
Photo by Pierre Chauvin
JUST CHECKING – Auxiliary constables Craig Brooks, left, and Ron Bramadat, right, check motorists to detect drunk drivers last Friday on Hamilton Boulevard.
Photo by Pierre Chauvin
JUST CHECKING – Auxiliary constables Craig Brooks, left, and Ron Bramadat, right, check motorists to detect drunk drivers last Friday on Hamilton Boulevard.
Photo by Pierre Chauvin
A WATCHFUL EYE – Auxiliary Const. Ron Bramadat takes part in a roadside checkpoint last Friday on Hamilton Boulevard.
“I’m stopping anybody with a pineapple between their legs,” the RCMP officer tells the car occupants, spotting one of them with the fruit.
“I’m stopping anybody with a pineapple between their legs,” the RCMP officer tells the car occupants, spotting one of them with the fruit.
The mood is cheerful, less so is the reason Cpl. Shawn Pollard is stopping vehicles on a cold Friday night on Hamilton Boulevard: to fight the territory’s endemic rates of drunk driving.
In 2013, the Yukon earned the not-so-honourable distinction of being the worst place in Canada for impaired driving offences, once the statistics are adjusted for the population.
That year, 386 charges were laid across the territory – more than one a day.
Today is National Impaired Driving Awareness and Enforcement Day.
Yukon RCMP have said they will be out in force today checking for impaired drivers.
It’s 7:20 p.m., Pollard and five other officers have set up a roadside checkpoint on Hamilton Boulevard, on the right lane when going to Granger from the Canada Games Centre.
They’re accompanied by four volunteers from the local chapter of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD).
Blinking lights on the ground announce the checkpoint.
Three police cruisers’ emergency lights are also on, reverberating into the reflective vests.
Each officer is in charge of talking to a driver, checking for signs of alcohol consumption.
Roadside checkpoints happen year-round but a couple of weeks before Christmas, Whitehorse RCMP are making themselves more visible to remind people not to drink and drive.
Cars are lining up on Hamilton Boulevard. The checkpoint is creating a small traffic jam.
Drivers though are pretty co-operative, often nodding their head at the MADD volunteers, chit-chatting with the officers once they’ve checked for alcohol consumption.
At 8:15, the officers pack up to move the checkpoint’s location.
So far, they haven’t caught a single impaired driver.
It’s still early in the evening, which could explain it.
“Not necessarily, not in Whitehorse,” says Pollard.
In Whitehorse, there is no ideal time to catch impaired drivers, he says.
High rates of alcoholism means some people are constantly drinking – and driving.
At his previous posting in Carcross, he would catch of lot of impaired driving at 8 a.m., still drunk from the night before.
Pollard has been in the force for 26 years, and spent the last seven in Whitehorse.
He knows a lot about impaired driving.
“It’s perfect up here, the warm air (in the car) will blow any alcohol smell right in your face,” explains Pollard.
He has moved the checkpoint to Centennial Street in Porter Creek, parallel to the Alaska Highway.
Pollard remembers a few years ago a couple people had set up a Facebook page called “Pig Watch” to share checkpoint locations.
“It doesn’t bother me,” said Pollard about people informing each other of ongoing checkpoints.
“The more the word is getting out, the better.”
The checkpoint is fairly well hidden.
This time it’s set up to intercept cars going in both directions.
It’s about 8:30 p.m. and there isn’t too much traffic, but the officers are still vigilant.
At around 8:45 p.m. a SUV truck, a couple hundreds metres from the checkpoint, turns around.
Const. Shean Kidd jumps in his police car, catches up to the driver and pulls him over.
The driver is thought to be impaired.
Meanwhile, at the checkpoint, the officers have caught a driver without his licence.
Pollard is talking to another driver when he asks him to step out of his car.
If officers suspect a driver may be impaired, they can ask him or her to take a roadside screening test.
The screening device will give a “warning” if the blood alcohol level is between .05 and .08 grams of alcohol per 100 millilitres is found in their blood, and a “fail” if over 0.08.
The legal limit in Canada is set at .08, but drivers can be charged for less than that if they’re already impaired as everybody has different tolerance to alcohol.
If he or she is over the .08 limit, the person will be brought back to the RCMP detachment for an evidentiary test – results of the breathalyzer will be admissible in court.
The man is directed to a cruiser’s back seat.
The screening device registers a “warning.”
The man is issued a warning and a 24-hour driving suspension, while trying to figure out if friends can pick up his car.
If he can’t get his car picked up, the police will call a tow truck.
That means at least $500 of fees for towing and storing the vehicle overnight, Pollard explains.
The MADD volunteers are still there – it’s been over two hours since the operation started.
It’s only -10 C but a vicious cold wind is blowing. And unlike the officers, MADD volunteers don’t move around a lot – they’re mostly holding signs encouraging people to refrain from drinking and driving.
“We’re always trying to bring awareness of how high the stats are,” says Amanda Price, president of the local chapter.
At the courthouse on Second Avenue and Wood Street, daily dockets show what cases are scheduled for that day.
They list the name of the accused, the section of the Criminal Code related to the alleged offence and other details.
Impaired driving – section 253 – appears most days.
In Whitehorse, MADD volunteers have been coming out to roadside checkpoints for the past 10 years.
“MADD is not anti-alcohol – we’re never discouraging people from enjoying the holiday season, it’s just planning ahead,” she says.
“If you’re going to drink, don’t drive.”
Every couple of years, MADD Canada issues a report taking a global look at impaired driving across the country.
The last report didn’t even include statistics from the three territories because of how bad they were, she explains.
It’s 9:20, and Pollard decides it’s time for a dinner break.
Two officers have to stay behind – they’re waiting to wrap up the impaired driving investigation Const. Kidd started.
An impaired driving investigation can easily take two hours, Pollard confirmed.
While waiting for their food to arrive at a local restaurant, the officers chat about the worst cases they’ve encountered: twice, three times or even four times the legal limit.
In some cases, the blood alcohol levels are so high, an average person would be clinically dead if he or she were to drink that much.
But alcoholics and some others have such a high tolerance, when stopped at a roadside checkpoint, they can appear to be functioning quite well, Pollard says.
In reality, while they’re just good at keeping their state of utter inebriation invisible, they will still be suffering from slow reflexes and poor co-ordination that can induce terrible accidents.
That night, from 7 p.m. until 2 a.m., the RCMP officers laid a total of four impaired driving charges.
The officers will be back – they have to, given the situation.
“(Impaired driving) creates a lot of troubles, a lot of sad stories,” Pollard says.
“And it doesn’t seem to be going away anytime soon.”
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (13)
Up 8 Down 6
north_of_60 on Dec 9, 2015 at 6:02 pm
Why don't police use proven methods to test for actual impairment?
Some people are impaired with less than .08 alcohol or by any number of other drugs legal and illegal.
Test for an impairment to drive, regardless of the cause.
Up 21 Down 29
Really? on Dec 7, 2015 at 11:58 pm
So, according to Max Mack, people should be able to drink and drive, just so long as they don't have a reading over .08. I TOTALLY DISAGREE. It's the fact that you are responsible for every other life on the road, not only your own, that leads the mature driver to not just have one, or two, or however many. Judging by all the dislike comments of common sense posts, I just can't figure out why the Yukon is enamoured with its alcohol. There's ski-dooing, skiing, running, hiking, canoeing, reading, plays, music concerts….my life is full and drinking is boring. Drinking and driving is narcissistic. Oh…and I'll say it again…drinking and drugs are boring. I grew up here and I'm a long time Yukoner. When people say there's nothing else to do, really?
Up 45 Down 27
LD on Dec 7, 2015 at 8:40 am
This was a really well written article- I enjoyed reading it.
I like the check stops - police officers have always been friendly with me (and I am definitely a visible minority) but I've also never given them reason to not be. I find it nice to have that reminder there to drink responsibly - plan ahead. I personally don't drink and drive at all; if I plan on having a drink I make arrangements for another way home as I know my body and how it reacts to alcohol intake. To me that's all part of responsible drinking which is what MADD stands for.
Up 7 Down 12
June Jackson on Dec 6, 2015 at 9:13 pm
Mr. Mack, I appreciate your comments and I understand what you are trying to convey. That drinking does not necessarily mean impaired. Please go read this page.. it was done by Brown University.. factual, not judgmental.
http://www.brown.edu/Student_Services/Health_Services/Health_Education/alcohol,_tobacco,_&_other_drugs/alcohol/alcohol_&_your_body.php
Up 16 Down 15
Politico on Dec 6, 2015 at 4:27 pm
I like the presumption of guilt until proven innocent, all without representation or judicial oversight!
Up 22 Down 11
Stu Whatman on Dec 6, 2015 at 3:48 pm
This is a very good effort. Do they have detection devices which can detect pot and other drug impairment including prescription drugs?
If they slow down drinking and driving there is still a very large amount of impairment that may be undetected here in Yukon.
Up 56 Down 53
Max Mack on Dec 6, 2015 at 3:16 am
Unlike the glowing praise offered by others for MADD and the likes of Cpl. Pollard, I disagree with their zealotry and their attempts at alcohol prohibition. Drinking and driving is only dangerous when a person is impaired. Under the Criminal Code, that is .08. Anything less than that is not impairment under the Criminal Code. Roadside suspensions are illegal under the Charter and should not be permitted.
But, the zealots are convinced that any consumption of alcohol is equivalent to impairment. This is not substantiated by accident histories, statistics or research (although there is growing pressure on research scientists to "prove" that any alcohol consumption = impairment).
This statement proves my point: “If you’re going to drink, don’t drive.” In other words, drinking = impairment. This is the eventual goal that the zealots have in mind, and they have already successfully managed to convince many people that "drunk driving" is equivalent to having a drink and then (eventually) driving.
I agree that people should not drive drunk. I agree that the RCMP should arrest and charge people that are legally drunk. However, I do not agree with the broad-brush abuse of the Charter by police during roadside stops, nor do I agree with the mentality that any alcohol consumption = impairment.
Up 65 Down 45
Grouch d'North on Dec 5, 2015 at 9:52 am
Kudos to the RCMP and the many MADD volunteers for braving the elements to find the ignorant and deadly people who still think it is acceptable to drink and drive. I hope the media continues to inform us of who these miscreants are by name so the public will know who is putting their safety at risk.
Up 34 Down 32
Jackie on Dec 5, 2015 at 9:02 am
Fantastic writing. You transported me out there with the police. Giving this important topic such care elevates the paper. These stories have unfortunately been done and done to the point of becoming cliché, but you didn't fall into that trap. Kudos!
Up 23 Down 30
June Jackson on Dec 5, 2015 at 8:37 am
In January 2015, almost a year ago, the Star printed these stats:
http://www.whitehorsestar.com/News/for-impaired-driving-yukon-had-dubious-title-throughout-2013-stats Impaired drivers didn't learn anything this year.
They didn't have to..this is a quote from the MADD legislation and the URL if anyone would like to read all of it.
” However, the Criminal Code defines these terms in vague, open-ended language which leaves judges with broad discretion"
With judicial discretion Yukon judiciary nearly always takes the light end, rarely handing out the harder sentences. Outside of laying out some cash, there is rarely anything harder. Even if you kill someone, you might get an ankle bracelet, maybe a few days in jail to sober up in.. but for the most part there are only light deterrents. MAYBE you lose your license for a year, but not your vehicle..Other countries got real serious about impaired driving..
http://webpages.charter.net/ricknet/duilaws.htm I enjoyed this read.. one country sends the wife to jail as well if her husband is caught drunk driving.
http://www.madd.ca/media/docs/MADD_Canada_Sentencing_Framework_FINAL.pdf
The Conservative Party had new, tougher legislation on the table which would have: The Dangerous and Impaired Driving Act would:
- Eliminate the ‘bolus drinking’ defence where the driver claims heavy drinking just before driving meant alcohol was still being absorbed when stopped
- Limit the ‘intervening drink’ defence where the driver claims drinking after driving was to blame
- Harsher penalties for repeat offenders
- Doubling maximum penalties for indictable offences without bodily harm or death from five years to 10 years imprisonment, and from 18 months to two years for summary conviction
- Making maximum penalties for causing bodily harm 14 years imprisonment and increasing mandatory minimum penalties for indictable offences from a $1,000 fine to 30 days imprisonment on summary conviction and 120 days on indictment
- Increasing mandatory minimum penalties for impaired driving and refusal offences causing death from a $1,000 fine to 6 years in prison.
http://www.lfpress.com/2015/06/17/tougher-drunk-driving-law-lauded--but-it-might-hinge-on-a-federal-tory-victory
Is it cost? Personally, I think if you can afford to drink, you can afford the $93. to taxi to WhistleBend, or the $37.00 to Porter Creek.. (estimates given me by a local taxi company).
Any impaired drivers reading.. please reply.. Why would you rather risk killing someone than calling a friend? Taking a taxi? Catching a ride with some non drinker? I'll be surprised if even one person replies.
Up 27 Down 21
Wolfe on Dec 4, 2015 at 10:16 pm
Good job..
Up 33 Down 33
Gerry Nichols on Dec 4, 2015 at 7:12 pm
I fully agree that drunk driving needs to be eliminated. I was almost taken out by a drunk driver a few years ago. However, I believe there is absolutely no reason for the towing and storage charges! Is that the towing company or the RCMP that sets this outrageous fee?
Up 41 Down 5
Louis on Dec 4, 2015 at 6:51 pm
Put the checkpoint on each end of 4th Ave by TAGS at bar closure. You'll make your budgets!