Photo by Photo Submitted
RIPE FOR DEVELOPMENT? – These aerial images show the federal lands along Range Road that city councillor Ted Laking believes could be better utilized for residential development.
Photo by Photo Submitted
RIPE FOR DEVELOPMENT? – These aerial images show the federal lands along Range Road that city councillor Ted Laking believes could be better utilized for residential development.
Photo by Photo Submitted
City Councillor Ted Laking
City councillor Ted Laking is growing more frustrated about the housing situation in the city – and he’s squaring off with the federal government over it.
City councillor Ted Laking is growing more frustrated about the housing situation in the city – and he’s squaring off with the federal government over it.
Laking has repeatedly brought up the subject since last summer.
His initiatives include a recent motion asking for clarification about federal properties he believes could be used for housing.
On Tuesday, he released a lengthy statement addressing the matter, and noting that federal officials haven’t responded to the city’s deadline for information.
“Whitehorse is experiencing a housing crisis that continues to worsen as the Yukon’s capital city keeps on growing,” Laking stated in the release.
“Between 2013 and 2023, the population of the Whitehorse area grew by 7,528. The rate of growth between this period was 27 per cent.
“If growth were to continue at this pace, the Whitehorse area will grow by approximately another 9,500 people by 2033.
Laking added, “These growth projections do not factor in that the federal government has announced an increase in its immigration targets to welcome 500,000 new permanent residents per year by 2025.
“To keep up with this expected massive growth, Whitehorse will be required to build (more than) 4,100 new homes by 2033 based upon Yukon’s average household size of 2.3 people.
“That works out to approximately 415 new homes per year in Whitehorse. For reference, according to the 2022 Yukon Statistical Review, there were only 236 building permits issued for new or converted residential dwellings and mobile units in Whitehorse in 2022.”
Laking noted that on Oct. 10, 2023, his motion calling on the federal government to make available federal lands for housing development was approved by city council.
The motion also requested that the federal government provide a plan and timeline for the divestment of these lands to be shared prior to the end of 2023. So far, Ottawa has not shared a plan.
“We need more action from the federal government to help address the housing crisis,” said Laking.
“A problem this big requires all orders of government to step up; it can’t just be the municipal and territorial governments contributing to the solutions.
“We know there is federal land within city limits that could be better utilized for homes. The federal government could also help by providing the amount infrastructure funding necessary to begin building the services that new residential buildings will require,” the councillor added.
It has been pointed out that one sizeable portion of federal land on Range Road could support anywhere from 88 to 594 new homes.
“With our population expected to increase, every piece of land, and every housing unit becomes that much more important, and the federal government needs to start doing more,” Laking said.
In November, Laking again raised the issue of accelerated population growth expected over the next decade and questioned if growth planning was on track.
Later, Laking requested an update on the Valleyview South (also known as the Tank Farm) planning process.
Administration confirmed that discussions with council will begin in February, and that the adoption of a master plan should happen shortly afterward.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (8)
Up 5 Down 0
Hank on Jan 10, 2024 at 11:48 am
Ya gotta wonder what goes through Ted’s head. He wants to displace those federal office and put them where? Demolishing those buildings and adding the required infrastructure will cost millions and it’s right on the clay cliffs. Yes the same cliffs that are eroding.
We don’t need a couple dozen infill lots. We need a couple THOUSAND building lots.
Beyond Copperridge (the land south of CR) has been talked about for decades. Get on it Teddy, start the process to develop that land now before whistlebend is capped out.
Up 6 Down 8
Resident on Jan 10, 2024 at 8:48 am
Takhini can't be the go-to for increasing density. Not because it's a bad spot but because the infrastructure is not there. There's a single road out with potentially two elementary schools on that road.
Whitehorse needs a serious discussion about downtown and its place as the business core of the city. The space is limited and access is restricted due to terrain and historical development.
If Laking wants to take up a cause, start advocating for the airport to be relocated in the next 50 years. That is a huge flat space, prime for development with services already in place.
Up 18 Down 5
Brian Melanson on Jan 9, 2024 at 3:15 am
Ted is going after Federal land because Pierre Pollievre said he wanted to covert 6000 unused federal buildings into housing.
He’s just taking it from the Conservative script. But Ted’s words scream Liberal
Up 50 Down 0
Municipal Problem on Jan 8, 2024 at 2:44 pm
After almost 20 years developing housing here and elsewhere, I safely conclude most of the significant barriers to more homes are municipal. Zoning, permitting, taxation and long term land planning.
Laking and City of Whitehorse need to take care of their own business first and stop trying to look concerned by pointing fingers elsewhere while doing nothing helpful.
Up 27 Down 5
SHANE on Jan 8, 2024 at 9:12 am
Tank Farm!
Up 49 Down 8
Nathan Living on Jan 4, 2024 at 3:11 pm
This is ridiculous!
Why should the federal government have to give up buildings and land inside the city when the city has promoted Whistlebend as the preferred solution for years.
One federal land disposition includes greenspace and areas used for recreation in addition to offices and shops etc which will cost 10s of millions to replace.
Ted's proposal lacks merit.
Also, the land in question is on the final aircraft approach to YXY and this area has high housing densities already.
Up 46 Down 3
Anie on Jan 4, 2024 at 3:08 pm
Wait - didn't the city argue that P, if we built that shiny new administrative building up the hill, then the city would turn over the land at the old cassiar building for affordable housing? Didn't they argue at the time, that the building had outlived its life and had to be removed.? How long ago was that?
Up 47 Down 2
YT on Jan 4, 2024 at 2:19 pm
Why is Laking going after the Feds on this? He should stay in his lane and work on freeing up City of Whitehorse land for development.