Whitehorse Daily Star

Gov't is ignoring Keno residents' concerns: MLA

In what has turned into a David and Goliath battle, t

By Jason Unrau on December 9, 2009

In what has turned into a David and Goliath battle, the plight of Keno City residents who contend they are being pushed aside by Alexco Resource Corp. and its plans for mining silver in the region, is being ignored by the Yukon government, says Liberal MLA Eric Fairclough.

"Residents of Keno were very disappointed in the government's handling of their concerns,” charged the Mayo-Tatchun MLA during Tuesday's question period.

"The government's response to every issue that has been raised is the same: no, no, no.”

Last March, Keno residents went public after learning Alexco would build a crusher 800 metres from the tiny community.

Company CEO Clynt Nauman insisted there had been "constructive dialogue” with Alexco's new neighbours.

Members of the small Yukon community said Alexco's proposal to build a processing plant less than a kilometre from their homes was made right under their noses.

"They gave us no indication of where it was to be located ... we became aware of the details for the first time in January (2009) and in my mind, this is entirely too late,” said Keno residents' spokesman Bob Wagner.

"This does not constitute consultation in my mind (so) I don't know what Mr. Nauman is referring to.”

Now Keno residents fear Alexco is planning to build an access road through the community; a portion of which would be on land currently occupied by four homes.

In a letter to the editor published in Tuesday's Star, Nauman assures that will not happen.

"Some residents continue to raise an issue that we are planning to route roads over homes that exist on our lot 960,” writes Nauman.

"We should be very clear that we never did plan to develop a road over homes in Keno City, and Keno residents are well aware of this.”

But Wagner's partner, Insa Schultenkotter, said she has seen a map that suggests otherwise, and added Alexco never stated its intentions one way or another.

"We never received in writing that they wouldn't (build this road), but there's a drawing and design so somebody has been thinking about it,” Schultenkotter told the Star this morning.

As both minister of Energy, Mines and Resources and Community Services, Archie Lang is in a perceived conflict of interest, according to Schultenkotter, and is taking Alexco's side while shirking his

responsibilities toward Keno City.

Lang was not yet the Mines minister last July when he refused Keno residents' attempt to establish an advisory council to represent the community's needs to the government.

"He always said we're too small to take responsibility,” Schultenkotter said. "These guys like Archie Lang, they want to be the big people who brought mining back to the territory at all costs”.

Back in the legislature, Lang denied the government had anything to do with the land transfer that included lot 960; part of a $400,000 court-structured sale in 2006 of 35 mine properties to Alexco.

"That was a court-ordered transfer,” he said. "It had nothing to do with the territorial government. That transfer of the assets of United Keno Hill to Alexco was a court-driven decision.”

The Mines and Community Services minister also promised to "work with (Keno City) to form a community association so we can have a conduit of information flowing.”

Comments (8)

Up 0 Down 0

Max on Dec 15, 2009 at 4:21 am

The people of Keno have valid concerns and those concerns are obviously being downplayed. Shame on Alexco, Government of Yukon and all permitting bodies.

The resulting health issues that will arise from the nearby operation of the plant and haul road should result in a very nice civil suit(s) against the Government someday (and mine operators, in the unlikely event they are still in business).

Up 0 Down 0

yvonne bessette on Dec 14, 2009 at 2:52 am

To me it is pretty clear that this small community is getting screwed big time. But, as we know by now, Alexco (or any other mining company) hands YTG a wish list, and Energy, Mines & Resources is anxious to delivery the gifts. Yes, good question, where was YESA? Under Energy, Mines & Resources fist, I assume.

Up 0 Down 0

Insa Schultenkotter on Dec 12, 2009 at 3:24 pm

He Geof Barrington,

Got news for you:

Keno City was never a mining town but a mining serving town. You really must get mixed up with Elsa, which IS the MINING town. It is aksi the town where the ore was milles, and adjacent to it the tailings are stored.

See, and since some people still don't get it: Keno people actually DO support mining, they just don't want to have their mill and tailings at our door step.

And I tell you if Alexco or YTG would buy us out, or reimburse us for our investment, we would be moving out.

And by the way, did Whitehorse not have some mines around?

How would you like to have a mill right in your backyard?

"Wake to the sound of crushing ore, .........."

Up 0 Down 0

francias pillman on Dec 11, 2009 at 11:16 am

Hey geoff. Your comment makes you look like a buffoon. Seriously give your head a shake, and you might get rid of some of that ignorance.

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on Dec 10, 2009 at 1:04 pm

This is interesting. Where was YESAB on this? Im to lazy to research it right now but still, all development must go through this process.

Up 0 Down 0

geof barrington on Dec 10, 2009 at 11:34 am

this is happening in Mine Country , not in whitehorse or marsh lake. this is not a park or a playground , its a mining town . if people dont like mining in this town they should either get used to it or move some where Nice

Up 0 Down 0

francias pillman on Dec 10, 2009 at 11:03 am

Well, the residents must know by now their voice dosent matter. So what is one to do? Block their roads, sabotage their equipment, do whatever is necessary. And I don't want people responding "oh you shouldn't do that" I ask you this, define democracy? Screwing around with this company is the only way they will get the hint.

Up 0 Down 0

Anonymous on Dec 9, 2009 at 11:41 pm

If the government is going to allow this without the agreement of the community nearest the mine I think the community should be entitled to a form of reimbursement such as a fraction of the income of the mine to go to community development.

The government really needs to stop picking on the little guys... It's been adding up this year and I don't think the outcome is going to be in the gov's favour.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.