Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Tr’ondek Hwech’in Chief Roberta Joseph

Tr’ondek Hwech’in chief critical of caribou hunt

The decision to open a licensed hunt for the Fortymile caribou herd west of Dawson this winter has drawn the ire of Tr’ondek Hwech’in Chief Roberta Joseph.

By CP on January 2, 2020

DAWSON CITY – The decision to open a licensed hunt for the Fortymile caribou herd west of Dawson this winter has drawn the ire of Tr’ondek Hwech’in Chief Roberta Joseph.

Territorial officials have been working with Tr’ondek Hwech’in First Nation and the State of Alaska to help restore the migratory herd’s numbers since 1995, said Rob Florkiewicz, a fish and wildlife harvest co-ordinator with the territorial government.

The territory acted unilaterally and prematurely, Joseph said, since the First Nation has yet to sign off on a harvest management plan for the herd that’s still being negotiated.

A plan would include details such as timing, geographic areas and the allowable harvest for a particular hunting season, Joseph said.

At the turn of the century, the herd’s population may have numbered more than half a million caribou, said Florkiewicz.

Historically, the caribou migrated as far south as Whitehorse, more than 500 kilometres southeast of Dawson City. But by the 1970s, increased hunting and predation by wolves had spurred their precipitous decline.

Members of the Tr’ondek Hwech’in First Nation have subsistence hunting rights and do not require a permit. However, they have also volunteered not to harvest from the herd for more than two decades, said Joseph.

“It was a huge sacrifice for our people,” she said. At one time, she noted, caribou from the Fortymile herd were an important food source for members.

She acknowledged that the herd’s population has increased, but said the First Nation’s people are still in “conservation mode.”

“After not being able to harvest for over 20 years, it’s going to take some time to reconnect with the Fortymile caribou, its habitat (and) our old traditional hunting areas,” the chief said.

On the Alaskan side, harvesting Fortymile caribou was not banned, but the state government imposed harvesting limits and carried out a wolf-culling program that ended two years ago.

In the state’s management plan for the herd, the Yukon and Alaskan governments agreed to allocate 65 per cent of the total harvest to Alaskans, while Yukon hunters could take the rest, said Florkiewicz.

In Yukon, that works out to around 1,200 animals, he said, but the territory has elected not to access its share – until now.

All hunters, whether they are successful or not, must report their results.

According to the 1998 treaty between the Tr’ondek Hwech’in Nation and the Yukon and Canadian governments, the territory must allocate a portion of the total allowable harvest for Fortymile caribou to the nation.

“It’s pretty clear that (the) Yukon government is not honouring the agreement,” said Joseph.

There should be no licensed hunt for Fortymile caribou in Yukon without a collaboratively-developed and approved harvest management plan, she said.

Matthew Cameron, a government spokesman, said in an email this year’s harvesting opportunities are designed to ensure Tr’ondek Hwech’in’ rights are honoured, and sign-off is not required.

The hunt is aligned with adaptive management provisions approved for the herd in 2015 as part of the Yukon’s Wildlife Act, which are separate from the harvest management plan, he said.

Joseph said pressure from the Alaskan government spurred the territory to open the hunt this year.

The state government indicated it would seek to increase its own allocation of the harvest for the Fortymile herd if the Yukon government did not allow harvesting, she said.

The federal Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife has not assessed the Fortymile herd.

A neighbouring caribou herd is doing well.

But that herd is one of just two barren-ground populations increasing across the Arctic, from Alaska to Baffin Island, the committee said in its 2016 assessment of the species.

By Brenna Owen
The Canadian Press

Comments (19)

Up 18 Down 6

Dave on Jan 8, 2020 at 8:06 am

Ever notice how the most racist comments are usually from FN commenters anytime someone disagrees with their outlook on anything? Anyways, Alan this member of the alien race says 'your welcome' for bringing toilet paper to the new world so you don't have to use leaves or snow anymore. Next time you're on a indoor throne thank an alien!

Up 18 Down 4

Billy Peterson on Jan 8, 2020 at 7:03 am

The rules have to be the same for all user groups or there will always be trouble. If your going to be traditional you should be traditional right down the line otherwise you are a hypocrite.

Up 7 Down 2

A. Shaymed-Ovyoo on Jan 7, 2020 at 10:16 pm

Alan - I agree with you that any perspective that vilifies another is problematic. It is also highly problematic to engage in cultural determinism. This sort of presumptive reasoning is divisive and destructive. It is a rather glaring distortion that people who do not have the base level of intelligence to set aside advance as some sense of entitlement. This stupid idea of cultural determinism that has been used against people for this government policy or that government whether Indigenous or white is patently corrupt.

There is no such thing as white culture and there is no such thing as Indigenous culture. People within these groups vary to the degree that they accept or reject “cultural” norms or practices. There is greater difference within groups than between them.

Every individual acts in a localized context in which their behaviour is bounded by the fluid hierarchy inherent to stratified societies. And don’t kid yourself - Indigenous societies are stratified societies as well.

The more general the category the less precise we are able to be. It is a huge mistake and one of the greatest blunders ever to have been accepted as a governmental strategy, the notion of the categorical other. Give your head a shake!

It is because we have lost the ability to see the other that we continue to struggle in our relationships with one another. There are too many people trying to make others something they are not.

So, quit trying to divide people into us and them groupings. Children do this. It is behaviour we use to discourage but now it seems it has made a comeback with whole identity politics shenanigans written into policy and law.
I get it Alan - We take our morality from the environment around us because we must cope with it and exist in it. Be better.

Up 3 Down 5

First Nation Harvester on Jan 7, 2020 at 3:23 pm

In response to Blonde Indian and A. Connun-Drumm. Please do A.Connun-Drumm bringing more attention to the, done openly and unashamedly (blatant ), avoidance to adhere to, mismanaged, misinterpreted agreement. That is the UFA we welcome it.
Blonde Indian I was more referring to ch 10, 11 and 24. As for the this form's fellowship we all would be well served to exercise 28.3.5.1
It is my belief that first nation of Yukon will continue to be courageous and strive for success even with the old belabored ways of the past still being regurgitated time and time again from the same old angry voices we have heard for so, so, so many years. Let's just make the realization right here, right today that times are a-changing and the First Nations of Yukon are standing up and we are educating ourselves no matter what ridiculous rhetoric is spewed in our direction.
Keep poking the Bear, I encourage it.

Up 6 Down 2

Anie on Jan 7, 2020 at 3:02 pm

Alan, could we maybe just this once have a civil discussion about an issue on interest to all Yukoners without hauling out the tired old tune about the past? Enough already, if "reconciliation" means anything more than one long guilt trip for things that took place long before any of us walked this earth then please let's reconcile and move forward.

Up 26 Down 3

Blonde Indian on Jan 7, 2020 at 8:01 am

@First Nations Harvesters
You must have skipped the part in Chapter 16, if I had a copy of a UFA I would be specific.
But I know it does say that “In cooperation to have an ABUNDANCE OF UNGULATES” for all, subsistence hunters, sportsman, Trappers, recreational.
When people actually read a UFA you realize it was for Cooperative Management, not how YG has been only factoring and benefiting the First Nations.
So that means in areas where there is a Permit hunt for caribou, sheep, moose, for licensed hunters. Then the First Nations should also be implying regulations with regards to reducing harvest in that area on their citizens.
It’s not a Us vs Them issue.
It’s a lack of respect for all users that is upsetting licensed Hunters. Many of which have First Nations partners and children.
Re-Read your UFA, it’s a Co-Operative Management contract.

Up 6 Down 31

Alan on Jan 6, 2020 at 9:23 pm

Chief Jacob Thomas, Cayuga Chief, Yukon 1988: "You people have been here for 500 years, we know everything about your culture you know nothing about ours." Any time we have First nations issues in the news for comment it draws overtly racist and anti First nations comments. If you want further clarification as to aliens, how about the genocidal policies carried by church and state, that is about as alien as it gets. Christian missionaries declaring First Nations culture and beliefs as the products of the devil is about as alienated from reality as you can get. Alienation and the atomized mass man alienated from his instinctual foundations begins with the industrial revolution not with hunter gatherer Red Indians of North America, and in my opinion the environmental ethic of First Nations Traditional people is the hallmark of a superior culture.

Up 17 Down 2

A. Connun-Drumm on Jan 6, 2020 at 6:25 pm

Dear First Nation Harvester - We should poke the bear as you suggest. You have highlighted the idea that the Umbrella Agreement may not be a valid document as a result of your assertion of the Royal Proclamation, 1763.

No unjust law should stand and just laws should take its place.

Up 20 Down 9

B. Tha-Change on Jan 6, 2020 at 1:01 pm

Alan - Can you please clarify your statement? It seems to suggest that FN and some other “alien race” of “wasteful transplants” arrived here at the same time 14,000 years ago. Who are these “alien” races? I’m curious because race is a constructed social fact rather than an actual fact.

If your suggestion is true then it appears that the discovery of the new lands - Now North America - was a joint venture? This is perhaps supported by the percentage of European blood/DNA found in First Nation samples.

You seem to be on to something here and it would be helpful to the rest of us if you expand on it further.
Anger only works if you want to become a Sith Lord for the dark side - Hmmm... Angry you sound... Rational you must be!

Mahsi

Up 14 Down 32

First Nation Harvester on Jan 5, 2020 at 10:08 pm

Royal Proclamation of 1763 October 7th-And whereas it is just and reasonable, and essential to Our Interest and the Security of Our Colonies, that the several Nations or Tribes of Indians, with whom We are connected, and who live under Our Protection, should not be molested or disturbed in the Possession of such Parts of Our Dominions and Territories as, not having been ceded to, or purchased by Us, are reserved to them, or any of them, as their Hunting Grounds. . . . Enough said......who wants to poke the bear and test the UFA

Up 21 Down 67

Alan on Jan 4, 2020 at 8:55 pm

Chief Roberta Joseph stand your proud ground of a minimum 14000 years of survival, against the wasteful transplants of an alien race constantly going back on their word.

Up 50 Down 13

Groucho d'North on Jan 4, 2020 at 1:56 pm

I don't understand the resistance by the First Nation leadership to make public their harvest data each year. As a significant part of our community/society/hunting interest, and one that likes to be regarded as "Stewards of the Land" there is little evidence to suggest all is well and respectful harvesting is being done by both licenced hunters and those harvesting under the terms of the Indian Act (1876).
Until such times as indiginous harvest data is shared publically, there will always be the suspicion that over harvesting is being done because many of us have witnessed the carnage on the Dempster when multiple caribou have been shot and left as hunters move on to kill more. I have also witnessed similar over harvesting in areas like Aligator Lake where I counted two bulls, a cow and two calves hanging on poles in the camp of only three hunters.
People hunt within the terms of their allowable harvest. Licenced hunters take only one, because that is the term of the regulations. Aboriginal hunters are limited by how many animals are locally available, and the Indian Act does not include any harvest limits because things were much different back in 1876.

Up 97 Down 17

Davis on Jan 3, 2020 at 9:23 am


Chef Joseph says that even though the Tr’ondek Hwech’in First Nation have subsistence hunting rights and do not require a permit they have volunteered not to harvest from the herd for more than two decades - I do not believe this for one second. It's possible that some members actually restricted their harvest but I personally know Tr’ondek Hwech’in members that hunt that heard almost yearly. How would they even know if their members have stopped harvesting or not when they don't have any type of management plan in place and members don't require any sort of permit to harvest?? I find it very hypocritical of the Tr’ondek Hwech’in to criticize YG for opening up this hunt, citing conservation concerns for the heard, when they themselves refuse to participate in any sort of conservation/harvest management plan.

Up 25 Down 75

Miles Epanhauser on Jan 2, 2020 at 10:30 pm

Wow, seems like GY could have worked this out beforehand thus avoiding a gov to gov conflict.
Seems like a serious communication deficit.

Up 93 Down 15

Liam on Jan 2, 2020 at 6:58 pm

How about Tr’ondek Hwech’in get with modern times, report your harvest like everyone else, don’t hunt in the spring, don’t use your sustinence rights to allow your friends to hunt and most of all recognize this land we share and we all share the responsibility to benefit from it and manage it .

Up 80 Down 20

Thomas Brewer on Jan 2, 2020 at 4:56 pm

"the First Nation’s people are still in “conservation mode.”"
That's the biggest load of crap I've heard all year... but the year is young...

Up 52 Down 7

SheepChaser on Jan 2, 2020 at 4:51 pm

Additionally, the reporting requirements are mandatory for successful and unsuccessful hunters. The information they submit will be critical in determining future management.

Up 84 Down 17

BnR on Jan 2, 2020 at 4:35 pm

When the First Nations start reporting accurate harvest data for their members, they can join in the management plan process, otherwise.....

Up 80 Down 20

SheepChaser on Jan 2, 2020 at 3:00 pm

This year's Yukon permit hunt is limited to 225 bulls out of a total herd population of approximately 84,000 individuals. Far less than local management boards, Alaska wildlife managers and others familiar with the herd are recommending in order to keep the herd healthy.

The hunt is well within standing agreements and law. This is a great example of a First Nation being totally unreasonable in their approach to self governance, intergovernmental relations and demonstrates huge a lack of respect for agreements they have already signed.
.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.