Photo by Whitehorse Star
TROUBLE IN THE AIR – The city has received complaints from Whistle Bend residents about the smell from the sewage lagoons (above) across the Yukon River from the subdivision.
Photo by Whitehorse Star
TROUBLE IN THE AIR – The city has received complaints from Whistle Bend residents about the smell from the sewage lagoons (above) across the Yukon River from the subdivision.
City officials are working on both short- and long-term solutions to air quality issues in Whistle Bend as complaints about the smell in the neighbourhood continue to waft in.
City officials are working on both short- and long-term solutions to air quality issues in Whistle Bend as complaints about the smell in the neighbourhood continue to waft in.
Brian Crist, the city's director of infrastructure and operations, said this morning the smell that's invaded the city's newest subdivision is "related to the lagoon,” but isn't a new issue facing the city.
In past years, the city has also heard complaints – depending on which way the wind blows – from residents in parts of Porter Creek and now in Whistle Bend, with some residents now living in the area.
The odour is evident over about a two-week period each spring, when the Livingston Trail Lagoon "turns over,” Crist said.
Essentially, the lagoon's bottom rises to the top, creating the smell which remains until oxygen mixes in and the smell dissipates. Crist explained it's a natural process that happens in lakes throughout the North each spring as well.
Crist said the city is using chemicals to help speed up the process as officials research equipment that could potentially be used to deal with the odour in future years.
"The technology's there,” he said, though he also pointed out "it's not cheap.”
Crist didn't have the figures on hand to say what special equipment could cost the city. He did say the city is also considering options that may help bring down the cost, like partnering with the Yukon government so the equipment could also be used in other communities.
"We're working on the price tag,” he said.
The city had awarded a $196,466 contract to AECOM Canada Ltd. for an aeration system. However, as Crist said today, when it became clear last year the system was not effective, the project was cancelled.
"It was a staged thing,” he said, noting the pilot project was planned in three phases so that if it wasn't effective, it could end before more money was spent.
The Yukon government, the developer for Whistle Bend, set aside $2.5 million to deal with the smell before the neighbourhood was developed.
The capital funds budgeted for the work weren't fully spent, Crist pointed out.
He hopes a solution can be found to the air quality issues that plague Whistle Bend and some parts of Porter Creek for about two weeks each year.
He emphasized the city recognizes that Whistle Bend is and will continue to be an important part of the Whitehorse community that the city is committed to serving.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (15)
Up 9 Down 3
Wayne on May 20, 2014 at 8:51 am
Are we sure the smell isn't from city hall, or the YTG building?
Up 5 Down 0
Yukoner 2 on May 20, 2014 at 4:20 am
The sewage lagoon wasn't there in the 80'S
Up 9 Down 1
Arn Anderson on May 19, 2014 at 3:44 am
Should I be surprised about the sewage smell or people complaining? That question answered itself, get off the hype.
Up 27 Down 2
yukoner on May 17, 2014 at 2:03 pm
You can tell outsiders planned this. As a young child growing up in porter creek we played down there all the time in the 80's. As a teenager we would have our little bush parties down there, but when the wind shifted so did we. Nasty. When I first heard they were putting lots out for sale I knew it would be a smelly situation. Bad planning.
Up 6 Down 9
Sandy Helland on May 16, 2014 at 9:50 am
When that cute boat ran river tours years ago, customers floated to and for that odor and it ruined river tourism memories. For other reasons that boat tour ceased. It's not good to smell feces because we taste it, ingest it and river tourism needs to avoid it. Respect our tourists.
Up 24 Down 3
Yukon Justice on May 16, 2014 at 7:37 am
The Yukon will pay for many years to come for letting people from 'outside' design Whistle Bend which should be renamed Mind Bend.
Up 30 Down 1
north of 60 on May 15, 2014 at 5:00 am
The odor problem is 'sustainable',
so we're not supposed to complain.
Up 35 Down 4
Stank on May 15, 2014 at 3:58 am
Bobby.
It's more than the two weeks COW describes. It is all summer long if the wind is coming from the right direction.
Pretty fitting that their flagship development of Whistle Bend is vacant and reeks of feces. Nice job Planning Department......again.
Up 28 Down 2
Wayne Innagin on May 14, 2014 at 11:49 pm
The problem does not occur only "two weeks" each year. It happens during frequent low pressure periods, whenever the north winds blow (which seems to happen more frequently in recent years), and during periods of temperature inversions.
The 2.5 million dollars that was allocated by YG to provide a solution seems to have been eaten up with studies, not solutions, or assets. As I understand it , the city needs electricity run to the lagoon to power permanent aerators. No one seems willing to pay for this. I imagine the City is waiting for YG to cough up funds and YG is waiting for enough public complaints to wake them up. In the mean time , everyone can say they are working on it by studying the problem. This has been studied since 2006.....8 years so far. Its not rocket science. Buy the aerators, run gen sets or run a power line over there. This whole wait until enough people complain idea...stinks to high heaven.
Up 35 Down 7
Josey Wales on May 14, 2014 at 3:30 pm
Really who thought that would ever happen?
I mean besides everyone, who could ever anticipate such a foul out come?
Perhaps to pay homage to Dr Seuss, and re-brand it ...Poo Ville?
That bit of genius is gratis, no consulting fee, no civic back pat required...just a name more fitting for such an EPIC disaster called "civic brainstorming" I think Poo Ville will stick. Pun very much intended.
So I guess it really is true, that BAD decisions unlike haircuts...do not just grow out.
Up thumb for Poo Ville
Down I suppose if ya'll don't dig Josey?
Up 42 Down 3
REALLY?! on May 14, 2014 at 9:32 am
To be clear: the neighbourhood invaded the smell, not the other way around . The lagoons were there long before PooVille was ever even imagined.
And also - haven't we already wasted enough tax dollars on this very issue? Seems to me there have been at least two studies done before now.
The powers that be should have smelled this issue coming long before residents started complaining. OR if they had been paying attention, they could have avoided it entirely by not building where they flush.
Up 50 Down 1
shocker on May 14, 2014 at 9:11 am
Ummm...sorry to state the obvious but when you build a subdivision down wind from a sewage treatment lagoon what do you expect? It's not rocket science.
Up 21 Down 8
Francis Pillman on May 14, 2014 at 8:44 am
Let me be the first to say. Whistle Smell.
Up 63 Down 20
bobby bitman on May 14, 2014 at 8:32 am
Come on people. Using chemicals to deal with an odour of decomposing organic matter that lasts all of two weeks? Get over it or buy a condo somewhere nice and safe from all that nasty outcome of natural processes. And be glad you do not live near farmland when they spread manure for fertilizer, horses or anything else that might offend you!
Chemicals. Head shake.
Up 51 Down 7
June Jackson on May 14, 2014 at 8:30 am
And this.. would be Buckway's legacy. A money pit that smells bad.