Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

EYE ON THE ROOF – A new $60,000 digital camera system has been installed in this bylaw vehicle as a measure to increase surveillance of parking zones to detect time violations. The bylaw department will be concentrating its efforts in the two-hour zones, says the manager of bylaw (top). Star photo by CHUCK TOBIN MORE MONITORING – Two-hour parking zones such as this will be the subject of increased monitoring by a new digital camera that records licence plates and the time (bottom right). Star photo by VINCE FEDOROFF Dave Pruden

Parking enforcement not a cash grab, city insists

The city's new digital parking enforcer is in operation, but it won't be used to issue tickets until June 9.

By Chuck Tobin on May 23, 2014

The city's new digital parking enforcer is in operation, but it won't be used to issue tickets until June 9.

In the meantime, the rooftop camera mounted on the bylaw department's Ford Escape is being used to educate drivers who are currently staying longer than allowed in the two-hour parking zones in downtown Whitehorse.

When the camera detects a violation, the officer places a brochure on the windshield.

Bylaw manager Dave Pruden says nothing really is going to change, though monitoring time violations will be more efficient and bylaw officers will be able to cover more ground if required.

Officers these days still need to get out of their vehicle to chalk tires as a method of checking for compliance, which can be a safety issue, he said in an interview Thursday.

Pruden said on average, the city currently issues between 180 and 210 tickets a month for staying longer than the two-hour time limit.

Typically, he added, an officer will chalk between four and eight two-hour zones in a morning, and perhaps just as many in the afternoon, depending on the work load.

The tire chalking program will continue as the sole means of issuing tickets until the electronic camera takes over June 9, Pruden said.

The new $60,000 surveillance equipment was recommended in the Downtown Parking Management Plan adopted by city council in 2011.

As the bylaw car drives by, the camera records the licence plate of the parked vehicle and the time, Pruden explained.

He said if the vehicle is still parked there more than two hours later, the lap top will sing out as the bylaw car passes by again, and the officer will stop and write the ticket.

As outlined in the brochure being circulated by the bylaw department, the two-hour zone requires drivers to leave the zone after two hours, for a minimum of two hours.

The clock, however, does not stop and start with each movement of a vehicle.

Drivers who park at 9 a.m. in a two-hour zone have until 11 a.m. before they must move their vehicle. If they leave and come back at 10 a.m., the clock does not restart.

Rather, once a vehicle is recorded in two-hour zone, the two hours begin, and regardless of how many times the vehicle leaves and returns, it must leave the zone at the end of the initial two hours for at least two hours.

So if a vehicle parks at 9 a.m., it must vacate the zone at 11 a.m. and cannot return before 1 p.m., says the brochure.

Pruden says in some communities down south, once a vehicle has parked in a two-hour zone, it's not allowed to return at all that day.

A parking zone is defined as one side of the street on a city block, the other side of the street being another zone.

Pruden said drivers simply moving their vehicle from one side of the street to the other could cause safety issues, not to mention it's illegal to drive across a solid yellow line.

The media and others, he said, will try to make out this increased enforcement as an effort to raise more money for city coffers.

Pruden insists raising revenue is not the reason for implementing the new procedures.

The intent is to ensure a steady rotation of parking opportunities so that residents are able to park and do their business, Pruden said.

He said tougher enforcement is driven by complaints, such as those from the business community worried about losing customers who can't find a place to park.

The new parking plan adopted by city council three years ago recommended stricter restrictions throughout the downtown core by 2020.

The plan calls for eventually removing free all-day parking from Black Street to Lowe Street, and from Front Street to Sixth Avenue, along with promoting more transit use and encouraging the development of more private parking lots.

Pruden said the stricter parking rules included in the new management plan are only recommendations.

There is, for instance, nothing on the books right now to expand restrictions beyond those which already exist, though that's not to say the city won't receive and respond to further complaints, he said.

Pruden said in the last year, for instance, the city added four or five two-hour zones because of concerns raised.

Any requests to address parking concerns with increased restrictions are reviewed by the city's traffic committee before any action is taken, he pointed out.

Pruden also acknowledged if officers detect an issue in other parking zones, such as drivers plugging meters in the one-hour zones along Main Street, the digital surveillance equipment could be brought into play.

Right now, he said, the focus is on the two-hour zone.

The brochure being circulated by the bylaw department notes free parking is available at the city parking lot at the top of Main Street, behind the United Church.

There's also free parking in the city lot at Black Street and Front Street.

Free parking is still available on some city streets, though the brochure recommends drivers get there early because they fill up quickly.

The brochure points out downtown residents living in a two-hour zone can pay $25 a year for a permit to park for free in front of their homes, and $350 a year for a second vehicle.

In 2013, according to bylaw records, the city collected $544,349 in coin revenue from parking meters. How much it collected through fines related to meter violations was unavailable this morning.

For all other parking fines, including revenue from tickets issued for staying too long in a two-hour zone, the city collected $56,799 last year, according to records.

Comments (25)

Up 5 Down 9

John Doe on Jun 2, 2014 at 3:25 am

Cash grab for sure ! And I would be 1 pissed off citizen if I went to my car and found my tires marked up! It may only be chalk but that is still destruction of property or something of the nature, which comes at the hands of a bylaw official. I wouldn't be pissed because it's only chalk but because of the hypocrisy behind it.

Up 6 Down 14

anie on Jun 2, 2014 at 2:25 am

Dazed and Confused: the whole point of parking meters and parking enforcement is to keep traffic moving downtown so that people will have a place to park when they come downtown to shop. The alternative is people who work downtown parking all day, and leaving no parking for others.

If the feds had provided parking, and if other businesses such as Coast Mountain Sports, who rent out office space to government, were required to provide parking, then we wouldn't have such a problem.

So what if it's a "cash grab"? This is my city, the cash goes to my city, so frankly I don't know why so many people have their knickers in a knot over this.

Up 18 Down 1

Dazed and Confused on May 31, 2014 at 10:45 pm

Huh, it says it was too dangerous to get out of their car to chalk the tires. Then it says, when the laptop sings (which I am sure they have to look at - which is dangerous as well) they get out of their vehicle after writing a ticket. I guess this means they now block a lane of traffic to write a ticket if there is nowhere for them to park. Sorry but this has cash grab written all over it. I am a seasonal worker here and I have always found it amazing that the city has so many "by-law" officers walking around just doing parking enforcement. I get to watch them all come in and out of city hall all day long. Certainly doesn't encourage locals to shop downtown at all.

Up 24 Down 2

Walmart forever on May 30, 2014 at 9:43 am

... Good purchase City ... More and more people will shop at Walmart, you'll lose "revenue" and downtown businesses will suffer. Nice move, good way to revitalize downtown ... What genius in City Planning who has free parking dreamed this up?

Up 24 Down 1

Jane Jack on May 30, 2014 at 1:37 am

The City wants to encourage less parking downtown and keep spaces open? The City also has this sustainability plan to decrease the amount of vehicles that people are driving. I'd say lets see that Mr. Pruden guy give up his city vehicle and start walking, biking or taking the bus everywhere. Change all starts from the top, otherwise it's "Do as I say, not as I do."

Up 24 Down 3

TT on May 29, 2014 at 2:18 pm

No problem, I'll just avoid downtown. Walmart is looking better and better.

Up 23 Down 1

Adele Sandrock on May 29, 2014 at 5:24 am

Park in backwards and the money vultures have to move their well-paid behind at least out of the car to check.

Up 8 Down 3

Josey Wales on May 28, 2014 at 9:51 pm

Yeah...what Max said! Our nobles are kinda like the berg that the Titanic struck, what costs seen are but a wee part...the "other" amount as Max eludes too?

Are IMHO very real, and is lurking beneath and far bigger that what we see.

CoW nobles spend probably at least 60k annually for mere snacks and swank beverages whilst they sit and "think" for us.

Wait for it folks...fines for merely trying to WORK in the downtown core (more than regular), clearly from what I DO SEE...loitering around gassed and high is what is really encouraged in this new sty.

We have cameras too, perhaps someone should start a You-Tube channel shaming our civic blowholes and their minions with what Whitehorse in 2014 HAS become?

Very very much acting as the "kings men" to fleece the peasants of every bit-O-gold possible!

Wilderness city my ass, seems more like we are run by Orcs.

Anyone seen Gandolf? We need the magic of a wizard up here to "reset"...the script.

Up 26 Down 1

what do business owners think of this? on May 27, 2014 at 10:05 pm

Would like to hear the thoughts of Main St/downtown business owners, because there are several options for shopping with 'free' parking. I agree with some of the comments here, as I feel that there are simply too many cars downtown at any given time for the population. But there have to be viable options and - sorry - cycling to work simply isn't one, except possibly from Riverdale, for most people. I'd like to see the cost of operating meters (the meters themselves, the staff) vs revenue from them.

Up 16 Down 2

CJ on May 27, 2014 at 10:39 am

In all seriousness, I think it's time to wonder if all the so-called sustainability initiatives to decrease vehicle use are in reality working as some kind of co-dependent dynamic to increase it. I don't know why that would be, but there's no point closing your eyes to it.

A few months ago, some planner who was giving a talk was interviewed on CBC, talking about how great Vancouver was, how green and so on. And Sandy said something about traffic there was approaching the volume of Los Angeles and asked about it. Instead of answering, he slid off on some other talking point that he preferred. But I would really like to know how could that be?

Up 26 Down 2

Francis Pillman on May 27, 2014 at 6:42 am

I don't know about everyday, but I have rode the same bus as Dan Curtis. I never saw Bev "haircuts' Buckway ever on transit though.

Up 30 Down 2

jack on May 26, 2014 at 1:59 pm

If the city budget is built with assumptions of cash flows originating from parking fines, then it is a cash grab.

Up 28 Down 2

anonymous on May 26, 2014 at 10:05 am

I know for a fact it is revenue. Don't trust what the government is telling you.

Up 28 Down 2

Thomas Brewer on May 26, 2014 at 6:53 am

Do you think they would implement a new system that didn't increase revenue?

Let's have some transparency over the next few months on how many tickets get issued, ok CoW?

Up 28 Down 2

Max Mack on May 26, 2014 at 5:49 am

I suspect the true cost of this "high tech" system is so much more than the $60,000 quoted in the article. Cost of software and systems upgrades, interfaces with the city's existing software, maintenance, the ongoing cost of resolving glitches probably amounts to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

This system will also probably not work very well with dirty or snow-covered plates -- which makes me question the cost-effectiveness of this "solution".

Has CoW actually amended its bylaws to make it illegal to park in multiple spots in the same "zone" during the same day? Or, are they just pretending that the bylaws give them that power?

Up 9 Down 25

Bold New Move on May 26, 2014 at 5:16 am

We need some bold new moves to change driving habits travelling into the Whitehorse downtown area. Downtown being from bottom of two mile to the paddle wheeler. Change requires leadership and acceptance of change by everyone involved. This potential change is to drivers work and park down town. Possible change:

1. The mayor and council ride the transit to work at City Hall?

2. The City of Whitehorse develop a policy that all employees working for the City in the downtown area must ride the bus as requirements of their employment.

3. Issue a challenge to the Yukon Government to adopt the same policy.

4. Issue a challenge to the all down town businesses to adopt the same policy for their employees.

5. Maybe determine some type of financial incentive to bring the program forward.

6. Make it a campaign called LETS ALL GET ON BOARD.

7. We all know the old saying lead by example!

8. Whitehorse like all Cities is a unique City in Canada and I see we were number 7 out of 15 of the best small Cities to live in Canada.

9. Governments like the City of Whitehorse and the Yukon Government should be leaders in positive change.

10. How many government employees working in downtown that drive including City and YTG?

11. What are the total parking spacing in the downtown area?

12. What is the parking capacity in the downtown area?

13. How efficient is the downtown parking?

14. Has anyone asked drivers into downtown to work what will encourage them to change to using the transit service?

15. How many vehicles park in the downtown every day?

Some ideas that might spark debate or discussions. Just an idea.

Up 45 Down 10

Groucho d'North on May 25, 2014 at 2:29 am

What a crock! Of course it's a money grab, they need all that revenue to produce those informative brochures they'll stick under our wipers.

COW should get some new PR staff.

Up 19 Down 48

FracasMike on May 24, 2014 at 6:45 pm

Not a fan of the cameras… however, to all you whiners out there who complain about there not being enough parking and how you have the right to drive and not worry about a ticket, try to walk/ride a bike/take the bus - slow your life down a bit and get healthier. If your first rebuff is to say "because it's too damn cold", then maybe it's time to shape up and ship out and realize you just ain't made for this climate - you might be better suited for balmy Vancouver. Reality is it's a privilege to drive and you are privileged to live in such beautiful surroundings, hug a tree and save a few litres of CO2 while you're at it.

Think they should make some car pool parking spots where people can park all day. As much as I'm not a fan of the cameras, at least if they're going to move forward with them, they could enforce such a car pool parking programme.

Up 51 Down 5

Idiocy on May 24, 2014 at 9:11 am

Why not make the COW staff parking open to the public?

Does Pruden have free parking at work? Does the mayor??

Up 25 Down 65

FracasMike on May 24, 2014 at 7:17 am

Boo hoo. There is ample parking if you learn to walk a few blocks, or better yet bike. You might be healthier. If you moan about the weather and being too cold, maybe you should live somewhere else - obviously you are not fit for Northern living. However, I do recognize the need at times to drive downtown, so I think there should be all day free parking for those who car pool downtown.

People get a grip on life seriously. Can't wait to see the amount of thumbs down on this one.

Up 35 Down 16

Josey Wales on May 23, 2014 at 10:16 am

Since big brother now resides here, perhaps we can install some cameras in some public offices? Ya know just to "keep track of trends" like where is everybody?...why has the office emptied before the days end?...who does the many many coffee runs and for whom? Maybe we can, since no expenses are spared up here for surveillance of it's citizens...we could have say telemetry for our public officials?

Giving us critical data such as heartbeats, BP, stress levels, core temperature etc.

Then we can get a more clear picture of which trees within the epic forest that is our civic bureaucracy...we can cull.

This town really sucks these days...just like every other town in any country, say Manila?

Certainly not the Whitehorse I knew.

In short...tax grab and nothing else but to vacuum the coins outta our pockets that SIMA, F0S, TOYA, Ski-greenies, PC Crusaders...have yet too.

For years I've been calling those meters SIMA piggy banks.

I

Up 38 Down 6

Bob on May 23, 2014 at 8:36 am

Whitehorse needs more all-day parking, plenty of people driving into downtown for work have nowhere to go. The free lots fill up quickly, and even though my building has a private parking lot, there's a huge waiting list for spots ... couldn't park in there if I wanted to! Transit would be a meaningful solution if there was service past 7pm/better service on weekends. Impossible to have a life after work if you're running to get the last bus home. Just not viable.

Up 43 Down 11

Salar on May 23, 2014 at 8:03 am

Just a pack of shylocks.....can't the Yukon stay simple and NOT southern?

Up 43 Down 3

bad memory of last 'upgrade' on May 23, 2014 at 7:50 am

When the brand new meters were put in front of the Whitepass building I got a ticket the first day when they were NOT YET WORKING! I put my money in, and the screen kept showing 0:00. I brought the ticket to the city explaining that they were not up and running right, and they told me tough, pay it anyway. It was so incredibly obnoxious I never forgot it. The hours I spent talking on the phone and this went right to the top if you can imagine, and writing letters and details far outweighed the small fine, but the point was that the city was wrong and they would not capitulate no matter what. Finally after an outrageous amount of effort on my part, they gave up the fight.

Take this as a warning, City. If people come in during the first day, or even the first week, and state that this new system did not work correctly, you should give them the benefit of the doubt instead of calling them a liar. Technology does screw up, especially when systems are brand new. I still remember the smug power tripping that went on in my case, and repeatedly being treated like a liar when I was and am an honest citizen.

Up 31 Down 18

Always a Yukoner on May 23, 2014 at 7:26 am

What a waste of tax payers money, getting to lazy to walk and check, what next!!!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.