Photo by Whitehorse Star
ANNOUNCEMENT MISSES THE POINT – Brad Cathers, the Yukon Party MLA for Lake Laberge, says the main safety issue with the Takhini River Bridge is the need to widen the two-lane highway surface for vehicles.
Photo by Whitehorse Star
ANNOUNCEMENT MISSES THE POINT – Brad Cathers, the Yukon Party MLA for Lake Laberge, says the main safety issue with the Takhini River Bridge is the need to widen the two-lane highway surface for vehicles.
The Yukon Party says it’s concerned about last week’s announcement regarding improvements to the Takhini River Bridge on the Mayo Road.
The Yukon Party says it’s concerned about last week’s announcement regarding improvements to the Takhini River Bridge on the Mayo Road.
Last Wednesday’s news conference about the impending work included Community Services Minister Richard Mostyn, Kwanlin Dün First Nation Chief Sean Smith, MP Brendan Hanley and Mayor Laura Cabott.
The Yukon government will invest more than $2 million to design and build an active transportation route on the bridge. The goal is to make it safer for cyclists, runners and other active transportation users.
Three kilometres of shoulder lanes will be painted on the approaches to the bridge to accommodate users and expand the network of accessible options for travellers. The total funding for the project is $8.5 million.
Construction is expected to begin in 2025.
But the official Opposition says the announcement seems to have missed dealing with the public’s top concern: traffic safety.
“The number-one issue people raise about the Takhini River Bridge is how dangerous this narrow bridge is for vehicle traffic,” Brad Cathers, the Yukon Party MLA for Lake Laberge, said Friday afternoon.
“I have repeatedly raised the public’s concerns about the Takhini River Bridge with this Liberal government since early in their first term, so they are aware people want a wider bridge, and improvements to the approach on the north side,” Cathers said.
“While some would like to see a walkway added for pedestrians, cyclists, and other users, the main issue that needs to be addressed is widening the road surface for vehicles to improve safety.”
There have been several violent collisions on the bridge or on the curving hill leading to its north end over the years, leading to grave injuries in some cases.
Many years ago, a southbound vehicle plunged off the hill over the embankment, prompting the government to install a cement guardrail on the embankment side of the highway.
The YP said in a statement, “Following years of lobbying efforts by the MLA for Lake Laberge on behalf of his constituents for bridge improvements, the Liberal government has announced a project that seems focused on accommodating cyclists and kick-sled users, with no indication of whether it will do anything to address the top public priority of widening the road on the bridge.
“In addition to accidents on the bridge, people frequently report close calls and dangerous situations involving vehicles meeting on this narrow bridge.”
Last June, in reply to one of Cathers’ letters about the bridge, Highways and Public Works Minister Nils Clarke “indicated funding had been set aside for this project,” added Cathers.
“Right after that, I asked him several questions, including if the bridge would be widened to increase the road width for motor vehicles.
“Disappointingly, the minister’s response did not answer that question – or several others. Half a year later, the minister and the Liberal government have yet to provide real answers,” Cathers said.
The Yukon Party is urging the government “to do meaningful public consultation on the Takhini River Bridge project and to modify the design to ensure it reflects the needs and priorities of Yukoners who use this bridge.”
Last Wednesday’s news conference included announcements of active transportation improvements for McIntyre Drive in Whitehorse, and in Watson Lake.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (14)
Up 38 Down 5
At the boarder on Jan 17, 2024 at 6:23 pm
What ever happened to the BIG CREEK BRIDGE PROJECT? Located on the busy Alaska highway,,, "VERY BUSY HIGHWAY" Incomplete Job, can someone please give us answers regarding this bridge contract? Yukoners & Travelers want updates please & Thank U...
Up 10 Down 33
Simon on Jan 17, 2024 at 1:26 pm
Groucho d'North - Recreational cyclists are humans too, just like you (I think). Don't they have rights as well?
That said, the active transportation community - cycling included - never asked or was consulted about this bridge and how it's been labelled as active transportation infrastructure. It's a real shame. This money would have been much better spent elsewhere in Whitehorse where the most vehicle emissions are released.
Up 36 Down 7
Nathan Living on Jan 16, 2024 at 5:43 pm
I favour wider vehicle lanes on the bridge, a reduced speed limit on the approach from the south, on the bridge and on the hill on the north side.
If vehicle traffic slowed down a little the safety concerns for vehicles will be exponentially reduced.
I also support safe pedestrian and cyclist passage over the bridge. Think of the improvements to the bridge between downtown and Riverdale; they work!
Up 43 Down 10
Wilf on Jan 16, 2024 at 5:31 pm
How long has Brad had this bridge in his riding?
Up 73 Down 0
yukongirl on Jan 16, 2024 at 1:11 pm
Widen the bridge please! I live north of Whitehorse and every time that I drive into town and go down the curvy hill, I vividly remember someone driving a large RV straight at me while he was in the middle of the bridge. I remember thinking what would hurt less - driving onto the side which had no barricades at the time or hitting the RV. The driver jerked to the side thankfully but I cannot drive down that hill without the flashback.
Up 44 Down 7
Dallas on Jan 16, 2024 at 11:36 am
What does the city and Sean Smith have to do with the bridge?
Up 20 Down 57
Ronnie on Jan 16, 2024 at 10:38 am
The bridge is awesome as is. It looks to be in great shape and has a nice colour. Any time lanes narrow anywhere, for any reason, drivers and cyclists should slow down. Really basic stuff in the rest of the developed world.
Up 83 Down 5
Bruce Bark on Jan 16, 2024 at 10:15 am
Remember back in 2009, when the very narrow and dangerous McClintock River bridge was widened out. That improvement included deck replacement, girder replacement, extended piers, new guard rails, and a paintjob. Since that time I can't recall and major accidents at that crossing, they were quite common before the upgrade. Why is our current government only concerned with the active transportation people, and not ALL of the travelling public. I long for the days a mere 15 years ago when politicians did what was right for all their constituents not just the ones they admire.
Up 83 Down 10
Groucho d'North on Jan 16, 2024 at 9:35 am
It appears that all planning within the Liberal government is determined by how much they can advance the non-carbon future they are punishing Canadians to adopt. It is well documented that the Takhini River bridge is a danger and needs remediation. This isn’t a crosswalk; it is an integral part of the north Yukon’s economy on which commercial traffic hauls the required goods to the voters in the communities and the resources from the upper part of the territory can be shipped to the southern markets. One medium level collision on the bridge will shut that all down and probably for a substantial amount of time to effect repairs. Liberal MLAs representing the northern Yukon communities should be speaking up about this misguided decision where recreational cyclists, and not many of them, are more important than ensuring a reliable and trustworthy transportation network.
Up 83 Down 11
Gonzo on Jan 15, 2024 at 9:36 pm
I am not sure what the liberals are thinking, 8.5 million under the premise that “pedestrians “ and “bikers” can now use the bridge. I’ve driven that bridge 10k times never did see ONE pedestrian. The bridge and its approach needs to be completely overhauled, it’s a very dangerous part of the North Klondike, I would venture the most dangerous. Brad has been doing his due diligence and the Libs best pay attention save the 8.5 spend 12 and get something so that drivers can be safe.
Up 54 Down 34
TK on Jan 15, 2024 at 4:06 pm
Mr Cathers is being disingenuous. He had many years in government where he could have addressed this long standing issue
Someone should fix this
Up 84 Down 4
Terry Ruttan on Jan 15, 2024 at 3:34 pm
It seems bikes are of utmost importance for this govt and city
Just look at the chilkoot way useless bike lanes on which that i have seen a maximum of 5 bike since they were installed. Great use of taxpayer money.Now lets use some more on this bridge without consideration to the danger to vehicles.
Up 92 Down 0
drum on Jan 15, 2024 at 2:51 pm
Driving that bridge everyday I want it widened. I have had an accident on that bridge. Please!!!!!!!!
Up 108 Down 1
ShallowBay on Jan 15, 2024 at 2:39 pm
The last thing the Takhini river bridge needs is a bike lane.
It needs a widening before there's a really bad accident on it.
Widening it would make it safer for everybody.