Photo by Whitehorse Star
Energy Minister Scott Kent and NDP Environment critic Kate White
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Energy Minister Scott Kent and NDP Environment critic Kate White
The NDP insists it now has more evidence indicating the Yukon Party is secretly planning for a fracking industry in the Yukon.
The NDP insists it now has more evidence indicating the Yukon Party is secretly planning for a fracking industry in the Yukon.
A copy of an email circulated Tuesday by the New Democrats has deputy minister George Ross of the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources discussing a “pilot fracking/science project” in the Kotaneelee gas field with EFLO Energy Yukon.
It discusses the need to enter into an oil and gas agreement with the Liard First Nation.
The email says it’s not the government’s intention to say it is proceeding with hydraulic fracturing.
Rather, it’s a move designed to do the work so that they can keep fracking “on the table for the future (eg no moratorium etc).”
NDP Environment critic Kate White raised the email Tuesday with Energy Minister Scott Kent in the legislature.
“The minister has told us that there aren’t any applications to frack, but why won’t he tell us that he is pushing a fracking pilot project behind the backs of Yukoners?” White asked.
“Despite leaked documents and tightly scripted talking points, the Yukon Party is determined to force fracking onto a community that has clearly said no.”
Kent told the legislature the Yukon Party is working diligently on its response to the report delivered in January by the legislative committee that was tasked with examining the risks and benefits of hydraulic fracturing in the Yukon.
The government, he said, has zero-tolerance for misinformation.
Rather, it’s looking at the science and potential economic benefits the oil and gas industry can create as it prepares its response to the report.
In an interview this morning, Kent said the issue of a pilot fracking project was raised with him by a party after the committee report was filed, though he declined to identify the party.
He said it’s a suggestion worthy of further consideration since all the necessary equipment and other infrastructure was already in place at the Kotaneelee gas field in southeast Yukon.
But after evaluation, the proposal was removed from further consideration, he said.
Kent said today the Yukon Party will be delivering its response to the committee’s report within the next two weeks.
White said in an interview after question period that it’s pretty clear Premier Darrell Pasloski and his government are bent on having an oil and gas industry in the Yukon that includes hydraulic fracturing.
There was the accidental release recently of confidential documents that department officials were preparing for the minister to explain the government’s pro-development position, she said.
She pointed out how the premier made mention in his budget speech last Thursday of funding provided to Northern Cross Yukon and the Vuntut Development Corp. to explore the possibility of operating a refinery in the Eagle Plains area.
There was the lightning-fast environmental and socio-economic assessment of Yukon Energy’s new LNG generating plant, said White.
Now, she said, there’s the email.
White said EFLO Yukon, which purchased the Kotaneelee gas field in 2012, is on record as saying it wants to explore opportunities in the gas field using unconventional drilling methods – fracking.
“So the question has always been what has the government promised them, what has the Yukon Party promised them?” she said.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (11)
Up 1 Down 0
Pedro does not understand reality on Apr 14, 2015 at 6:53 pm
Drillers know the facts. Not people that have opinions that are not based on fact or science, just talking mouth pieces that say nothing that is believable, like the anti fracking, NDP and Liberals.
Up 8 Down 4
Been there done that on Apr 13, 2015 at 11:03 pm
He said it’s a suggestion worthy of further consideration since all the necessary equipment and other infrastructure was already in place at the Kotaneelee gas field in southeast Yukon."
Kent is talking through his hat here because in order to frack you need a fracking crew which has maybe ten specialized trucks, you need your water set up and stored in 400bbl tanks, testing crew, safety hands, consultant, N2 and Co2, sand trucks, service rig crew, I hope I haven't left anybody out but, you get the picture. This fracking setup costs hundreds of thousands of dollars/day and does not sit around on stand-by. They come in, do it and gone to the next site. No messing around like there is in the legislature.
Anybody that's been around for awhile knows you can't trust anyone from the Yukon Party past morning coffee break.
Up 5 Down 10
Pedro on Apr 13, 2015 at 6:02 pm
Some of the pro-fracking arguments are scraping the barrel now. 'Have you ever known a driller?' asks one. Well, not intimately, but then again I have never known a pedophile either, but i get the feeling I wouldn't want to either or need to know one in order to generally disapprove of what they do.
Up 8 Down 0
Pro Science that's already in place under federal restrictions in Canada on Apr 12, 2015 at 4:32 pm
That is already in place under federal restrictions in Canada starting with the tar ponds in Cape Breton.
Up 38 Down 21
Of people making comments that are against fracking what experience do you have on Apr 10, 2015 at 9:08 am
People of the anti development/fracking what knowledge do you have in the subject of fracking? None. Have you ever been at a well site and seen them at work? None. Have you ever known a driller?
Up 23 Down 35
pedroferrero on Apr 9, 2015 at 11:53 am
north of 60 - If you don't understand the risks of wellbore interaction through the hydraulic fracture process, then please Google the phrase 'wellbore communications' and learn all about the documented cases of an 'inactive' bore' being reactivated by stimulation from a proximal actively drilled bore. Even a capped bore is not at risk from lateral communications at depth and resultant fugitive releases. That's called science, neither folklore nor hearsay.
Up 33 Down 1
ProScience Greenie on Apr 9, 2015 at 11:43 am
Perhaps there is one thing the Yukon could do right away while the fracking debate rages on is to make it law that for all drilling done that involves the use of drilling fluids/muds, whether it be for water wells, diamond drilling, oil and gas, geothermal or whatever, that all compounds used in the fluids be disclosed. Of course that includes fracking fluids.
As far as I know most mining companies have been doing that with their diamond drilling contractors for years so why not just make it so across the board? Full disclosure shouldn't be a big deal. If a company doesn't want to do it they can move on elsewhere.
Small common sense and reasonable steps surely beat this sad ideological war we see between the 'anti-everything' and the 'drill, baby, drill' camps that seem to be all about pitting Yukoner against Yukoner.
Up 49 Down 26
NDP No Development Please on Apr 9, 2015 at 8:58 am
NDP are totally against the Yukon having an economy. So if you want a job for your children don't vote NDP because they do not want any development in the Yukon. It is to bad they can't get it.
Up 40 Down 20
north_of_60 on Apr 8, 2015 at 7:11 pm
It's no secret, of course hydraulic fracturing will be used on some wells in the Yukon. There is no scientific prof it causes any problems in new wells. The only opposition is folklore and hearsay, that's not science.
So called "fracking" has become the scapegoat for every case of petroleum contamination. However, in nearly every case, detailed investigation shows that hydraulic fracturing is not the cause.
Of course that doesn't matter to most people who get their 'education' from their facebook friends. Criticism of "fracking" is miles wide and millimetres deep. Facts are not important to most of them; it's only about what they 'feel'. Their minds are made up and they don't want any inconvenient facts confusing their preconceived notions.
Anyone opposed to "fracking" shouldn't be using any petroleum products in their lives, otherwise they would be nothing but greenwashed hypocrites.
Up 55 Down 59
BattleOfAusterlitz on Apr 8, 2015 at 3:24 pm
Ignoring the electorate is the optimum strategy for ensuring that your chances of re-election will never rise above zero. Great work Napoleon Kent !
Up 44 Down 24
ProScience Greenie on Apr 8, 2015 at 3:11 pm
Never thought I'd say it but it is time we elect one or two reasonable Green Party MLAs here in the Yukon so we can start having some intelligent conversations about the economy and the environment without the conspiracy theories, exaggerations and 100% anti-development attitude we see from the Opposition. That said, the Yukon Party should wake up and realize that Yukoners want more openness and transparency.
Of all the players, the Vuntut Development Corp. will likely be the most trustworthy when it comes to hydrocarbon development.