
Photo by Chuck Tobin
Rob Yeomans and Lewis Rifkind
Photo by Chuck Tobin
Rob Yeomans and Lewis Rifkind
An application to renew a mineral exploration permit inside the Tombstone Territorial Park has exploded overnight into the largest file ever handled by a key regulatory board.
An application to renew a mineral exploration permit inside the Tombstone Territorial Park has exploded overnight into the largest file ever handled by a key regulatory board.
In the last 24 hours, Dawson City's designated office of the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB) has received more than 500 comments on-line – and counting.
Most – almost all according to a random sample – are opposed.
Many are remarkably similar in nature, citing the need to protect critical wildlife habitat and maintain the attractiveness of the park as a tourist destination.
Canadian United Minerals has applied to the YESAB for a renewal of its five-year exploration permit. The previous five-year permit, its second five-year permit, expired in May.
Controversy over the 18 quartz claims goes back a decade when the company was accused of a staking "nuisance claims” just ahead of the staking moratorium which was imposed while planning for the park moved into high gear.
Canadian United, however, has countered that the claims have legitimate potential to yield an operating gold mine.
Canadian United owner Joel White could not be reached for comment today.
Lewis Rifkind, the mining co-ordinator for the Yukon Conservation Society, agreed this morning that some of the comments received over the last day from across North America are similar.
He suspects they orginate out of a call to action by the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society.
While most are from outside the Yukon, one has to remember the YESAB has invited public comment without borders, and the Tombstone Territorial Park is known to many around the world, he said.
Rifkind said the Yukon government, after all, has made it the hallmark of its campaign to promote tourism.
Rob Yeomans, the YESAB's spokesman, said he too recognized a similarity among many of the submissions.
But he said staff will give each one its full and fair consideration.
The Dawson office, he said, is committed to delivering its recommendation to the Yukon government in the first week of August.
The deadline to comment on the application is tomorrow.
Last week, Rifkind renewed the call upon the government to do something to have Canadian United agree to surrender the mineral claims.
If the debate is red-hot now, during exploration work, one can imagine what it would be like if the company applied to establish a working mine with a year-round, all-weather road connection to the Dempster Highway, he suggested.
Rifkind maintains the YESAB is not where the debate will end.
The environmental screening agency weighs applications on the nuts and bolts of the proposal, he reiterated this morning.
He said the government, on the other hand, is in the political position to invite discussion with the company to see if they can reach a mutual agreement to give up the claims.
Premier Dennis Fentie was in meetings this morning and unavailable to discuss the notion.
Before losing office in late 2002, then-Liberal premier Pat Duncan refused to entertain any sort of negotiations with Canadian United.
The company also stated publicly it was interested in working the claims, not talking about how to surrender them.
There was also a legal attempt by the Tr'ondek Hwech'in Han Nation of Dawson City to have the claims quashed by a section of its land claims that commits to protection of the Tombstone park for all time. In the end, the courts upheld the company's right to access and work the claims.
The Tr'ondek have restated their objections to the exploration permit last month in a joint submission to the YESAB. It is signed by Chief Simon Mervyn of Mayo's First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun and Chief Richard Nerysoo of Fort McPherson's Gwich'in Tribal Council.
Of the 15 submissions chosen randomly by this Star this morning from the hundreds received in the last 24 hours, one is from a Whitehorse resident who hikes in the park; five are from B.C., three of whom have hiked in the park; four are from Alberta and opposed in principle; and two are from the United States, and opposed in principle.
There were no letters of support for the application.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (10)
Up 0 Down 0
Kailey Irwin on Jul 30, 2010 at 3:41 pm
I think the disgusting this is that this is in a protected park. There are many other places to mine, yet they have to go and spoil one of our beautiful parks. Well 100 years down the road (if humans can last that much longer) people will be wishing that more areas were left untouched, but by then the entire Yukon will probably just be one large mine. Gross.
Up 0 Down 0
patrick bourke on Jul 29, 2010 at 4:00 am
I flew from ottawa to whitehorse, rented a camper truck drove to spend a week in Tombstone. I did this because it is a crown jewel of Canada. As a past inhabitant I can tell you mines are everywhere over the world. You can get the gold out of the desolation in Dawson. There is still lots there.
Don't destroy Tombstone for th erest of the world. When I flew up a planeload of German tourists were flying in every week to see yukon wilderness. NO ONE is flying in to see the tarsands except Dick Cheney
Up 0 Down 0
Angela Sabo on Jul 29, 2010 at 3:53 am
I am not surprised that 500 comments were send in opposition to Canadian United proposal. Also I am not suprised about the similarity of the comments. People who are considering the future of the land are like-minded and have the same ideas. If the proposal goes through the company will naturally apply for a road permit next. The First Nations concerned restated their objection. Does their voice mean anything or was the devolution agreement of 2003 nothing but a farce? And is the YESAB organization in Dawson able to state an unbiased opinion?
Up 0 Down 0
Tammy Routley on Jul 29, 2010 at 3:50 am
This is so ridiculous! Do these mining individuals think we, the public, are so stupid that we do not know what any mining, let alone gold mining- does to the environment? I live in Alberta, the land of oil and all the pollution and disease and tainted water that goes with oil. Gold mining is no different, possibly worse, as immense amounts of land are 'processed' for tiny amounts of gold! There has to be an end to this insanity! We should not have to fight for our Earth to remain clean to provide a few persons with a short term profit! Will there be no clean areas left for our children? I fear for the human race...
Up 0 Down 0
Holier than thou Wannabe on Jul 28, 2010 at 10:23 pm
I want to be a greenie too. I gave it some thought and, once I eliminate all the mining products in my life, I will have to relocate to a cave and eat bugs that I kill with my fingernails. Hmmm, guess it might be an idea to support mining operations that engage in sustainable development. I'm kind of attached to my shovel, pen, car, computer, phone, tent, roads, etc. etc.
Guess I'll never be pure enough to use all the products mining provides and then smugly judge and condemn the miners who make it all possible for me and my children to have a good quality of life.
Up 0 Down 0
Comtessa de Metoncula on Jul 28, 2010 at 1:28 am
My Gosh, us humans are inherently stupid and ignorant.
Before we know it, our beautiful Blue Planet will look as desolate as the Moon because of our folly and cupidity!
Up 0 Down 0
Charles Stephen on Jul 26, 2010 at 11:17 pm
Mining destroys the land: rips it up, releases toxic compounds into streams, killing plants and animals and poisoning communities - including human ones- downstream. Plus the road building would destroy everything in its path to get to the exploratory sites, nevermind the actual mining sites when/if the exploration finds what it's looking for. This is stupid, short-sighted, and almost none of the money will stay in the community for any amount of time. What is the point? Short-term gain for a few rich folks, long-term health impacts on working folks and long-term detrimental ecological impacts on all the life in the area. Also, THIS IS IN A PROTECTED PARK.
Up 0 Down 0
Don McKenzie on Jul 26, 2010 at 12:09 pm
Panning for gold in a hardrock mine, David Pittman? Wow. You're swift.
Up 0 Down 0
David Pittman on Jul 26, 2010 at 3:18 am
Why not try the old ways of looking for gold, paning instead of destroying land in the process. Were not the only inhabitants there, theirs lots of criters out there to.
Up 0 Down 0
JC on Jul 21, 2010 at 9:57 am
Its summer, the southern hippies are back. There's gold in them thar hills. Lets git it - screw the hippies and their nature gods. The gold is more important then the two dozen tourists that visit that area every summer. Besides, if we don't take precious metals out of the ground what will the hippies do? They might have to go to work to support their pot habits. Oh mygosh!