Miner laments huge loss of time and money
Nicolai Goeppel is feeling floored by Monday’s recommendation from an assessment board not to allow the development of his placer mine on Judas Creek.
Nicolai Goeppel is feeling floored by Monday’s recommendation from an assessment board not to allow the development of his placer mine on Judas Creek.
In an interview this morning, the born-and-raised Yukoner was obviously still grappling with the question of: what now?
What of the $500,000 he estimates he’s invested in time and money over the last five years on grassroots exploration to ensure the dream he was chasing was real, was economically viable?
Last year alone, there was $200,000 in assessment work after he had found a partner who believed in his results and was willing to invest his own time and money, and his excavator for more advance exploration work last summer.
What of the other placer claims in the area he spent morning ’til night staking, cutting and putting up claim posts?
“Through this whole application process, I started to realize there is a history of projects not going through in this area,” he told the Star.
“I just wish it was withdrawn before I started putting in all this time and money.”
“... I am pretty disappointed and not proud to be a Yukoner today, and I never thought I would say that.”
The Teslin office of the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board recommended Monday that Geoppel’s placer mine project not be allowed.
The assessment board found while most environmental impacts could be addressed by imposing conditions, there was no way to manage the disturbance and negative impacts the project would have on the protected Carcross caribou herd.
First Nations were opposed to the project, largely out of concern for the caribou.
Environment Yukon recommended it not be allowed to proceed out of concern for the caribou, as the project area was within the range used frequently by the caribou.
The board’s recommendation to reject the application has been forwarded to the Yukon’s mineral resources branch and the branch now has 30 days to accept, reject or alter the recommendation.
The proposal did receive some support in correspondence filed with the board during the public input period but there was far more opposition.
Much of it focused on concerns for the caribou herd. The herd has been the subject of a recovery program for nearly 30 years.
Historical records show the Carcross herd once numbered in the thousands, so numerous that the hills looked alive as the caribou moved through.
The herd was estimated in 1992 at 400 animals, an all-time low. Today, it’s estimated at 775 animals.
Goeppel’s claims are on the east side of the Alaska Highway about 4.5 kilometres north of Jake’s corner.
The 27-year-old Goeppel said he spent 10 summers on the family placer mine at the end of the Freegold Road west of Carmacks. He and his brother, his mom and dad, grandparents all worked the operation.
It’s been his dream to mine for gold, said the recent university graduate in geology.
Goeppel found what he was looking for on Judas Creek. He started off with a gold pan, graduated to digging test pits by hand and eventually using the excavator for more advanced exploration.
“This could be the find of a lifetime for me.”
The proposal called for a small operation with minimal impact, he pointed out, adding there would be no camp because the placer ground is within driving distance, no need for major fuel storage. The water discharge would be minimal, if not zero.
There are existing roads in the area.
Goeppel said the Carcross caribou herd shares its winter range with 80 per cent of the Yukon’s population, the same area as Whitehorse.
“If this doesn’t go through, nothing will,” he said. “I thought this was a straightforward application.”
Goeppel said he and a buddy have already built a sluice box.
As for what to do now, he’s still not sure, he said.
Does he continue doing assessment work on adjacent claims to the keep the claims in good standing with the mining recorder?
He said he would like to re-apply, but everything is so uncertain today.
“It is pretty hard to spend all that time and money and then turn your back on it and cut your losses,” Goeppel said.
“It’s even hard to say that.”
The geologist said prospectors and miners don’t pick where the gold is. They have to find it, and he found it.
Colleagues in the business whom he’s spoken with are wondering if there is any hope of developing anything in the area.
The assessment board’s Teslin office is scheduled to release its recommendation on another mining proposal later today or tomorrow.
A company has applied to do advance exploration work on Jubilee Mountain, west of the Atlin Road.
Many of the same concerns over caribou raised in Geoppel’s application have been raised in the Jubilee Mountain application.
Comments (12)
Up 19 Down 20
where did the project proposal go? on May 12, 2016 at 1:00 pm
I googled the project and can no longer find Goeppel's project. But I did read it over when it was at the review stage and it did not strike me as minor. There was an enormous amount of water slated to be used, and likewise a shocking (to me) volume of earth to be moved. It was quite a long stretch of creek that was slated to be destroyed as well, then somehow put back together again as the project moved along chewing up the ecosystem looking for gold.
If this constitutes a tiny little placer operation, what the H is going on out there that makes this small?
I would like to be able to review the project again to give specifics but like I said, everything has been removed from the YESAB site and a google provided no results.
For those saying it's just a tiny little thing being proposed, could you provide the details please? I did not send in a comment but was thinking of it due to the scale of the destruction that was planned.
Up 33 Down 12
Joe Boyce on May 12, 2016 at 10:57 am
If there is concern for caribou summer or winter range around Whitehorse I think the biggest threat within 100 km of town is disturbance from unregulated snow machine use in the winter.
YESAB and Environment Yukon should step back and look at cumulative effects from human activities when they attempt to manage threatened species.
Up 34 Down 7
Change the regulations on May 12, 2016 at 8:15 am
This is exactly why the mining land use regulations need to change. If someone is going to invest lots of time and money into a dream, they should know up front whether they are going to get approval to use and affect (sometime negatively) public resources.
There is no way that a proponent large or small should be able to hold the system hostage by saying look what I have already invested. Get approval before investment, makes sense to me.
Up 33 Down 17
Polka Time Ace on May 11, 2016 at 10:03 pm
This miner sounds simply caught up in a poor me scenario, or maybe he is simply helping launch a political campaign? There is no way that someone spent a half million dollars before they thought to go through Yesab.
However, Yesab is clearly missing the point of the Socio-economic part of this assessment. Mining is Yukon. Yesab should be guiding projects towards optimal operating methods, and promoting world class innovation in the mining sector. They should not be engaged in petty blocking of mining activities.
Up 25 Down 33
jc on May 11, 2016 at 6:30 pm
Sue! They have no right to shut down a man's living. Getting tired of these nonproductive people destroying the livelihoods of the very people who support them out of their sweat and taxes.
Up 28 Down 21
Just Sayin' on May 11, 2016 at 5:43 pm
If YESAB had to return a portion of the monies people invested into projects, I bet you numerous decisions would be different. I am sure in the EA the First Nations concern carried more weight then anyone out there. Perhaps, the Alaska Highway should be closed to protect this herd and no hunting.
Up 69 Down 24
Max Mack on May 11, 2016 at 5:02 pm
". . .there was no way no way to manage the disturbance and negative impacts the project would have on the protected Carcross caribou herd."
I question whether YESAB has "proven" that there will be negative impacts, or whether it has simply imposed an undue and unreasonable standard of care on the basis of anecdotal evidence.
"Zero impact" is unattainable, unless we ban all human activities; perhaps that is what YESAB hopes to achieve.
Up 33 Down 82
Jack Colby on May 11, 2016 at 4:43 pm
No sympathy for this guy - $500,000 could have been better invested in so many other ways.
Up 73 Down 24
BnR on May 11, 2016 at 4:30 pm
Jack Malone
Really? Oh come on. If the reason his application was rejected is critical Caribou habitat, then shut down all the human activities in the area. And using the same metric, Casino should be rejected right now out of hand, as the Klaza herd will be severely impacted. I'm guessing the NIMBY's were hard at work on this one. Jack, did you even bother to pull the publicly accessible YESAB application? This project is tiny. A YG gravel pit would have a larger impact.
Up 74 Down 22
Josey Whales on May 11, 2016 at 3:48 pm
I am a conservationist but think that this mine can operate with some thoughtful planning and mitigation.
I feel sorry for this young miner. Consider the impact of vehicles running down caribou on the Alaska highway in this area vs a summer mining operation run with people who are willing to work towards having a low environmental footprint- there is no comparison between these tow activities, the highway is a major threat to the caribou.
The highway will kill caribou, the mine will not be operating in winter, it can operate with minimal impact to caribou, let the mining operation go ahead.
Up 38 Down 83
Jack Malone on May 11, 2016 at 3:28 pm
No sympathy from me for Geoppel. He should have know that he was in the middle of critical habitat for the Southern Lakes Caribou herd. Probably not the best location for a placer mining operation! Stop blaming everyone else and wise up, buddy.
Up 23 Down 13
BillW on May 11, 2016 at 3:27 pm
I think Wolf Creek has some open ground.