Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

Abby Cuenza, the supervisor of the Whitehorse Rapids Fishway releases the only chinook salmon, a male hatchery fish, in the tank on Tuesday.

Little cause for optimism about salmon numbers

The return of Yukon River chinook and chum salmon continues to look bleak.

By Chuck Tobin on August 26, 2020

The return of Yukon River chinook and chum salmon continues to look bleak.

With the run of chinook past the sonar near Eagle, Alaska downriver from the Yukon-Alaska border almost over, the count of 33,005 as of Monday is still well below the minimum escapement goal in the Yukon of 42,500.

In light of the anticipated poor return along the mainstem, the territory’s Yukon Salmon-Subcommittee two weeks ago asked First Nations to stop fishing for chinook.

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game is reporting this year’s return of fall chum salmon is also coming in very poor, and perhaps could be the lowest return on record based on the count so far at the Pilot Station sonar near the mouth of the river.

The minimum escapement goal in the Yukon for fall chum is set at 70,000 to 104,000, but the current prediction by the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) is for a return of fewer than 62,500.

The escapement goal on the Porcupine River is set at 41,350 to 52,250, but DFO is currently predicting a return of fewer than 12,500.

DFO’s Steve Smith explained this morning they planned to discuss the fall chum return with First Nations on a conference call this afternoon.

Ultimately, it will be up to the First Nations how they manage their chum fisheries, he said.

“At this point, we are not projected to meet the bottom end of the escapement goal, so technically, no harvest is available,” he said. “So we expect them to manage accordingly.”

The federal department has closed all other fishing for fall chum, including the commercial fishery.

Alaska has also closed the fall chum fishery, including its subsistence food fishery in response to the low numbers.

In order to meet escapement goals on both sides of the border, authorities say they need to see between 300,000 and 600,000 chum enter the river.

The current prediction by Alaska is a total return of fewer than 200,000 fall chum.

In the Yukon last year, the total harvest of fall chum was estimated at 3,759: 1,728 by the commercial fishery on the mainstem near Dawson; approximately 2,000 by the First Nation food fishery, with half being taken on the mainstem and the other half on the Porcupine River.

“Fall chum salmon are typically dominated by age-4 fish; however, the 2016 parent year that produced that age class has shown extremely poor survival in chum salmon runs throughout the state,” reads the most recent update from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.

The poor return of chinook this year is being reflected in numbers showing up at the Whitehorse Rapids Fish Ladder.

As of this morning, 171 chinook had climbed the ladder when the 10-year average to Aug. 25 is 1,026.

Fall chum do not migrate as far as Whitehorse on the mainstem.

The largest return of chinook since the ladder opened in the late 1950s, following the completion of the Whitehorse Rapids Dam, was 2,962, recorded in 1996.

The lowest return since the late 1980s, when chinook reared at the hatchery began contributing to the run, was 299, recorded in 2008.

Comments (10)

Up 2 Down 3

Spud on Aug 31, 2020 at 6:14 pm

The main vehicle for the management of salmon in Yukon is the Yukon Salmon Committee. Unfortunately the committee has been rendered ineffective with a chair that was a former employee of the department of fisheries and oceans. How is the committee supposed to do its work, when being critical of DFO is necessary at this time??

Up 11 Down 3

Adam on Aug 31, 2020 at 10:01 am

First of all, most salmon of Yukon origin have had their adipose fin clipped before they leave the hatchery, so they should be easily identifiable as Cdn. They only travel in the Yukon River coming up. Alaskans should net them at the mouth of tributaries, not on the shores. Secondly, the large ones have all been netted over the years and along with their genetic capability to reproduce. Net mesh sizes were diminished but a bit late. Thirdly, the Alaska Fish and Game did not escort and protect the major pulse of migrating salmon due to Covid restrictions and therefore many Alaskan netters took advantage of this situation. Fourthly, some Yukoners are still playing the catch and release scenario as that isn't illegal. They tire out the salmon before they spawn. Fifthly, too much talk, not enough walk, etc...
Salmon use the path of least resistance going up the river, no matter how high the water.

Up 19 Down 2

Atom on Aug 29, 2020 at 4:46 pm

I've always had hope humans would work out a solution. No wild salmon in 10 years is despicable.
We suck! Well....managers and politicians in charge of fisheries suck!

Up 22 Down 1

Nathan Living on Aug 28, 2020 at 6:48 pm

I view the US and Canadian managers among the greatest threat to Yukon River salmon
We were told 77,000 Chinook salmon were on the way to Canada but only 33,000 arrived below Eagle Alaska and that community fished them and DFO did not close Canadian aboriginal fisheries.

The first step should be to rule out subsistence harvest in the US as the cause of the low return to Canada.
If they took 44,000 plus the harvest in Eagle Alaska they also took roughly the same number of US origin fish. That's a lot if fish folks and we do have an international agreement which is clearly not working.

Let's get to the bottom of this. Why is precautionary management such an obscure concept.
If it's not aggressive fishing then please tell me what it is please because I want to ensure these fish do not go extinct.

Up 14 Down 2

Charlie's Aunt on Aug 28, 2020 at 4:52 pm

@N of 60, valid point. They do monitor numbers at Pilot Station. Several miles from mouth and there are a few communities before Pilot Station but small populations so doubt they are the cause of low numbers. A count at actual mouth would give a better picture. With very few exceptions and excluding locally sourced fish, when you turn over a package labeled frozen wild caught Pacific Salmon, it usually says on back 'Product of China.' Too bad they don't include the tag # and origin of fish as well!

Up 28 Down 5

Groucho d'North on Aug 28, 2020 at 2:39 pm

The salmon runs have been depleting for the past 25 years - more so in the past decade and many have advocated both the Canadian and US governments get involved to prevent what we are witnessing now. Yes, there have been boards and committees created to deal with the declining salmon numbers and all that resulted was some reports confirming what most people already knew: commercial fisheries are taking too much, subsitance fishers have been taking too much and politcians are loath to get involved for fear of pissing off potential voters. So climate change and CO2 got tossed into the blame game for some purpose of distraction. Management of the fisheries has been a complete and utter failure on both sides of the border. Such a shame.

Up 25 Down 4

North_of_60 on Aug 28, 2020 at 2:22 am

Why isn't the Whitehorse Star reporting how many salmon enter the Yukon River at it's mouth? Knowing how many come across the Yukon-Alaska border is rather useless without knowing the total entering the river. Accurate reporting would tell us what percent of the Yukon River salmon actually make it to the Yukon, n'est-ce pas?

Up 20 Down 5

comen sense on Aug 27, 2020 at 1:43 pm

Is there nets across the Yukon River in Alaska? How can they monitor that - something's fishy.

Up 39 Down 2

Davis on Aug 27, 2020 at 8:45 am

This is disappointing news but not surprising. Seems that every year the run numbers are always lower than we want. Every year Yukon releases thousands of fry back into the system then every year Alaska nets all the returning salmon before they make it back into Yukon where their spawning grounds are. Good deal for Alaska, bad deal for Yukon...

Up 17 Down 25

Matthew on Aug 27, 2020 at 6:16 am

Wait... didn't liberals approve GM Salmon? Salmon that is GENETICALLY MODIFIED for human consumption. Did anyone even know that? In 1 year Canadians ate over 4Tonnes of it, and it wasn't even labeled! So why do we care about fish counts anyways if gov is producing salmon in petrie dishes.. (Sarcasm) all hail king Trudeau!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.