Yukon Energy # 2

News archive for July 24, 2009

Dog’s fate may land in the courts

A group of concerned citizens has joined the Humane Society Yukon in its effort to save an abused dog from being put down.

By Elizabeth Hames on July 24, 2009 at 6:54 pm

photo

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Top: ON THE MEND - A man, who prefers to remain anonymous, shows the scar on his leg from where Trevor bit him. Bottom: FIGHTING FOR TREVOR'S LIFE - A group of concerned citizens is working with the Humane Society Yukon to release Trevor from the Whitehorse city pound. He is set to be put down next week. Star photo by KIERAN OUDSHOORN

A group of concerned citizens has joined the Humane Society Yukon in its effort to save an abused dog from being put down.

Trevor was adopted from the Mae Bachur Animal Shelter in May by Matthew Allaby and his sister, Tamara Allaby. Many dogs were available for adoption, but the siblings chose Trevor because he was “bouncy” and “playful,” they said.

Trevor was great with people for the first few weeks, but soon became aggressive and bit three people unprovoked, said Matthew.

Following the attacks, Matthew discovered Trevor was placed in the care of the humane society-run shelter after abuse by a previous owner left him with a chain collar embedded in his neck.

Last week, when Matthew Allaby signed the German shepherd-Rottweiler cross over to the Whitehorse city bylaw department to be put down, he was told Trevor would be held for two weeks.

Gerry Steers, the humane society’s president, said today the board is working with the city to release the dog into the society’s care.

“We’ve done everything we can do,” she said.

She said the humane society’s board of directors discussed taking the matter to court, but its members decided they were unable to proceed with that action.

Steers said she was contacted by a nameless private group interested in fighting for Trevor’s release in court, at their own expense.

“We are happy that there is a private group ready to go to bat for the board,” said Steers.

Kevin Sinclair, one of the members of the group, said today he will meet with a lawyer early next week to file an injunction requesting Trevor’s release from the city pound until his story can be heard in court.

Sinclair said the group is looking to present Trevor’s unique history to a judge and they will argue that Tamara Allaby breached her contract by giving the dog toher brother, since it is her name on the application and the dog adoption contract.

“It basically states that if the owner does not want the dog anymore for any reason, the dog has to be returned to the humane society,” the shelter’s administrator, Tracy Smythe, said today about the contract.

Tamara Allaby said both her and her brother’s names are on the application and they informed the shelter staff at the time of adoption that Matthew would be the primary owner of Trevor. Because Matthew didn’t have a fixed address, they used Tamara’s address for the application.

Matthew said that he didn’t want to return Trevor to the shelter, as the contract states he is required to do, because he was concerned he would be adopted out again only to continue attacking people.

Smythe said if Trevor is returned to the shelter, they won’t immediately find him another home.

“Basically, our policy is if we do have a dog, we always have a dog trainer, we assess and we work with the dog. We don’t just adopt the dog out,” she said.

“We would find somebody who’s very experienced with dogs and who would be willing to work with him.”

Tamara and Matthew said they are upset with the shelter because they specifically told the staff they didn’t want a dog that had been previously abused. They said the shelter neglected to inform them Trevor had a history of trauma.

“I had no idea. Why wouldn’t they tell you so you could at least be prepared?” Tamara asked .

Smythe said when the shelter adopts out a dog, staff provide as much information as they can to the new caregiver.

Most of their animals come to the shelter from the city pound or as strays without a history, she said, but the shelter tells new pet owners if no information on an animal is available.

Although Trevor came to the shelter from the Whitehorse city pound, all Mae Bachur staff knew about Trevor’s past.

“Everybody who came in and showed interest in Trevor was told he was the dog who was brought in with the ingrown collar,” Smythe said, adding that Tamara also would have been told that information when she adopted the dog.

Smythe said when Trevor was in the care of the humane society and volunteer dog walkers, he showed no signs of aggression, and the shelter doesn’t know what would have caused him to attack people.

“An ingrown collar doesn’t cause a dog to be aggressive,” said Smythe.

‘We would like to know what happened for him to react like that.”

“I think it was his previous abuse that caused him to be violent,” said Matthew.

Matthew’s landlord, Paul Sheridan, said Matthew and his dog were “the best of buddies. He was a pal. He wasn’t mistreated anyway, not when Matt had him.”

Sheridan was one of the people bit by Trevor. Sheridan said he was getting out of his truck when Trevor ran up to him and bit his arm.

“I’d been down there before and the dog was fine with me,” he said. “It was just that one time he launched out of the cabin.”

Sheridan said he thinks Matthew acted responsibly by turning Trevor over to city bylaw officials.

“I feel kind of sorry for the dog, but you just can’t afford having that liability hanging around,” he said.

CommentsAdd a comment

susan rogan

Jul 24, 2009 at 11:58 pm

I was going to stay out of this because it does sound like Trevor the dog is dangerous and putting him down would be reasonable.

However, I did adopt a dog 3 years ago who was due to be put down within 5 days at the Mae Bacher.  They have a ‘no kill’ policy, but this dog bit three people and beat up another dog.  I talked them into letting me take him home.

Joey is still here and he is happy and fairly well adjusted.  He has not bitten anybody and though he is still a risk due to his past behaviour, we are fairly sure that it would take a lot for him to bite someone now.  He did initiate a fight with another dog here, (Baby Jesus, the Hot Hounds champ), lost it badly, and that was the end of that.  It never happened again.

Anyway, not to make light of any of this because I would hate to be the person who advocated on behalf of a dog that went on to maul someone, but I want to say that rehabilitation does work in the right home meaning with the right people in the right location.  We are on 160 acres outside of town and have between us literally hundreds of years of experience with dogs (number of dogs x years).

With a home similar to this, Trevor might stand a chance of becoming an excellent companion, like Joey is.

On the other hand, consider that there are many other dogs needing adoption who do not have the risks that Trevor does.  However it seems completely unfair not to give this dog a few good years on earth somewhere after all he has been through.  It’s a tough one.

Red Emma

Jul 25, 2009 at 10:09 am

Forgive me for asking, but which one of those strange marks is supposed to be from a dog bite? It’s just not that obvious.

Animal Lover

Jul 27, 2009 at 1:16 pm

So this Allaby fellow has no fixed address but is adopting a dog - if that isn’t the height of irresposibility I don’t know what is.  Same for his sister for helping him to adopt.  Perhaps he should try being responsible for himself and his own stability before taking on the responsiblity for a living creature.  Now the one who suffers is Trevor - absolutely ridiculous!

Josey Wales

Jul 28, 2009 at 7:47 pm

Susan Rogan….While i get your passion for pooches, one thing regards to your comment…non related topic…
...“160 acres outside of town” really stood out to I? How did you manage to pull that piece of the pie off? Thousands of us out here are living in (————-)...awaiting the land pimps to pull their collective head out of their colon…and FREE up some REAL YARDS like in the ol’ days…before the Yukon land shortage & our NIMBYs….surpassed Japans?

sandra ohlinger

Jul 28, 2009 at 9:35 pm

Some dogs are so damaged by their previous owners they never recover, this
animal never had a chance, if he was a cute little spaniel or dachshund he would have been cut a little slack.It will take an exceptional person to turn him around.
Some people should stick to stuffies, a live animal is beyond thier ability to care for.

David Morris

Jul 29, 2009 at 11:37 am

This is a sad story and one that needs to be resolved correctly.  The shelter should be held accountable for allowing an adoption to two people that obviously have a shaky living situation with one of them not even having a permanent address.  The people that did adopt Trevor needs to be held accountable for whatever happened as they seem to be leaving out a lot of information.

Dogs can be rehabilitated and I have been part of this process before.  It takes quite a bit of understanding and patience but it is still possible.

Hopefully the courts are able to see the folly of the two people that adopted Trevor and do not put the dog down.  Imagine what would happen if humans were put down every time we committed an aggressive act.

MWebb

Jul 29, 2009 at 6:38 pm

I agree fully with David Morris and Animal Lover’s comments.  The Shelter is responsible for allowing a less than responsible person(s) adopt a pet, ie: not screening adoptees adequately, and doing proper follow up on the adoption with home visits, phone calls etc. It’s obvious this was not the dog for these people. It is always the owners fault, so they were responsible as well. Yes, hopefully the courts will see common sense and return the dog to the shelter, to have someone knowledgeable and highly experienced work with the dog to rehabilitate him. THERE IS NO PROBLEM WITH THE DOG, (as evidenced by his behavior while at the shelter) IT IS ALWAYS THE PEOPLE!

Dog Lover

Aug 2, 2009 at 4:45 pm

I am a dog lover and would love to see this dog live as much as anyone else. There are a few sad things about this whole situation however. The first is yes, we as a people have let Trevor down. It is a sad and tragic event but in the end it has to be something that may just have to happen. The dog has actually bitten a significant number of people after being released from the shelter and it’ll be interesting to hear peoples opinions after the real facts comes out in court. If Mr. Sinclair, who proposes to everyone to save this dog, perhaps he should lead the charge and either take the dog himself, who by the way would be deemed a dangerous dog and have many restrictions placed upon him, or have an idea of the what facts actually are instead of accusing the former owners and the victims of the dog bites. I give him kudos for trying to save the dog but unfortunetly he is either ill informed or does not know all the facts which will all come out in court. The shelter made some mistakes along the way adopting Trevor out and after this is all over I do hope they review their process and ensure that all dogs are safe and will go out to a loving home. The people who adopted the dog has been unfairly vilianized as well and I can say that I’m sure there are many people that would return a dog after seeing that he is a dangerous dog. Would you want to be liable for a dog biting a child unprovoked? Before you answer that, think long and seriously hard about that and the consequences of doing so. The owners did act in a reasonably and right way as to ensure the dog will not bite anyone else. As much as I would like to see the dog stay alive, the safer thing to do is to put the dog down as he is a dangerous dog and I would not want him attacking my children unprevoked. We have let Trevor down as a whole and it is only because of us and our mistrestment of animals that Trevor will be getting the raw end of the deal. No, it is not fair but sometimes because of our own actions hard choices must be made. What we must take from this is lessons to ensure this may not happen again in the future.

susan rogan

Aug 3, 2009 at 10:21 am

Hi Josey,  I purchased titled Agricultural land.  Many people ‘stake’ land that has been zoned agricultural, do the required ‘development work’ - which means clearing 55% of it and planting some ‘crop’, then they receive title.  Once they have title, they can sell it.

I did not stake the land or develop it.  It sat on the market for over a year, and I bought it.  There are currently a number of similar parcels listed, including 160 acres on Gentian Lane, two lots away from mine.  Pick up a copy of the Real Estate News at Remax, Coldwell Banker, etc.

Hope this helps.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview