Photo by Whitehorse Star
John Streicker and Brad Cathers
Photo by Whitehorse Star
John Streicker and Brad Cathers
As expected, a private member’s bill from the Yukon Party asking for amendments to the Civil Emergency Measures Act (CEMA) was defeated in the legislature Wednesday.
As expected, a private member’s bill from the Yukon Party asking for amendments to the Civil Emergency Measures Act (CEMA) was defeated in the legislature Wednesday.
Brad Cathers of the Yukon Party introduced the motion.
Cabinet minister John Streicker said he acknowledges “there are some jurisdictions in Canada — it’s about 50-50 — that require that it be the legislature that considers extensions to states of emergency, or longer states of emergency, and there are some that do not, but I think that’s a really good question to pose.
“However, we had better be pretty careful about how we introduce it so that we don’t inadvertently, through the way in which we have amended a piece of legislation here — if it’s through a private member’s bill or however it is amended — that it be done appropriately, because we are talking about incredibly serious issues,” Streicker added.
“I just want to make sure that there needs to be that forethought that would go into how this legislation would be shaped.”
Streicker continued on that tangent.
“What if we set ourselves up into a situation where we were caught without being able to take a decision?” he asked.
The NDP’s Emily Tredger said the bill “has some really important points. There is a need for more accountability and more oversight of the use of the Civil Emergency Measures Act.
“I absolutely agree that there is a need for improvement. It is well-known that we have been pushing for less politics and more opinions — and more information from experts — in the use of CEMA.”
Declaring a state of emergency that grants such broad powers to a government should be used “only in the best interests of all Yukoners,” Tredger added.
“I do want to point out that there are numerous issues with this bill as well. Parts of this bill have essentially been copied from the federal Emergencies Act. That is problematic in terms of legislative language, scope of the bill, feasibility, and so on.”
It’s a concern that this bill, as written, “would do what it is intended to do, because it is harder than one might think to take a federal bill and apply it to a much smaller jurisdiction, like ours,” Tredger said.
The Yukon Party issued a statement after losing the vote.
“A Yukon Party official Opposition bill providing more democratic oversight of the Civil Emergency Measures Act (CEMA) was blocked at second reading in the Yukon Legislative Assembly by the Liberal government with the support of their NDP coalition partners,” the statement read.
“In response to concerns raised by MLAs in debate, the Yukon Party moved an amendment to refer the bill to the all-party Standing Committee on Statutory Instruments.
“Work by the Standing Committee would have enabled Yukoners and interested groups to provide feedback on the proposed changes, as well as better enable Yukon MLAs to make any necessary amendments to ensure it is effective.”
The release went on to state, “The Liberals rejected both the amendment and overall bill, insisting that they alone should oversee a review of the legislation.
“The NDP also rejected these principles of democratic oversight. This came after the NDP agreed to support the proposal earlier in the day – only to flip-flop when it came time to make a decision.”
“This just shows the my-way-or-the-highway mentality of the Liberals,” said Cathers.
“The Liberals have touted a spirit of collaboration during their time in office, but it seems when presented with ideas and a chance for collaboration, they refuse to engage.
“It’s unfortunate, as this process would have provided an opportunity for all MLAs to have a say when it comes to invoking such important legislation such as the Civil Emergency Measures Act,” said the Lake Laberge MLA.
The Yukon Party said the proposed amendments would have:
• required that any declaration of a state of emergency be debated by the assembly within seven days and be subject to a vote;
• provided the legislature with control over the extension of a state of emergency;
• required that any regulations and ministerial orders be subject to a mandatory review by the house or a house committee within 45 days of being issued;
• empowered committees to conduct public hearings on regulations and ministerial orders under the CEMA;
• if the Speaker received a request from three MLAs, require that the assembly debate a request to revoke a declaration of a state of emergency; and
• required that a public inquiry be held after the declaration of a state of emergency (this could be waived if three-quarters of MLAs agree).
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (17)
Up 1 Down 2
Chuck Farley on Mar 16, 2022 at 9:47 am
North_of_60 " We know who they are" just who is we and who are they you need to be more forth coming.
Up 6 Down 1
Jim dandy on Mar 16, 2022 at 9:13 am
The lawsuit against YTG over the EMA, is about the lack of legislative oversight for use of the act. The curtailment of rights under the charter is only supposed to occur through legislative enactments. The lawsuit against YTG is to protect all of us from arbitrary government over reach.
Up 17 Down 4
Concerned Yukon Worker on Mar 15, 2022 at 3:58 pm
"However, we had better be pretty careful about how we introduce it so that we don’t inadvertently, through the way in which we have amended a piece of legislation here — if it’s through a private member’s bill or however it is amended — that it be done appropriately, because we are talking about incredibly serious issues,” Streicker added.
You mean you don't want it to pass without oversight or debate or questions in the Legislature... because these are incredibly serious issues? Is that what you're saying Mr. Streiker?
Are you saying you don't want a repeat of your VERY successful "pull the wool over everyone's eyes" private member's bill that resulted in the NEW Workers' Safety and Compensation Act getting passed though the Legislature on the last day of the December sitting without debate, questions, discussion - that includes incredibly serious issues for Yukon Workers like the right to be safe at work and the right to be free from reprisal for raising safety issues at work?
Have you looked at that Act to see what your Liberals have done to safety in the workplace? If you had any kids in the workforce, I'm pretty sure you would be as LIVID as I am at the changes made that puts ALL the control into WCB's hands while simultaneously removing workers' rights by removing their ability to challenge decisions made by WCB that affect their livelihoods, careers, etc.
Why tf would you pass legislation that provides no avenue for appeal for workers??? First, WCB can just dismiss the complaint if THEY think it has no merit. No avenue for appeal, no right to ask for reconsideration of that decision. FFS! Then, if the worker is lucky enough to get a hearing before the hand-picked WCB arbitrator, the legislation provides no means to ask for reconsideration or appeal of the arbitrator's decision if the worker disagrees with the hand-picked, likely biased arbitrator's decision! FFS! And if that's not enough, the new Act says the hand-picked arbitrator is not bound by the Yukon Arbitration Act!!! FFS!!!! And WTF??? What the actual **** are you doing to Yukoners?
Who is looking out for Yukon Workers? Obviously not Minister Mostyn!
Did you know Minister Mostyn is spouting off that this new legislation is GOOD for workers and safety in the workplace in the Yukon? That is ONE BIG FAT LIE. This new legislation basically puts all the control into WCB's hands. "We planned it this way because our mandate is to protect the Compensation Fund, which is funded by employer premiums, so like, um, we just blindly support our employers no matter what the issue, we just protect employers every which way we can." And just like a regular insurance company, we try to deny workers every-single-claim-or-complaint-they-make in favour of protecting the Compensation Fund (read: employers).
This government has done SO MUCH HARM TO YUKON RESIDENTS! First they call an emergency to enact full control over the population. Then they give full control to WCB to protect employers at the expense of workers. What's next? Will any of us have any rights at the end of this Liberal Dictatorship?
Up 11 Down 12
woodcutter on Mar 15, 2022 at 3:44 pm
I agree with North of 60, the worst I seen during this pandemic was the Trucker Toddler Tantrum in Ottawa brought to us courtesy of the Radical Reich Wingnuts in Canada.
Up 14 Down 5
Groucho d'North on Mar 15, 2022 at 12:30 pm
Just because a government administration is frightened by the people they are supposed to be serving, that is not an emergency, It is a result of not hearing.
Up 28 Down 11
North_of_60 on Mar 11, 2022 at 4:52 pm
A new Angus Reid Institute poll shows 80% of Canadians say pandemic has brought out the worst in their fellow citizens. This NDP\LIB coalition govt proves that beyond a doubt.
https://tnc.news/2022/03/11/80-of-canadians-say-pandemic-has-brought-out-the-worst-in-fellow-citizens/
Up 31 Down 10
North_of_60 on Mar 11, 2022 at 3:43 pm
This makes it abundantly obvious that the NDP\LIB coalition govt ruling the Yukon wants absolutely no accountability or oversight for their authoritarian and autocratic governance.
All of those who voted for the LIB or NDP in the last election are responsible for this travesty of governance. We know who they are, this whole plandemic fuster-cluck is on them.... shame on them for supporting the WEF controlled leftists. They have turned their backs on Canadian patriots, we will not forget.
Up 46 Down 16
DL on Mar 11, 2022 at 1:09 pm
These Libs have no shame. See how they completely ignored the Ottawa protesters demands to stop the vax mandates. Instead, the Trudeau regime is claiming that the protesters were trying to overthrow the government, that's their excuse now for having invoked emergency measures and brutalizing and imprisoning peaceful protesters.
And to this day, we still can't even fly within Canada without a 'vax pass', even though the plandemic is over. Talk about tyrannical abuse of 'emergency' laws, by both Yukon and federal governments.
Up 13 Down 34
stephen on Mar 11, 2022 at 10:46 am
Yukon party grandstanding. This should have gone to an all parties committee to look at first.
I agree groucho. One stick for different situation does not always work.
Up 27 Down 9
Groucho d'North on Mar 11, 2022 at 9:21 am
To be clear, there are a variety of emergencies that we may face in Canada, some are natural and others are man-made, while others are political. Why use the same tool to deal with issues that are very different? If the government wants a statute to deal with situations that may involve the citizenry and their displeasure with the government of the day, create an Act to address that rather than confounding the existing Emergencies Act? By creating an act to exclusively address control of the public, a more fulsome understanding of the government's legal abilities would be clear to all citizens and politcians alike. There is a big difference in government dealing with a flooding community and public insurection.
Up 36 Down 13
No sympathy for the devil… Please allow me to introduce myself, I’m a person of wealth and taste… on Mar 11, 2022 at 8:03 am
The Liberal Government is a lampoon of peace, order, and good governance. We the people would have related better to the abuses of power and the ongoing contradictions had Chevy Chase, John Candy, Jim Belushi been communicating this hokum. John Streicker said, “we are talking about incredibly serious issues,” however, it was clear to us that not one of them from the Chief Monkey Organizer (CMO) to the lowliest Public Official Service (POS) knew what they were doing and why they were doing it.
Up 47 Down 13
Max Mack on Mar 10, 2022 at 11:03 pm
The prolonged state of "emergency" maintained by this government - with almost zero oversight - demonstrates how badly we need to regulate the regulators.
I'm not sure the Yukon Party proposal does the trick, but it is surely a step forward in the right direction and I welcome changes to rein in the obscene powers of the CMoH, the Minister of Public Health, the Minister of HSS, and the Premier.
Too bad the Lib/NDP alliance refuses to let go of their power grab.
Up 19 Down 11
bonanzajoe on Mar 10, 2022 at 4:19 pm
BonfireJim. How's the social assistance workn out fer ya?
Up 34 Down 13
bonanzajoe on Mar 10, 2022 at 4:17 pm
The NDP’s Emily Tredger said the bill “has some really important points. There is a need for more accountability and more oversight of the use of the Civil Emergency Measures Act. But they voted against it anyway, because those NDP WFBs like their political salaries and ain't gonna shoot the golden goose. Get ready for 4 more years of Karl Marx folks.
Up 37 Down 17
DL on Mar 10, 2022 at 3:27 pm
Considering how the Libs/NDP coalition imposed unnecessary and harmful mandates on us over the past 2 years, it’s high time to amend the Emergency Measures Act for more accountability and transparency.
Too bad the Libs and NDP don’t believe in democratic process. We’ll remember that.
Up 103 Down 21
Al on Mar 10, 2022 at 2:31 pm
Of course they would shoot it down. Give up the golden key to more power? Not a bloody chance in hell.
Up 26 Down 114
BonfireJim on Mar 10, 2022 at 1:17 pm
I think the government should have outright ability to declare emergencies and quell civil liberties when there is an unprecedented emergency. Clearly most people do not know what is best for them and leaving it to the government is clearly the best way forward.