Photo by Whitehorse Star
Community Services Minister John Streicker
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Community Services Minister John Streicker
Community Services Minister John Streicker found himself enmeshed in controversy during a legislative debate on the emergency act after an email fiasco Tuesday.
Community Services Minister John Streicker found himself enmeshed in controversy during a legislative debate on the emergency act after an email fiasco Tuesday.
He wasn’t the only high-profile MLA under fire. The controversy also threatened to involve the Speaker of the legislature.
The assembly was poised to debate a motion to establish an all-party committee to examine whether the Civil Emergency Management Act needs to be overhauled after its use over the past nine months to handle the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Yukon Party had been strenuously resisting the inclusion of Streicker on the committee.
Party representatives argued it would be a conflict of interest, although Streicker would be called as a witness before the committee, the party said.
Party leader Currie Dixon said Streicker’s inclusion would be akin to allowing him to “grade his own report card.”
The debate took an interesting – and embarrassing – turn after Streicker “inadvertently” sent an email to a Yukon Party official Tuesday morning outlining research and suggestions to his Liberal colleagues as to how the debate should be handled.
Streicker told an afternoon media scrum he had been researching issues involving the formation of the committee when he made the error.
Once a fellow cabinet minister pointed out the mistake, Streicker said, he released the information to NDP officials as a matter of courtesy.
Yukon Party MLAs, including House Leader Stacey Hassard, pounced on the issue during question period.
They bombarded Streicker and the Liberals with accusations that he and the government were trying to exert undue influence in the matter.
The emails, Hassard alleged, highlighted how Streicker allegedly manipulated the process to ensure his inclusion on the committee.
Streicker answered questions on the issue during the media scrum. He said the situation was personally and professionally embarrassing for him.
“(Monday) night, I was working on the selected committee motion I brought forward,” he said.
“I was looking at past committees, how they were struck. I made an error and sent it to the Yukon Party.
“Anytime I make a misstep, I’m pretty hard on myself. So yeah, I was pretty chagrined. I’m pretty proud of the words I wrote.
“I think it’s a good evaluation of the situation. I hate when I make mistakes. I think we all do.”
Streicker also sent the email to Speaker Nils Clarke, which he acknowledged was another mistake.
The Speaker, usually elected from the governing party, is expected to maintain a strict neutrality and maintain independence from the legislative process.
Clarke nominally is a Liberal member, but must maintain an arm’s-length relationship.
Streicker said he had no problem with the idea of a committee. He always expected the government’s actions with the emergency act would be reviewed at some point.
He said his research indicated it wasn’t uncommon to have a cabinet minister on such a committee.
“It’s my job to research this,” he said.
Dixon said the Yukon Party believes it’s “inappropriate” for the minister to be a member of the committee evaluating his own work.
“(Tuesday) morning, we learned two things. The minister clearly has his fingers all over this thing, and has been orchestrating the government’s response. He’s been co-ordinating the agenda and preparing the notes.
“We think this whole process is a sham. We think this whole thing is flawed, and we think it’s pretty clear he’s been co-ordinating with the Liberals and he’s been co-ordinating with the Speaker.
“That throws into question the neutrality of the Speaker. You don’t plan for a game with the referee in the room. That’s not how it’s supposed to work.”
NDP Leader Kate White was also concerned about the role of the Speaker in the matter.
“The issue here is that this isn’t the first time the Speaker has been incorporated into an issue,” she said.
“We’ve had concerns before when he’s interjected himself into the process. He’s represented the Liberal government before in advertising and giving speeches at events.
“I appreciate mistakes happen, but it shows something in combination with other events.”
Ultimately, the Liberals used their majority to appoint Streicker to the committee. It will report back to the legislature with its findings next summer.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (20)
Up 3 Down 8
Nathan Living on Dec 15, 2020 at 12:22 am
John made an honest mistake so time to move on.
I wish the GY could loan John to the city for a short period of time since mayor and council seem to be faltering.
Up 10 Down 6
Juniper Jackson on Dec 14, 2020 at 12:11 am
The only time I have met Mr. Strieker was to receive a medal from him, and he did not know what he was giving it to me for. He said, Congratulations, and whispered, what's this for anyway? He was not joking. That being said, as much as I'd like to pin him to a wall for this, I don't really know what this is. Print the EMAIL so I, and others, know exactly what we are talking about. Thanks
Up 27 Down 7
TMYK on Dec 11, 2020 at 2:56 pm
@ Patti Yes, I do expect someone who has taken an oath to be non-partisan to uphold that oath. It comes with the job of being Speaker of the House as well as a significant paycheck from the taxpayers.
Up 21 Down 5
CJ2 on Dec 11, 2020 at 1:50 pm
I don't think John Streiker should be on a committee that is discussing an overhaul of the Emergency Measures Act. He could say all that he has to say as a guest of the committee and could make a valuable contribution that way. I don't know if it's a matter of "grading his own work", but he's just too close to it. I think he'd spend a lot of time rationalizing some of the implementation, such as the key one to not bring the decision to invoke the act before the legislature. Inevitably, there will be clashes between members instead of dialogue when he receives any critiques. I can see it taking up a lot of oxygen. In the end, there is a risk that the scales are tipped amend the act to respond to his own particular concerns, or the perception of that.
I don't even know why it matters if it's happened before that a cabinet minister was on a committee. The Emergency Measures act itself has never been used once, never mind for almost a full year.
But it honestly didn't occur to me that he was engineering his own position on it. I really thought it was another unfortunate decision of the Liberal caucus that I don't agree with. Now it looks altogether like a one-man show.
Up 31 Down 6
Salt on Dec 11, 2020 at 9:36 am
No matter the ruling party, principled, ethical governance is extremely rare. Which is why access to power, such that CEMA provides, should be much more tightly restricted than it is now. Having Streicker on the committee is a farce.
Up 13 Down 20
Artemis N. Falkmore on Dec 10, 2020 at 11:33 pm
This story should be summed up as:
Man copied the wrong names in a email and sent to wrong colleagues and did his homework end of story.
Up 10 Down 18
Snowman on Dec 10, 2020 at 9:22 pm
@justsayin
You realize this committee doesn't exist to "give grades" or pass judgement on whether the Minister did a good job right? The purpose of the committee is to determine what CEMA measures worked, which ones didn't, how can they perhaps tweak them to make them better etc. and who better to do that than the Minister who has been most deeply involved with it.
I think its very telling that Dixon and the Yukon Party want this committee to pass some kind of partisan judgement on the Minister or government. They are more interested in scoring partisan points for the upcoming election rather than legitimately trying to make CEMA better for when it is used again in the future.
Judgement on how the Minister and govt did during the pandemic will be given in the election. If they did bad, they will be tossed out. If they did good, they will likely be given another mandate. This is how the democratic system works.
Up 13 Down 13
Patti Eyre on Dec 10, 2020 at 4:56 pm
@tmyk so Nils runs as a Liberal is elected as a Liberal and you expect me to believe he is suppose to be independent / non-partisan? You have lost contact with reality!
Up 41 Down 11
TMYK on Dec 10, 2020 at 3:31 pm
@ Patti your Liberal colours are showing. This shows that the Liberals are sharing notes with the Speaker of the House, which is a huge no-no in our system as the Speaker is supposed to be non-partisan.
Up 32 Down 8
JustSayin' on Dec 10, 2020 at 3:19 pm
@Patti Eyre
Yes, I have sent the wrong email to the wrong address and dealt with the fallout from it. However, the issue is, Minster Streicker wants to be on a committee which will judge his actions in response to EMA. Wouldn't it be nice if we all were allowed to be on a hiring or review committee for our actions? Heck, how about the head the head of the committee? I agree a Liberal should be apart of the committee however, it should not be the person who was responsible for implementing the policy... Could you imagine if an accused person could be part of a jury for their own crimes? IF the committee is going to be lead by Streicker than don't waste taxpayers dollars. This is not going to yield constructive criticism which will help the Yukon if there are future EMA events. . Streicker wants to write his own narrative and is going to do so; typical of narcissistic personalities.
Up 23 Down 32
Patti Eyre on Dec 10, 2020 at 11:21 am
He sent an email to the wrong address, and now we’re all supposed to take a huge crap on a mistake like that? Come on, people. Truly, is this the best criticism going today?
Up 44 Down 15
Wilf Carter on Dec 10, 2020 at 9:26 am
Can some tell me why liberals run government like dictators? My way or the highway? They will not listen to Yukoners.
Up 26 Down 12
Darrin on Dec 10, 2020 at 6:37 am
Professor John strikes again.
Up 21 Down 29
Yukoner32 on Dec 9, 2020 at 8:02 pm
hahaha poor John. I've done this a few times unfortunately so I feel your pain. We're all human buddy, don't sweat it!
Up 30 Down 5
Fred Norris on Dec 9, 2020 at 4:28 pm
Is this email available to the public?
It should be, as a matter of courtesy.......
Up 30 Down 9
Just Sayin' on Dec 9, 2020 at 4:19 pm
Umm, Mr. Dixon, did you not know there are no longer grades in report cards, but terms such as approaching, meeting, achieving. Striker will obviously grade himself as exceeding expectations.
Up 30 Down 19
Wilf Carter on Dec 9, 2020 at 4:04 pm
Just goes to show how bad of a job liberals are doing in running the Yukon government.
John do the Honourable thing and resign as minister because you have destroyed your own credibility and liberal respect for governance in Yukon.
Up 33 Down 10
JC on Dec 9, 2020 at 3:59 pm
And he will be forgiven. And business as usual. It works for JT and the Federal Libs.
Up 43 Down 12
TMYK on Dec 9, 2020 at 2:50 pm
@BnR to be fair, every Liberal thinks they are the smartest person in the room. It's the "trust us we know what's best for you" mentality.
Up 60 Down 21
BnR on Dec 9, 2020 at 2:06 pm
John Streicker aka smartest man in the Yukon.