Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Pictured Above: DAVID GILBERT

Mounties' role in reality show fades to black

The Yukon RCMP have officially pulled the plug on a reality TV show set to focus on Yukon Mounties.

By Ashley Joannou on August 29, 2013

The Yukon RCMP have officially pulled the plug on a reality TV show set to focus on Yukon Mounties.

The show began filming Aug. 10 – much to the dismay of many community groups concerned about using policing as a form of entertainment.

The production was suspended six days later.

Today, police announced they would be pulling out of the project completely.

In an interview with the Star, the RCMP's David Gilbert said police still believe there's value in showing the public a behind-the-scenes view of their work.

But the overwhelmingly negative public response shows a television series was clearly not the right path to take.

"Fundamentally, we still think there was merit in the idea,” he said.

"This was not the right time, and maybe not the right way, but there are still stories that need to be told, and they may not be the ones members of the public were concerned about.”

When news broke that an American production company, True Entertainment, was going to be filming Mounties in the territory, community groups raised concerns about the exploitative nature of television.

One incident two weeks ago, where a woman was arrested downtown with cameras rolling, was witnessed by former Yukon MP Audrey McLaughlin, who questioned the value of the show.

Based on the public reaction to the filming, "this way clearly wasn't going to work,” Gilbert said.

The police were able to walk away from the show without any penalty because of a termination clause that was deliberately written into the contract during the negotiations, he added.

Police had the right to walk away, scot-free, for any reason.

"As a public institution, we couldn't be bound by something that the public wouldn't support,” Gilbert said.

As for the small amount of footage already filmed, Gilbert said there wasn't enough collected to be very useful.

"Some of the situations the public was reacting to would never have made it through the editing process,” he said.

Under the agreement, the police were able to view any episodes prior to air and request changes.

Anyone filmed for the show was also required to sign a waiver. If the document wasn't signed, the footage would never be seen, the production company insists.

Gilbert said the same rules still apply to anything that was caught on camera even though the show has been stopped.

That means if the production company wants to use the footage for any other project, the RCMP's approval is still required.

"Any material that was shot isn't going to be used,” Gilbert said.

There are lessons to be learned from what happened.

"Maybe we moved too quickly,” he said.

"We recognize the value in taking more time to help people understand what we were trying to do.... Some of it was misperceived.”

Even now, Gilbert said, calling the project a reality show leads to the wrong sorts of comparisons to some of the trashier shows on television.

He insists this show was planned to be more of a documentary series highlighting the work done by police in the Yukon, and other positive stories.

Comments (9)

Up 0 Down 0

piper on Sep 3, 2013 at 8:36 pm

Now the criminals can continue to remain a mystery to all of us & practice their occupation in peace. Oh no lets not put any cameras on them .

Up 0 Down 0

B. Foster on Sep 1, 2013 at 12:27 am

First Responder...

Were you reading some other comment than the main one I wrote?

I make no claim to "saving" anyone and further no comment as to the system itself....other than there are those tasked with dealing with various aspects of policing and the various reasons there is a need for policing at all.

Why are there no first response shows out that chronicle auto wrecks or raw footage of violent and serious crime...rape victims, those affected by murder or human mutilation. The footage is out there to be sure thanks to the internet but apparently there is a line that primetime will not cross yeah? Who draws the line of what is acceptable for entertainment purposes? Is it you or does it become someone else simply because if it's on at dinnertime then it must be "ok" right? Who makes the distinction? I do....

My comment was plainly that the issues at hand should not be for the sheer entertainment of others and brought to you and I by the same mentality that sensationalizes and cherry picks tasty bits of what are serious and ongoing issues.

If you think that there is a valid reason that such a production should exist than let that need itself become the impetus for the production...not because some producer wants to ride the wave of popularity before the fad dies away and they are on to whatever the latest popular production is that panders to base emotions or compulsions better left alone.

If there is a need to make a production such as we are discussing then commission such a production on that basis....that there is a need for it. Produce it locally. Include ride alongs and include their perspectives of what they saw as an added insight.

Do not let that need be because some city slickers from new york with ratings and money on their minds come up here and tell us what we need because look who else has done it and how "popular" it has become elsewhere.

Consider why shows like this are popular, is it because they give us a glimpse into what law enforcement must go through in the course of their duties or it is more likely because it's fun to watch people at their worst or most unfortunate being spotlighted for you and I to laugh at and point fingers?

I've watched them also, I see the compulsion...I've found it funny and entertaining. I know it's not my best side so I try to go do something else I, got lots to do.

You raise many valid points. In my opinion none of them are addressed by jumping into bed with some crass production from a company called "True Entertainment".

Up 0 Down 0

Clayton Johns on Aug 31, 2013 at 3:13 am

So if you get Harassed by the R.C.M.P. for no reason, that makes you a criminal? Like I said before, they would of ordered the cameras off while being themselves and only turned them on when they look good! Glad they done away w/this!

Up 0 Down 0

First responder on Aug 31, 2013 at 2:42 am

B. foster your simplistic view of this situation is typical for this town, and one of the main reasons we have such a high crime rate and indifferent population.

You think your "saving" people by maintaining this horrible system we have in place in this town for dealing with the addicts and victims of crime.

Emergency managers and government social architect's refuse to accept our system here is a failure. Mainly because the RCMP and EMS are gagged from letting out the truth of how bad it is here. Why is it acceptable that we sometimes only have 3 RCMP on duty at any given time ( even though their work load and violent crime stats are equal to much bigger cities and bigger detachments). Why is it ok to allow addicts to fill/ plug up our medical system on a weekly almost daily basis?

The right wingers won't build the care facilities needed to relieve the pressure on emergency workers.

The left wingers hold the emergency workers to account for lack of systems and support addicts and victims of crime have.

Both sides prefer to have their head stuck in the sand on these issues rather than accept that this so called utopian Whitehorse we live in, has some serious problems and people that can't be fixed with hugs and smudging ceremonies.

Up 0 Down 0

B. Foster on Aug 30, 2013 at 9:09 am

Dear Jackie,

Please see previous comment....now back to Jerry for you...

Up 0 Down 0

Jackie Ward on Aug 30, 2013 at 8:10 am

Boo hoo. You guys won. What did you accomplish? Why do you guys care so much about people being filmed? You don't care the rest of the time. I feel sorry for the RCMP. You clowns wrecked something that could be very positive for the RCMP. You are not some kind of victim if you were filmed after being arrested. You are a criminal and we have a right to know what goes on in our neighborhood.

Up 0 Down 0

B. Foster on Aug 29, 2013 at 11:07 pm

Derp....please.

There's plenty of "cop" type shows on the talking box to satisfy even the most ardent or conversely, jaded Jerry Springer fan.

I think what you might have been trying to say was now our local law enforcement can go back to dealing with crime in general as well as the crime that spins off from addiction and substance abuse issues.

Awesome that it can continue to be done without the added burden of being followed around by shallow crass producers and camera crews from the south claiming there mission statement is to help the public appreciate what those that enforce the law go through every day when in reality it is pandering to voyeuristic turpitude in the name of ratings and money.

I mean come on...the production company's name is "True Entertainment" for gawd sake. Your "entertainment" at others misfortune / expense is repugnant.

You wanna see what they go through? The dockets are all posted at the courthouse for your viewing pleasure...go sit in on a few cases.

I applaud this decision...well done. Keep it real.

Up 0 Down 0

June Jackson on Aug 29, 2013 at 9:08 am

Well..lots of people in the Yukon wouldn't want their face on film into perpetuity. The majority of police responses are to drunks and junkies...lots of both here.. Walmart had the highest amount of shoplifting per capita of any Walmart in Canada..maybe in North America, so lots of theft here too..

I'd like to see a reality show that looks at daily life.. going to school, going to work, working out, playing in the parks, at CGC, that says we're just like everyone else..except with fresher air and cleaner water.. but, that 99% of us are decent, honest people probably isn't as interesting as first paragraph would have been.

Up 0 Down 0

Derp on Aug 29, 2013 at 7:42 am

Now we can all go back to pretending we don't have any crime or addiction problems.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.