Yukon North Of Ordinary

Site selected for family housing project

Cost overuns and site selection continue to dog Yukon government plans to construct a 30-unit affordable family housing project in Whitehorse.

photo

Photo submitted

DEVELOPMENT COMING - The Yukon government's planned 30-unit affordable family housing project will be built off Nisutlin Drive, past the Council of Yukon First Nations building, the government announced Wednesday.Photo courtesy GOVERNMENT OF YUKON

Cost overuns and site selection continue to dog Yukon government plans to construct a 30-unit affordable family housing project in Whitehorse.

On Wednesday, Marian Horne, the minister responsible for the Women’s Directorate, announced that a block of territorial government land on Nisutlin Drive in Riverdale has been set aside for the project.

Don Inverarity, the Yukon Housing Corp. critic for the Liberal opposition, faults the plan on two fronts.

“My biggest single issue is the cost per unit is almost double what private industry can build them for ... and there doesn’t appear to be any discussion with local Riverdale residents over whether they feel they want it in their area,” Inverarity said in an interview today.

“I think there should be some public consultation but there doesn’t appear to be any consultation with the city or certainly with the residents of Riverdale.”

According to government officials, the plan to build the 30-unit building will cost between $9 million and $11 million, with $960,000 in this year’s budget earmarked for design and planning.

However, a Kwanlin Dun First Nation issued “request for expression of interest” lists a Women’s Housing Project at $13 million.

As single women comprise the largest segment in need of low-cost accommodations, it’s likely the majority of tenants would be women. But from the beginning, the government has touted the project as affordable housing catering to men or women.

Mayor Bev Buckway told the Star the matter was presented to the city’s development review committee on Tuesday. Because the proposed building meets current zoning in that area of Riverdale, public consultations or city council involvement are not required, she said.

“Certainly, everytime there’s something new built now, there’s extreme opposition,” said Buckway. She called the affordable housing unit “very positive, because we know there is a demand for it so that’s a plus.”

“It doesn’t matter what it is, people are opposed to it; that’s just a given these days,” she added.

Before construction can begin, the site must be surveyed, plans must be registered and submitted to the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board for review.

Design features in consideration include barrier-free access, child care facilities and a common area.

Funding is being provided by the Northern Housing Trust, a federal program to build affordable housing in the North.

CommentsAdd a comment

LM

Jul 11, 2008 at 10:29 am

Hopefully this continues to be a positive thing as time goes by and doesn’t turn into “the projects” type low rental slum . . .

AUGT

Jul 13, 2008 at 12:36 pm

Why are you building a slum. And I’m really tired of people using the “affordable” term all the time.  If a unit is not affordable, its “vacant”. No one would build housing with the intent that it is 100% vacant, that would be a waste of capital.  It is built to command a fair rent and with as close to 100% occupancy as possible.

Building a slum near the high schools eh?  What a disaster.

Thomas Brewer

Jul 15, 2008 at 3:16 pm

Oh great… put a bunch of kids who are likely under-supervised right next to the Yukon River.  Can’t wait to see the lawsuits after the first few kids drown.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Sorry, comments are disabled 10 days after the publication date.



Comment preview