Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Photo Submitted

AN EXPENSIVE PROBLEM – Seen in this aerial photo, firefighters battle the stubborn blaze at the Whitehorse landfill. Photo courtesy GOVERNMENT OF YUKON

Landfill fire may cost city up to $2 million

A total of $2 million could come out of city reserves to deal with the fire that has been burning at the landfill since last Wednesday.

By Stephanie Waddell on June 26, 2018

A total of $2 million could come out of city reserves to deal with the fire that has been burning at the landfill since last Wednesday.

At Monday evening’s council meeting, members approved the first two readings of a bylaw for the spending.

A special council meeting was scheduled for late this afternoon to vote on third reading in order to expedite the process.

Under city procedures, council cannot vote on all three readings of a bylaw during the same meeting.

As Peter O’Blenes, the city’s director of infrastructure and operations, told council in a report last night: “The fire constitutes a bona-fide emergency because of risk to public health, city property and the environment.

“For that reason, emergency funding for initial expenses has been approved by the city manager (Linda Rapp) pursuant to the city’s purchasing and sales policy.

“There are significant unforeseen expenses related to ongoing management of this fire that were not provided for in the 2018-2021 capital budget.”

Whitehorse firefighters first responded to the blaze when it was noticed at 10:22 p.m. last Wednesday in the construction and demolition waste area of the landfill. Much of the debris is from the old F.H. Collins Secondary School, which was demolished in 2017.

The fire had been contained, but flared up again early Saturday morning, with smoke evident in parts of the city.

Along with city firefighters, volunteers from numerous departments outside of Whitehorse assisted in the response. They were joined by staff with the Yukon government’s fire marshall’s office and Emergency Measures Organization. Local contractors have assisted with heavy equipment and such.

The city is also working with a consultant from B.C. on the fire.

Warnings were issued last weekend asking locals not to visit the landfill. They were also asked to stay inside in areas where there was smoke, and to allow fire trucks through the area of Kopper King and on Centennial Street in Porter Creek, where water was available and being pumped into trucks.

As of Monday, the fire was contained below the surface, with additional soil being added and officials monitoring the situation. Carbon monoxide levels coming from the ground are being tracked.

The fire may burn out beneath the surface over a number of weeks, in which case it would cost less than if oxygen gets in and it flares up again.

O’Blenes also told reporters last night that water could be used in bore holes to quicken suppression efforts beneath the surface. Those decisions, though, will depend on what happens in the coming days and weeks.

Before voting on the first two readings last night, Coun. Dan Boyd questioned the expense.

While he understands the city is in a bit of a “holding pattern” with the fire right now, he still wanted a more detailed breakdown of the costs.

O’Blenes replied by noting that the estimate is “just that,” an estimate without the full costs known.

He said it’s believed the fire has cost the city about $100,000 per day so far.

It’s anticipated it will reach $1 million even if the fire is able to burn out below the surface without needing more suppression efforts.

The costs will drop as time goes on, but there will be ongoing monitoring needed for some time. The city also has spotters keeping an eye on things now.

The $2-million expense was proposed to be approved in case more efforts – which could include digging further into the area – are required outside of the ongoing monitoring.

Questioned by Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu, Rapp confirmed the spending will come from city reserves, noting this situation shows why it’s good to set aside money in reserves.

Rapp also told council that “at this point,” it’s not anticipated to have an impact on property tax rates.

However, she acknowledged that it’s still “early days,” and the city will have more clarity on the situation before it begins looking at taxes for 2019. (Property owners have until 5 p.m. July 3 to pay their 2018 tax bills.)

Boyd also expressed concerns over the tire pile that accumulates at the landfill before they’re shipped Outside.

While the tires aren’t near the blaze, Boyd suggested it would be prudent to consider the issue of the tires.

He pointed out it’s the Yukon government that is responsible for the tires and having them shipped out. The landfill was the site of a significant, stubborn tire fire approximately 25 years ago.

Coun. Rob Fendrick and Mayor Dan Curtis highlighted the work of all those involved in dealing with the current blaze.

As Fendrick pointed out, it had the potential to escalate into something more serious, but didn’t.

Curtis said it was “all hands on deck,” with help from the territory and other fire departments in addition to the city’s staff.

Looking ahead, O’Blenes said the city will be studying the best practices of other regions to see if any improvements can be made.

Asked if that may include extending water services to the landfill, he said that may be part of the review.

Coun. Samson Hartland was absent from last night’s meeting.

Comments (12)

Up 1 Down 0

CJ on Jul 2, 2018 at 8:39 pm

@Total Cost, You seem to want to believe there's only two positions here -- as in, those people who question the estimated total don't think any expense is justified, and those people who only want to pat firefighters on the back.

Two million for a few days does seem like a lot of money. I think it warrants some digging into the numbers. The city and YTG are supposed to be somewhat prepared for emergencies like this. It's about time we asked questions about where they get their numbers and what kind of emergency funds they have. I would be seriously upset if my property taxes go up for a landfill issue, while they were so all in for the consolidation building project -- Dan Curtis' famous "fairytale". And also when they will entertain very little discussion about how waste management is being handled.

Up 0 Down 7

Total Cost on Jun 29, 2018 at 12:33 pm

I'm astonished by the number of individuals claiming that some of these employees get paid to be there anyway. When you are away from your home and family, working 24-26 hours straight in 25+ degree heat, encountering flames several stories high, fixing a problem you did not create - I hope you don't expect to be paid for the job you are doing, for the vacation you are giving up, for the time away from your family on your day off.

As for the costs... last I checked, fuel isn't free, breathing apparatus aren't either. Renting equipment, bringing in private industry etc. all comes at a cost.

If this was "allowed to burn" as some are suggesting it could have been, would you still feel this way if that fire spread in to the surrounding wilderness? If all of Porter Creek was suddenly subject to a wildfire?

Let's sit back are rationally think through this before we start suggesting that this is a waste of money.

Up 10 Down 0

north_of_60 on Jun 28, 2018 at 2:35 pm

With the exception of "Local contractors" who "assisted with heavy equipment and such", the fire was mostly dealt with by government employees, who already get paid to do their job.

Who is the 2 million going to pay? Assistance with heavy equipment shouldn't have cost millions, so "and such" must be very expensive these days.

Without any details of expenditures it sure looks like a "let's give tax money to our friends" scam.
"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." -- Rahm Emanuel

Up 6 Down 1

ProScience Greenie on Jun 28, 2018 at 12:58 pm

You're kind of wrong on that BnR as lots of non-CoW residents see tons of their Fed and YG taxes go to Whitehorse. Also there is the money spent at CoW businesses on goods and services. Also CoW user fees. So the non-resident financial contributions are significant yet there is no say on how it is spent, distributed by the CoW powers that be or sadly wasted. I feel no guilt in sounding off about waste, graft, nepotism, etc., and wish more residents and non-residents would do the same to force accountability and transparency on CoW politicians and the powers that be.

Up 6 Down 1

My Opinion on Jun 27, 2018 at 8:56 pm

@PSG
No, all of Yukon's Garbage is shipped here now. Check it out.

Up 3 Down 2

Peter D. on Jun 27, 2018 at 8:09 pm

No problem as we have an emergency surplus to handle just such occurrences.

Up 4 Down 3

BnR on Jun 27, 2018 at 8:08 pm

"Sorry Whitehorse but it's your dump fire, you pay for it. Stop inflating the cost to get YTG and the people outside city limits to pay for it"
For god sakes PSG. I take it your live outside CofW limits?
You happily come to the city, take advantage of the infrastrure, yet pay no city taxes?
You happily live here and reap the largess of fed transfer payemts?
Watch out for the glass walls in your big glass house bro.

Up 10 Down 4

ProScience Greenie on Jun 27, 2018 at 11:25 am

Sorry Whitehorse but it's your dump fire, you pay for it. Stop inflating the cost to get YTG and the people outside city limits to pay for it.

Up 0 Down 13

Peter G. on Jun 26, 2018 at 8:58 pm

Two million dollars sounds like a lot of money but thankfully our prudent council has an Emergency surplus contingency fund built up to draw on just for times like these.

Up 15 Down 1

Olaf Wolfe on Jun 26, 2018 at 6:32 pm

Seriously. 2 million? Something is wrong with the math here.
And if not, then everybody, at a managerial level, involved in this process should be held accountable. There is no way in hell that this fire cost 2 million dollars.

Up 14 Down 2

My Opinion on Jun 26, 2018 at 4:52 pm

A. It was mostly just wood, why didn't they just let it Burn?
B. Were they not going to pay the Fire Fighters anyway? Also were the trucks getting billed out? What kind of nonsense accounting is that?

Up 19 Down 2

TheTwoMillionDollarMan on Jun 26, 2018 at 4:22 pm

Oh dear, why not just take two million in non-sequential bills, and throw them on that fire. Silly people just plucking silly numbers out of the air - I guess the smoke must have got in their eyes during the process. Garbage story.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.