Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Premier Ranj Pillai

Ex-inn will host 67 supportive housing units

The Yukon government is investing $12.9 million into The Hearth, a 67-unit permanent supportive housing project.

By Whitehorse Star on March 4, 2024

Revised - The Yukon government is investing $12.9 million into The Hearth, a 67-unit permanent supportive housing project.

Pending renovations will transform the former High Country Inn/Fourth Avenue Residence into safe and affordable housing for a mixed demographic of individuals enduring or at risk of experiencing homelessness.

About $7.9 million of the $12.9 million will go toward the construction and renovation work.

The total construction cost of the project is pegged at about $42 million. That amounts to an estimated $626,000 per unit.

For the past year, the Safe at Home Society has provided temporary housing for 28 residents within the facility as plans were finalized to undertake a major renovation and construction project to create the 67 units by 2026.

Last October, the government provided the society with $699,946 for the winter housing initiative, which will end March 31. Those benefiting from it will have to relocate to alternate premises during the renovations.

“As part of the Downtown Whitehorse Safety Response Action Plan, Health and Social Services is committed to working with partners to help ensure that our most vulnerable citizens have access to essential support and services,” the government said last Thursday.

Once The Hearth opens, the housing units will be allocated to individuals on the By Name List, a real-time list of those currently experiencing homelessness in Whitehorse.

The supportive housing model for the project is driven by a Housing First and harm reduction approach that promotes self- determination and dignity.

“Our government continues to support the tireless work of the Safe at Home Society and its vision to develop the permanent supportive housing project, The Hearth,” said Premier Ranj Pillai, who is also the minister responsible for Yukon Housing Corp.

“I extend my congratulations to all who worked so hard to bring this historic project forward.

“Supporting the Yukon’s most vulnerable residents requires collective action and long-term investments to address the many challenging factors that surround homelessness.”

Construction is planned to begin this month, led by Wildstone Construction Group.

“This achievement marks a monumental step forward in our commitment to ending homelessness by providing a safe, supportive environment for our community,” said Jordan Aslett, a member of the society’s board.

“I witness daily the critical need for supportive housing solutions. The Hearth is a testament to what we can achieve when we come together as a community, dedicated to the well-being and dignity of every individual.

“Our heartfelt thanks go to all our partners who have made this possible,” Aslett added.

Seventy-five per cent of all units are for individuals who identify as Indigenous; 50 per cent overall units for women; and 16 units are reserved for youth between the ages of 18 and 24.

The supportive housing model provides access to crisis intervention and counselling, among other services.

The housing corporation will provide $12.9 million in funding, including $7.9 million for the construction and renovation.

The By Name List is a shared list of individuals experiencing homelessness used to prioritize housing and support based on need.

See related story below; premier’s remarks at Housing Summit, p. 5.

Comments (23)

Up 0 Down 0

Observer on Mar 10, 2024 at 2:31 pm

I read a study once about the cost of homelessness on the public purse. The study took into account the cost for policing, justice systems, healthcare systems, welfare programs, you name it, all the associated costs of homelessness. In the end the report said you could house a homeless person in the best most expensive hotel in NY City for less.

Up 1 Down 1

JC on Mar 8, 2024 at 7:14 am

Amazing how many experts we have on every subject under the sun right here in the Star's comment section. Y'all should run for office and put all this expertise to better use than moaning here.

Up 9 Down 0

YD on Mar 7, 2024 at 8:12 am

YT, I see - thanks for clarifying.

Up 0 Down 1

BHL on Mar 6, 2024 at 6:16 am

Please get over the price tag. We all wish this project was cheaper. As stated in the article there were unanticipated costs. This happens all the time. What’s different here is it’s making the news.

Unfortunate as the new price tag is, we might see Whitehorse actually end homelessness. Wouldn’t that be amazing for all of us?

Up 1 Down 0

Matthew on Mar 6, 2024 at 5:19 am

What the... how.. 600K for a unit thats already built!? What are they using? Solid gold toilets!? You can build a brand new duplex for that price

Up 1 Down 0

Jim on Mar 5, 2024 at 6:24 pm

Where has the sanity gone. We have people (and a premier) applauding this wonderful achievement. We (taxpayers) are paying $700,000 per unit by how I’m reading the total construction cost. This is for a 40+ year old hotel. A private developer just finished a condo project behind the Raven Hotel that sold studio condos for less than 300k. The real neat part is they did it for profit as well. This High Country project is just flushing money away with a NGO in charge of balancing the books. And no, the upkeep on a new build would not be any higher than a crappy old hotel with a face lift. Well actually no face lift yet, and may not get one for a mere $42 million. Even the brand new build by the government on the river front can’t come close to matching the price of this debacle. At least NVD got out of an aged out structure with a cool $10 million. Part of our problem is we have people writing cheques that have no idea what a budget is or what realistic prices and expectations are. Anyone who thinks this is a justifiable value is delusional.

Up 0 Down 0

Confused on Mar 5, 2024 at 3:11 pm

I’m confused, I see 480k per unit tossed around in the comments here I swear I see 626k per unit in the article my 3500 sf country residential replacement cost on my home insurance is 800k?

Up 66 Down 0

YT on Mar 5, 2024 at 2:09 pm

@YD
I didn’t say we should build 67 townhouses, just illustrating the cost comparison. That being said, we would have to build 67 town houses. Say 4 residents/house….. let’s build 17.

Up 91 Down 2

munneeee on Mar 5, 2024 at 12:52 pm

Does this include the 20 Million YG gave them to buy the place?

Up 91 Down 5

Ronnie on Mar 5, 2024 at 12:30 pm

A fitting name for a place where millions of provincial taxpayers' dollars are shoveled into a fire.

Up 99 Down 2

Groucho d'North on Mar 5, 2024 at 9:13 am

Hear that? Its not the wind. Its Barry Bellchambers laughing hysterically from beyond the grave.

Up 101 Down 3

JustSayin' on Mar 5, 2024 at 9:09 am

Why does this amount seem high? I do not understand how people in Government can sit there and think it is reasonable to spend on housing units.

Up 36 Down 28

YD on Mar 5, 2024 at 8:08 am

YT,

I expect that 67 townhouses would be much more difficult and costly to maintain in the long run, not that I'm defending the outrageous "$480,000/unit" price tag.

Up 116 Down 3

KP on Mar 4, 2024 at 10:56 pm

This is taxpayers money.

Where is the accountability?

Up 108 Down 1

Jack on Mar 4, 2024 at 10:28 pm

Follow the money!

Up 116 Down 4

bonanzajoe on Mar 4, 2024 at 5:18 pm

Like always, by the time its completed, the cost will be 5 times this estimate. And it also doesn't take in the cost of annual renovations to the damage that will be done to the suites.

Up 121 Down 2

George on Mar 4, 2024 at 4:37 pm

Didn’t the chilkoot ask for a 2 million loan for 30 units. I guess they dont have the right letters in their name

Up 111 Down 2

Guncache on Mar 4, 2024 at 4:36 pm

$480,000- per unit? You could probably build something new for less than that

Up 109 Down 2

Anie on Mar 4, 2024 at 3:52 pm

67 beds at a cost of about half a million each to construct and Heaven only knows how much to maintain. . The only real hospital in the Yukon has less than 50 beds. That just doesn't seem right to me

Up 2 Down 0

Jake on Mar 4, 2024 at 3:32 pm

What’s wrong with the way it is now? It was my favourite when I visited Whitehorse pretty much up to code. Except for maybe adding a few kitchenettes. 480 thou wow. No wonder we are getting closer look from Ottawa.

Up 192 Down 6

Yukoner on Mar 4, 2024 at 2:35 pm

Tear it down and start again. Unfortunately no one is willing to admit renovating the High Country Inn was a bad idea, so just good money after bad.

Up 191 Down 5

YT on Mar 4, 2024 at 2:08 pm

$480,000.00/unit.
You can buy a townhouse in Whistle Bend for that.
A “boondoggle” is a polite descriptor for this endeavour.

Up 176 Down 4

shane on Mar 4, 2024 at 2:06 pm

White elephant.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.