Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

President and CEO of Yukon Energy Andrew Hall

Mayo Road dropped as battery storage site

Yukon Energy announced Tuesday it’s eliminating the North Klondike Highway site as an option for its new battery storage project.

By Chuck Tobin on December 16, 2020

Yukon Energy announced Tuesday it’s eliminating the North Klondike Highway site as an option for its new battery storage project.

It also announced it was beginning the process of attracting qualified firms to carry out the project by issuing a request for proposals which will close Feb. 15.

“In Stage 1, vendors are being asked to submit a proposal demonstrating their technical capability, experience and corporate capacity to deliver a battery designed to meet Yukon Energy’s operational requirements and Yukon’s northern climate,” says the press release.

“Qualified vendors chosen in Stage 1 of the process will be invited to submit a proposal in Stage 2, which will evaluate vendors based on technical specifications, price, First Nations benefits and other components.”

The release points out the North Klondike Highway site adjacent to the Takhini Substation was eliminated because of public opposition, leaving two sites along Robert Service Way as the remaining options.

The intent is to have the battery operational by the end of 2022, says the release.

“It feels great to reach this critical milestone,” Andrew Hall, the president and CEO of Yukon Energy, said in a statement.

“We knew when we started this project that the most difficult and time-consuming part of it would be sourcing the right kind of battery for our unique needs and climate.

“Issuing this RFP now sets us up to have the battery installed and in service by the end of 2022 like we always planned.”

The battery is identified in the Crown corporation’s 10-Year Renewable Electricity Plan to meet the territory’s growing energy needs. The cost is estimated at between $27 million and $30 million.

The project calls for a seven-megawatt storage battery that can be charged during periods of excess generation in off-peak hours and used to help meet the load in periods of peak demand, particularly in the winter.

The release notes once installed, the battery storage unit will be the largest in the North and among the largest in Canada.

“The new seven-megawatt battery is a critical investment in Yukon Energy’s ability to meet the growing demand for electricity and to secure Yukon’s energy future,” Energy, Mines and Resources Minister Ranj Pillai said in a ministerial statement to the legislature Tuesday.

“The battery will help maximize the use of renewable electricity to meet peak demands for power, burn less diesel fuel, and improve the reliability of our grid. The battery will also provide stability to the grid as new intermittent renewables are added.”

Pillai said the battery is a critical building block to support future renewable electricity projects and Yukon Energy’s goal of generating an average of 97-per-cent renewable electricity by 2030.

It’s expected the battery will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from diesel and natural gas generation by 20,000 tonnes during its 20-year life.

Pillai also tabled Yukon Energy’s 10-year Renewable Electricity Plan Technical Report.

Both of the remaining site options are located on First Nation settlement and will be subject to a lease with the First Nation.

Settlement land was chosen as part of Yukon Energy’s commitment to include First Nations in economic development and investment opportunities whenever possible, the corporation has explained in the past.

One of the sites is across Robert Service Way from Yukon Energy, in the area the city uses for a snow dump. The site is owned by the Ta’an Kwäch’än Council.

The other is at the top of the roadway, near the intersection of Robert Service Way and the Alaska Highway. The site is owned by the Kwanlin Dün First Nation.

Tuesday’s release indicates site selection will be announced once the lease arrangements with each First Nation have been finalized.

The seven-megawatt battery is designed to provide as much electricity as generated by the largest hydro unit at the Whitehorse Rapids Dam, so that if the unit were to go down, the battery could be used to supply an equivalent amount of electricity temporarily.

The battery unit will be able to provide 40 megawatt hours of electricity, or 20 megawatt hours for two hours or five megawatts for eight hours.

The unit would be available at the flick of a switch in case of a power outage.

The federal government has committed $16.5 million for the project, with Yukon Energy picking up the remaining $10 million to $13.5 million.

Operational costs at both sites are estimated at $214,000 annually, with an additional $214,000 paid annually in property taxes to the City of Whitehorse.

Not having to pay property taxes to the city was one of the advantages of the Klondike Highway site, as it’s outside city limits.

Comments (18)

Up 5 Down 2

Leroy Nelson on Dec 21, 2020 at 10:21 am

Another good question for Mr. Hall would be what was one of the recent heinous rate increases actually spent on when it was for infrastructure. The only infrastructure that was mentioned was a repair at the Aishihik site. This is certainly not transparent and far from any accountability that I'm aware of. Who are these mysterious board members that approve this stuff never to be heard about again? The public was consulted, what a farce.

Up 11 Down 1

Nathan Living on Dec 20, 2020 at 5:06 pm

Micro nuclear is a solution and it's almost green and you can start small and add to it.
Submarines use nuclear and people actually live in them. Please stop the nuclear fear porn and look at it as a viable solution. First Nations do not want dams and reservoirs.

Conservation is great and trying to get everything out of existing facilities is commendable.
Micro nuclear is close to being green.

Up 18 Down 11

Jon on Dec 20, 2020 at 8:59 am

It's so funny to see such thoughts like, "Isn't there private land someone will lease?" in the same breath as "Why are we building on FN land?"
FNs are private stakeholders, they own that land, but I guess they aren't the "right kind" of private landowner to appease some of you lot.

Wonder why that is.... yep, just breaking my brain over here pondering the mystery of this unexplainable perspective XD.

Up 16 Down 9

Jon on Dec 20, 2020 at 8:54 am

Opinions should be kept to oneself, methinks.

If you don't want to lease land from people who own it, maybe stop caving to NIMBY settlers that want everything at 0 cost... oh wait, that describes the complainers here, too.
Lol forever at the pearl-clutching and fist shaking at the contradictions made real by the intersection of your prejudices and privilege. Stay classy, Yukon.

Up 11 Down 2

Anton on Dec 20, 2020 at 4:31 am

My gut feelings about this guy were that he was full of it and more interested in his bottom line legacy than the well being future of Yukon power customers when he stated, "other places pay more for power than here". My initial feelings have bore out to be true.
Seven customers you protest had nothing to do with this decision as it was pre-ordained by Mr. Hall who knows it's a lot cheaper to put all your eggs in one basket and force others out of a recreation area. He'll be long gone in a couple of years just like the last one.

Up 12 Down 0

EJ on Dec 19, 2020 at 11:30 pm

Wow I actually agree with Sheepchaser on something ha ha. Next generation nuclear is definitely the way to go until some more revolutionary source of power is found.
On a side note, NIMBYism in this territory is the worst. So what if a few people oppose it? There will be people opposing it anywhere they try to go! I bet many of us would like to remove developments around us so that our properties would be more aesthetically pleasing. But guess what? We live in the real world and understand that development is inevitable. If you don't like it, move to one of our many remote communities.

Up 22 Down 4

My Oppinion on Dec 18, 2020 at 10:32 pm

I have 5 Acres I will rent you. Or maybe I am not ethnic enough?

It says in the article "Yukon Energy’s commitment to include First Nations in economic development and investment opportunities whenever possible". Is there such a policy for born third generation Yukoner? OK I guess I already knew the answer to that question. Our advantage is only to pay for such policies.

Up 13 Down 4

My Oppinion on Dec 18, 2020 at 10:24 pm

Put the Battery on Fish Lake Road near the Power Project there. Not on FN land.

Up 27 Down 5

My Oppinion on Dec 18, 2020 at 10:22 pm

So the seven people that didn't want the Battery on the Mayo Rd were enough to stop it? Let me be the first to tell you that I do not want to pay the First Nation rent. Let's see how long it takes to get 6 more.

Up 14 Down 4

Crunch on Dec 18, 2020 at 7:27 pm

Name me one thing that is as inefficient as a battery when put under a large draw? This is not a test or a joke. It's a battery. Would people please wake up and demand that the right decisions are being made? Just because you're getting oodles of money from the Turdo does not make this right. Again, only in Yukon.

Up 17 Down 1

Sheepchaser on Dec 18, 2020 at 8:43 am

Three of these batteries and one Micro Modular Reactor = Yukon energy needs solved. However, you’d need to educate the electorate sufficiently for them not to assume an MMR is a future Chernobyl. Good luck with that.

Up 21 Down 2

Far from the eyes. on Dec 18, 2020 at 7:33 am

"eliminated because of public opposition"
There is strong public opposition to the 7 mammoth generators being installed and put in service IN THE TOWN of Faro.
Yes in the townsite!!!! How does that grab you Whitehorse?
However you just learned about it. We are not covered up here.
Far from the eyes!

Up 29 Down 7

comen sense on Dec 17, 2020 at 11:44 am

Power has already increased a lot so lease land and make this venture more expensive. Put it on crown land and stop being a** kissing Liberals.

Up 17 Down 2

David Griffiths on Dec 17, 2020 at 9:58 am

I did go and read about SEARL generators. Interesting but I think we need a solution that's is viable by the year 2022 not 2122.

Up 28 Down 7

JC on Dec 16, 2020 at 4:44 pm

Is FN land the only option? There must be many private land owners willing to lease land for this project. Have any of them been approached?

Up 7 Down 7

Why not buy all on Dec 16, 2020 at 4:31 pm

of the 13 lots that just opened up at the tank farm It would stop all the b!tching.

Up 62 Down 17

Max Mack on Dec 16, 2020 at 2:58 pm

"First Nations benefits"
That is pretty much the only criteria that seems to really drive Hall's policies. He and the rest of the Liberal elite that pilot Yukon's energy policies.
It doesn't matter that the rest of us will continue to pay and pay and pay for the exorbitant costs of "green" energy while FNs milk this cash cow.

Up 31 Down 17

Matthew on Dec 16, 2020 at 2:14 pm

Oh please.. batteries are old tech! Not to mention lithium's one of the worst substances to mine. How about doing something good for once. If you're reading this research "searl generator"! Free, clean, unlimited power! They don't want it because they actually don't give a shite about "green energy".

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.