Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Health Minister Tracy-Anne McPhee

Watson Lakers want to discuss seniors’ needs: YG

Watson Lake Mayor Chris Irvin and town council say they’re “disheartened to learn that promised long-term care beds are no longer a certainty,” according to their understanding of statements made last month by Health Minister Tracy-Anne McPhee.

By Whitehorse Star on December 18, 2023

Watson Lake Mayor Chris Irvin and town council say they’re “disheartened to learn that promised long-term care beds are no longer a certainty,” according to their understanding of statements made last month by Health Minister Tracy-Anne McPhee.

Town leaders say the southeast Yukon community is in “desperate need of improved health services and long-term care options.

“Last year, our community was excited to learn that Watson Lake Hospital was to see an increase in staffing and services via long-term care beds,” Irvin and Watson Lake council said last Thursday.

“Per the minister’s November 24, 2022 press release, this service increase included ‘two long-term care beds ... with 4.5 full-time equivalent Licensed Practical Nurses to provide 24-hour support, seven days a week.’

“Many small communities in Yukon, including Watson Lake, struggle to find health professionals like nurses, doctors, and paramedics,” the town’s statement continues.

“Mayor and council, our health professionals, and other affected community members were obviously happy to hear the news that our services were seeing an increase.

“Mayor and council were equally shocked and confused to learn that this is no longer in the government’s immediate plans.”

McPhee told the legislature last month the plan announced in
 late 2022 does not suit the community’s preferences.

“To be clear, at no time since the minister’s announcement last year has our council, nor the community of Watson Lake, opposed increased health services and staff at our hospital,” the town’s statement said.

“Minister McPhee’s statements directly contradict recent communication the town has received from her department officials, and we are disappointed that the minister appears to be deflecting blame to the community for the Health department’s failure to put these resources in place.

“As since the time of the announcement last year, the Town of Watson Lake, along with our community, stand ready to support the Government of Yukon in putting these resources in place for the improvement of our community and better long-term care of our aging population,” the statement continued.

“Mayor and council stand in solidarity with our community and health professionals. We want these services and jobs at our hospital and in our community,” Irvin said.

“We issue this statement to correct the record and emphasize that there is no hold-up on our end. Let’s work together to put these services in place.”

Cabinet communications staff advised the Star Friday that the Department of Health and Social Services “has been working with the Yukon Hospital Corporation to integrate two long-term care rooms into the Watson Lake Community Hospital to increase supports in the community.

“We want to be clear – at no time have we announced a cancellation of the two long-term care beds,” the statement added.

“Earlier this year, we conducted online and in-person engagements with the community of Watson Lake, as we committed to gathering community input on the living spaces of the two long-term care rooms, including furnishings and décor, to ensure they are welcoming and culturally appropriate.”

Two in-person sessions were held last March 28 and 29 in Watson Lake, with 55 people attending. As well, there were 18 responses to the online survey, which ran for three weeks.

“We heard through this information gathering that the proposed two long-term care rooms at the Watson Lake Community Hospital are not enough; the community is aging, and the need to support people in Watson Lake is growing,” said the cabinet’s statement.

“We also heard that the community wants to discuss the current and future needs of seniors and elders in Watson Lake and the need for a long-term care facility – not two long-term care beds embedded in a hospital.

“As such, the opening of these rooms has been put on hold as we seek to best understand local needs and values. This will help inform planning for the delivery of future programming.”

A community needs assessment is underway, the statement noted.

“We will continue to work to assess opportunities to support Yukoners, including through the implementation of the Aging in Place Action Plan and Putting People First report.”

Comments (8)

Up 5 Down 14

Rick S. on Dec 20, 2023 at 10:31 pm

YT is the smartest guy on here. That being said what about traditional healing in these communities?

Up 11 Down 1

Jake on Dec 20, 2023 at 3:37 pm

@YT so 2 standards of health care then. Is that what you’re saying.Health care is not a tiered system based on where you live. It should be the priority. Maybe cut some of the extravagances around the big smoke ,or are you entitled to that too.

Up 15 Down 9

Darren P on Dec 20, 2023 at 8:47 am

@YT you must be in the Liberal Cabinet since it is clear they hate rural Yukon so much.

Up 17 Down 18

YT on Dec 19, 2023 at 1:08 pm

@jake
Where are they supposed to go? Where they went before. Dawson had a nursing station that was well staffed and had doctors. Watson had a functioning Hospital. Anything serious would be medevac’d to Whitehorse, which they still do.
The two new hospitals are much larger and much more labour and funds intensive to run and staff properly. We’re still a small jurisdiction and the outside communities can’t have the same kind of emergency services that Whitehorse has. We just don’t have the money.
Better to do one thing well than try and do a bunch of things poorly.

Up 24 Down 2

Roy on Dec 19, 2023 at 12:07 pm

@YT

I very much doubt you have the internal data on what it costs to *not* have hospitals in Watson and Dawson - both in dollars and in overall health of the communities.

The hospital in Whitehorse is currently bursting at the seams and your myopic idea would have every Yukoner that needs to be in hospital - even for less serious issues that need a few days of close 24 hour monitoring - to be sent to Whitehorse - that is both very costly to the system and to the person needing that care and to their families who have to travel to support them (therefore have to take time off work and find childcare etc etc etc) - get out of your bubble and think of the bigger picture.

Every hospital in the country is having staffing issues - that is not unique to the Yukon.

Ask the community members who have been able to have their loved ones pass away in their home communities rather than being sent to WGH how they feel about having a hospital close by.

And these hospitals you speak of are not big - especially when you consider they also contain doctors offices, pharmacies, paramedic offices etc - if they were just hospitals only they would be small buildings - you likely are not accounting for that in your uninformed “they are too expensive” comment.

Up 28 Down 8

Jake on Dec 19, 2023 at 10:56 am

@YT so if no hospital in the Klondike or Southeast what are those folks suppose to do? Go to Whitehorse? Pretty irresponsible comment. Not that I am a big YT party supporter it was the right thing to do. The services they provide are needed. And as far as the Yukon Hospital Corporation goes, what I see is pretty well managed.

Up 23 Down 35

YT on Dec 19, 2023 at 8:08 am

The Yukon Party should never have built hospitals in Dawson and Watson. The Yukon Hospital Corp has neither the money of the staff to for effective operation of both these facilities.
There’s plenty of blame to spread around for The Yukons current health care woes.

Up 29 Down 4

Nathan Living on Dec 18, 2023 at 8:04 pm

Watson Lake deserves the two long-term beds.

This should happen!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.