not risk to anyone.

Reg Steers

Sep 22, 2009 at 4:46 pm

It would be great if the newsmedia chose to report what was said, rather than sensationalizing it. A direct quote of what was reported is follows:
Body signs included: Full pupil dilation, forward shift inb body weight, full direct eye lock, elevation of the head and nec, rise in body height and stature towards persons face, marked increase in body tension, forward tightening of the lips. ” No where does it say “curled his lips back to expose his teeth”, and in fact unless you were looking for minute details in body language, you would not have even seen any signs of agression.  And the media wonders why people are hesitant to do interviews, when there is such blatant exaggeration of the facts.  I was present during the Assessment, and during the Court session and have first hand knowledge of what transpired. So Whitehorse Star get your facts straight.

Rachel Westfall

Sep 22, 2009 at 5:01 pm

Thanks for this detailed report. Just a couple of points for correction.

- Trevor had never met Mike Grieco before the assessment. Also, Trevor didn’t lunge at Mike. The report says he wanted to follow him, but was prevented by the tight leash. Mike has walked Trevor a few times since the assessment, and has offered to help with his training.

- I didn’t object to the report in general. The Humane Society agrees with the report on principle, but we wanted to see some of the positive things Trevor did reflected in the report. Also, we wanted a clear answer to the question of whether Trevor could be rehabilitated. We didn’t ask the vet to determine if Trevor was a dangerous dog. That’s Bylaw’s job.

- Dr. Breadner described licking as controlling and attention-seeking. It seemed odd to me that such friendly-seeming behaviour would be pathologized.

- The Humane Society was granted ownership of Trevor, by court order. Whether or not this helps Trevor, it sets a precedent that may help many other animals in the future. The Humane Society sees this as a very positive outcome.

Thanks to everyone who has supported the Humane Society through this difficult case.

francias pillman

Sep 22, 2009 at 5:34 pm

Who cares about this dog? Too bad the amount of $$$ spent on this dog isn’t spent putting the money into saving other animals that seem to be forgotten.

Joseph Campbell

Sep 22, 2009 at 6:54 pm

I love animals just as much as the next person, but if this dog can’t mind his manners and continues his inappropriate behaviour, its time to send him back on death row! Its not so bad. Just a little injection and a warm feeling and when he wakes up, he’ll be in doggy heaven - or Rottweiler hell.

Joseph Campbell

Sep 22, 2009 at 7:00 pm

Lorie Lavoie: Just like a typical lawyer. Always trying to get the crap heads back on the street. I suggest she adopt the dog and take him home. See how long she can put up with it. In the meantime, how about listening to the doctor who is a specialist in this kind of work. By the way, I wonder who is paying her to get the dog sprung.

Drew Whittaker

Sep 22, 2009 at 8:03 pm

I recently buried the greatest dog ever, by my estimation.  Just establishing that I’m no dog hater.  But I’m starting to come around…

Dogs are far too prevalent, pervasive and pandered to in the Yukon and throughout Canada.  I couldn’t find local stats but in the U.S., 4.7 million people, are bitten each year and an average of 26 are killed by dogs.  I would imagine the number of injuries and deaths linked to dogs far outnumbers encounters with any other animal - though I understand that dog-human encounters far outnumber human encounters with other beasts.

Before the birth of my boy, I thought nothing of letting the dog run loose. 
Then a few incidents changed my mind:  all where dogs were free and at-large with owners who said “he’s harmless” (how the hell do you know?), when in fact the dog is snarling and acting agressive.  There was a woman at Long Lake - who’s dog was off-leash and bounding aggressively towards my 2-year old.  I picked up my boy and told him (and her) that: “Son, you need to be careful around dogs.  They can’t be trusted.”

She said that kids couldn’t be trusted around dogs.  To which I said:  “A 2-year old isn’t capable of ripping a dog’s neck out.”
Trevor’s lot may be sad and tragic—for the most part, problem dogs come from problem owners - folks not steeped in understanding dog behaviour and how to correct problem behaviour.

But spare some thought for the people that are attacked, and the kids that can’t run about freely in a park.  Do they not deserve protection?

I tend to think that there are just too many dogs; or more over too many people with dogs that can’t handle them properly.

Let’s collectively - dog-owners and others - keep an eye out on dogs and their owners.  Keep them leased and controlled. 

And to you dog owners out their - who think that “Oh my Fluffy would never hurt anyone”: be realistic.

Erika Rozsa-Atkinson

Sep 23, 2009 at 12:19 am

Dear Whitehorse Star


I am sad to see a lack of willingness the Star’s reporter displayed in her article to correctly report Travor’s court hearing. It painted a picture that jades the truth. My name is Erika Rozsa-Atkinson, a Whitehorse trainer who successfully rehabilitates aggressive dogs over 17 years in the Yukon Territory, and have training consistently for 27 years in Europe and Canada combined.
I set in the court room for 3 hours and closely paid attention to what was said. Unlike your unsuspecting readers I do know what was said in the court room. There is a code of ethics I think should be honored when informing the general public. What your reporter produced did not follow this simple core principle.

Travor also displays friendly , human oriented behaviors, he can be attentive and functional and certainly controllable.  Most of his behaviors are easily predictable. Unruly but predictable. He is an honest dog and easy to read. He communicates to his environment clearly.  Right now he is extremely frustrated due to the Bylaw ordered rules. These rules with the exception of muzzling needs adjustment to allow him physical movement on a long line.  The rules were made by people who do not have efficient knowledge of professional dog training. What this dog endures because of the lock up approach,and restrain of natural movement is abuse.

Why? He is an athletic dog, needs to move, work and live a normal life.  The City Bylaw is faulty in this aspect. The restriction plan creates aggression and does not solve anything. It does not work and never will.

Hands on Dog trainers work on the field, not out of an office. We know how to fix things and we know what to do with these types of dogs and when to do it. Our assessments are brief and we continuously assess the dog each training session. We don’t do paper work, we get the job done safely , effectively and produce results giving the animal a fair chance to learn safe ways. After each training segment we test the dog and if it fails and does not respond to any fusion method of training that can take up to 18 months,  we may suggest to put the dog down. Only after the training not before it.

I had the opportunity to speak with the man who took Travor to the shelter. I can assure you , it is no surprise this dog ended up the way he did. I would not allow this man to have a dog period. He is unfit at this time to be a responsible dog owner.

I disagree with the opinion of Travor failing the assessment.Yes, fail a test but not an assessment, again, a test should not be performed before the dog was given the opportunity to learn what he is being tested on.  Do you think it’s logical to take a drivers test without knowing how to operate a motor vehicle safely? This is not any different.

I have a very clear concept of how to harness Travor’s high strong behavior.

It is not alright to waste thousands of dollars of tax payers money on a dog. He can most likely can be fixed in his case for free. It is only a life long condition if you don’t fix it. Bylaw Services,  your rules do not protect public safety by imprisoning a dog for life. You create public fear and shot down any path to knowledge and a potential positive outcome. You would be surprised how many dogs I trained that you’ve deemed dangerous and sentenced for life on a 3ft leads. The reason why they didn’t do any harm, because they recovered and had a great life.

Travor was at my dog class today and it is clear to me that he needs to be allowed to run. It is painful to see how much this dog is suffering mentally because he is either with an incompetent owner or with great people who can not provide him with some amount of physical activity. After 2 hours of working this dog he set beside his Mr.Grieco (the man he supposedly had a conflict with at the assessment) and was surrounded by 16 other dogs in a close circle and was able to keep connected with his handler. 16 dogs together and he can still focus! Lets keep the muzzle on him, put the long line on and get him moving. With all do respect to everyone in this community, can we just use common sense? Save the money for children and people in need. Take up the offer of a local trainer who actually work in this field on a daily bases and have produced results over decades. If the doctor would test 70% of my student’s dogs she would find that Travor is a moderate case compare to what we do every day.

This court case is not only about Travor now. It is more than that. It’s is an opportunity to educate people about what is reasonable expectation towards animals. It is about the Bylaw services and the money that is wasted, the inconsistent case handling and about the gap that must be filled so these dogs are not left to react but to respond properly instead. This can be worked out and bring a better understanding and solutions for everyone, the City, the Shelter, the Public and Travor and dogs alike.

Sincerely,

Erika Rozsa-Atkinson,

FCI, WUSV, MEOE Certified Training Director

Josey Wales

Sep 23, 2009 at 6:13 am

Change the name & species from this story…and it sounds much like ANY story with the Yukon’s catch & release criminal justice bureacracy.

Too bad we can’t treat humans whom breach societies laws the same way trevor treated!

Were any charges laid & followed through with trevors original “owners” in the village whom let the chain grow in his neck?
If not why?

CJ Neville

Sep 23, 2009 at 9:10 am

Obviously and understandably, Trevor associates people with danger.  But for his caretaker, along with rehabilitation, he should be kept away from all others and be muzzled at all times for the rest of his life.

Dog Lover

Sep 23, 2009 at 5:37 pm

I’m a dog lover and it’s sad to see how it’s playing out with Trevor but what people need to see is the larger picture. From the dog’s birth it is people that lead the dog to have this type of behaviour. It is our own fault yes. However, the dog is a dangerous dog. The person they brought up to do the assessment is certified and went to school to do what shes doing as a career for the rest of her life because of her love of animals. I figured that after the report was released people wouldn’t like the decision and lash out and make stupid comments and attacks on those involved…and that means both ways! Imagine the liability for someone to take Trevor back into their home…and if during his long lifetime ahead of him he does manage to bite one person..the wrong person who would not keep it quiet to save his life…the owner of that dog would be sued for what I would imagine would be a few hundred thousand dollars. I love dogs but if my boy were bitten bu a dog deemed dangerous, I would sue that person myself for ignoring the facts and possibly putting my childs life in danger. Any one of those who jumps on the bandwagon to save this dog’s life I challenge them to personally go out and adopt this dog. Stop talking smack and put your words into action. Go out and adopt him…but I sure won’t feel sorry for you the day the dog bites the next person and you face a lawsuit.

marten

Sep 23, 2009 at 6:35 pm

Whether Trevor had met good ol’ Mike before is irrelevant, the dog still became confrontational when unprovoked.

And good god, now it’s Bylaw’s fault for not letting Trevor run around and exercise!??!!? C’mon, stop making excuses for a dog who is clearly DANGEROUS. First it was “we will abide by whatever the dog trainer says, we just want Trevor to have a second chance…” well he got his second chance. Accept it.

Thomas Brewer

Sep 24, 2009 at 10:28 am

This has dragged on long enough, wasting time and money.  Put the dog down and put some of this ongoing effort into prevention of the animal abuses that caused this situation in the first place.

Maureen Nowosad

Sep 24, 2009 at 2:08 pm

The whole Trevor story bothers me deeply - especially the truly sloppy and inaccurate reporting.  The reporters for the Star seem to be completely unable to take accurate notes and then transcribe them. And sadly not just with this story.

Shameful.  Get your facts straight and present an unbiased report. Are you a newspaper or a tabloid?

June Jackson

Sep 24, 2009 at 3:45 pm

I, as well as most people, love animals and don’t like to see them mistreated.  But, i always remember, that no matter how much I love them, they are still animals. I don’t have any answers for this situation. What is the consequence if this animal should seriously harm a human? Can these folks who are fighting to keep him alive be sued in court? If someone is hurt.. someone should pay the piper. Lots to consider here besides is it a nice doggie or not.

Doug Rutherford

Sep 24, 2009 at 3:54 pm

Before anyone hits the roof, I like dogs. This has played out far longer than it should, however. The court’s request for an assessment has been met, and, no, it does not meet some people’s wishes. That being said, it is probably time for the original decision of Bylaw to euthanize Trevor to be carried out.

francias pillman

Sep 24, 2009 at 6:10 pm

I’m glad time and time again people prove my point unequivocally. People yet again believe its more important to write 2000 word essays on a subject that affects so few. Again, I call on you people to answer my question of where are you people on matters that affect everyone? Where’s that time and effort?

Don McKenzie

Sep 25, 2009 at 10:49 am

I cannot believe how much press this dog has gotten.  A real cause-celeb.  Get the assosor on the phone and have the doctor state for the record whether the dog is dangerous or not.  If the dog is dangerous, put it down.  If I had a dog that was dangerous, it would be put down.  I could live with a dead dog on my concious, but not a dead child.

arctic_front

Sep 26, 2009 at 7:25 pm

Ok, I’ll dive into this too.  Whom ever takes this dog must have and keep liability insurance. Above and beyond householder insurance.  At least then the inevitable law suit can be covered for costs.  To the Dog Trainer, Erica, I say that if you can rehabilitate this dog, great, but you too should be held liable in a legal sense for any misdeeds Trevor may be guilty of for the rest of his life.  To the Owner, Mike, I hope you are willing to pay the piper if you insist on keeping this dog.  But for every advocate of this dog, you should all be legally bound, via written contract to share the cost and burden of the liability if Trevor bites another soul.  All of you, put your money where your mouth is. 

I sincerely hope Trevor can have a long and happy, safe, and loved existence.  If he is salvageable in anyway, good!  If he isn’t, there better be a long list of his supporters willing to be legally bound to foot the bill for the law suit.  Until that document is held on file in Supreme Court, Trevor should be put down and a vigorous court action to recover the costs of this fiasco be waged with extreme prejudice against the original owners of this dog that caused this poor animal to suffer these indignities.  I guess that will never happen because, as much as we will spend thousands to save a dog from the executioner, we won’t break faith with the tenets of political correctness to go after those responsible for this mess in the first place. What the hell is THAT all about?  Hypocrisy perhaps?  Yup, I thought so.

Francias Pillman

Sep 28, 2009 at 8:39 pm

Please close this thread.

tired

Sep 29, 2009 at 4:49 pm

please shoot this dog.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview