Stop work order placed on inn's demolition
The demolition of the Pioneer Inn has been halted by the city.
By Stephanie Waddell on December 5, 2008
The demolition of the Pioneer Inn has been halted by the city.
The stop work order was issued Tuesday to Kingcat Contracting, the company responsible for the demolition. Most of the work done so far was conducted last week.
In an interview Thursday afternoon, city planning manager Mike Gau said the order was made to Kingcat for not following a condition of the permit that waste from the site be hauled to the city landfill.
"It went outside of city limits," Gau said. He confirmed the debris from the site went to the Burma Road area north of Whitehorse.
Once it leaves city limits, it's in the Yukon government's jurisdiction.
For that reason, Gau explained, there's a condition in the permit that if the contractor hauls demolition waste outside of Whitehorse, proof of approval from the territory must be provided to the city.
It's unknown how long the order will be in place, but Gau said the city and contractor are working toward resolving it.
The order was issued specifically around the condition of where the waste is hauled.
However, the permit also stipulates the contractor must have an overall plan for demolition.
That plan must include the amount of material that will be taken from the site, the times and route for hauling waste, the start and completion date of the work, contact information for the supervisor and a remediation plan detailing how the site will be left.
Other conditions outlined in the permit include having approvals from Occupational Health and Safety officials, the city's Department of Engineering and Public Works and further permits from the city.
Among the general conditions of the document, Kingcat must also:
-
provide security to prevent vandalism or forced entry, with security personnel providing contact numbers to the city in case of emergency;
-
acknowledge responsibility to get approval from other jurisdictions where required; and
-
keep all streets and public property clean and free of any obstacles form the site.
While Gau said the city has some concerns around the security of the site, he stressed the stop-work order revolves specifically around the condition of where the material is taken.
The document was signed by Kingcat on Nov. 21, with city officials approving it a week earlier.
Kingcat owner Robby King, whose name appears on the city permit, declined to comment on the situation this morning.
The Yukon Workers Compensation Health and Safety Board has also been involved in the demolition, looking for the possibility of asbestos in one part of the building.
Tests have since confirmed there's no asbestos in the structure.
Rather than issuing a stop work order while waiting for test results to come back, the board instructed crews to stay out of that part of the building and work on other areas of the demolition, board president Valerie Royle said this morning.
The board received the results yesterday, confirming there's no asbestos in that section, she said.
Meanwhile, Dennis Senger, a spokesman for the Yukon's Department of Environment, confirmed earlier this week officials are looking into "several" phone calls about the dumping and burning of waste in a trench on a Burma Road property.
"The matter is under investigation," he said.
The department won't comment on details of its investigation.
Comments (8)
Up 0 Down 0
pete on Dec 11, 2008 at 5:46 pm
Alk some people like to go home at night without crack-heads and bums bothering you.......Bet you live in the country with a nice view
Up 0 Down 0
Al K on Dec 11, 2008 at 7:09 am
AUGT: Do you own this company? Or are you just a co-owner?
Up 0 Down 0
pete on Dec 11, 2008 at 6:08 am
Who cares ! Get rid of that eyesore and a few others downtown
Up 0 Down 0
Anthony on Dec 9, 2008 at 10:12 am
Ummm... AUGT, I don't know if you realize this but the contractor was illegally hauling waste out to the Lake Laberge transfer station.
That means that the Yukon taxpayer was on the hook for trucking that waste all the way back to Whitehorse, then paying tipping fees to dump it in the landfill.
Basically, the contractor was offloading the cost of disposal to the taxpayer, instead of taking it to the landfill and paying the costs as he was required to do.
The contractor should be receiving a bill for the clean-up, not the other way around.
Up 0 Down 0
Thomas Brewer on Dec 9, 2008 at 9:46 am
AUGT - are you out of your mind?
The demo crew agreed to the conditions of the demo permit, which stipulated that all waste was to be taken to the Landfill.
By trucking it out of city limits and burning it, they're circumventing the permit in an effort to avoid paying tipping fees.
Zero compensation is due the contractor, in fact they should be worried about legal action from the city or territory.
RTFA next time before you start typing.
Up 0 Down 0
Arn Anderson on Dec 9, 2008 at 9:31 am
I hope the city is NOT compensating them for the cost of delay. Contractor cant even follow stimpulations layed out in the contract. Cant follow orders, well then find a new person to deal with it.
Up 0 Down 0
LP on Dec 8, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Are you kidding, this company should be fined for dumping this industrial litter in an area that does not have the capacity for it.
Ironic that the same company runs an environmental cleanup service.
Up 0 Down 0
AUGT on Dec 7, 2008 at 9:48 am
I hope the city is compensating them for the cost of delay, including interest on loans during the stop work period as well as any incidental costs associated with the stop work order.