Yukono

News archive for October 26, 2009

Poll testing waters for Phelps’ return

Results from a DataPath Systems poll to be released later this week could set the stage for former Yukon government leader Willard Phelps to take another run at territorial politics.

By Jason Unrau on October 26, 2009 at 3:19 pm

Results from a DataPath Systems poll to be released later this week could set the stage for former Yukon government leader Willard Phelps to take another run at territorial politics.

Last June, Phelps made news when he and three directors of the Yukon Energy Corp. resigned in protest over Premier Dennis Fentie’s designs to privatize the public utility.

While Fentie denied allegations he orchestrated secret negotiations to merge energy corporation assets with Calgary-based ATCO’s subsidiary Yukon Electrical Co. Ltd., Phelps released a government-produced “joint position paper” that suggested otherwise.

Confirmation of the back room deal-making would surface in late August, following the high-profile resignation by cabinet minister Brad Cathers. He said Fentie lied to his cabinet and the public about first attempting to sell, then engaging in privatization talks with ATCO.

According to DataPath pollster Donna Larsen, in addition to questioning Yukoners about their political preferences – part of the Yukon research company’s own quarterly poll – the survey also includes questions about Phelps.

“Is there an awareness of who (Phelps) is? Do those who know him agree with his actions if they were aware of them? And, if he were running as an independent ... how he rated against the other leaders,” Larsen told the Star of the nature of the questions.

As word of the poll fuels speculation on Phelps’ return to politics, on Friday, the former Progressive Conservative and Yukon Party MLA, government leader and cabinet minister was saying little.

“I’ll be speaking to that in full once we know the results,” Phelps said last week of the survey. “No, I didn’t (initiate the poll); some of my friends did.”

As Phelps remains tightlipped, another member of the old political guard, former Liberal MLA and cabinet minister Don Roberts, offered some behind-the-scenes insight, and appears to be aligning himself with Phelps.

On Friday afternoon, Roberts told the Star that Phelps is not only considering a political return, but one with the goal of getting rid of party politics in the territory altogether.

“I’m not in the group that’s doing the DataPath thing, but I’ve been made privy to what’s happening,” he said.

With little more than 30,000 people in the territory, the government need not be run like a provincial legislature but in a manner akin to a city council, said Roberts.

“I believe a city council model is one that looks after the needs of the community. It opens dialogue to the whole of the community ... you cannot hide in the corner office,” said Roberts.

He cited Cathers’ resignation and independent MLA John Edzerza running back to the Yukon Party fold as a grim reminder of how territorial politics have been poisoned by partisanship.

“If I hadn’t tried party politics, I would probably say there’s no other way. But I have and there is.”

In 2002, then-premier Pat Duncan tossed Roberts and two other Liberal MLAs from the ruling party’s caucus for what Roberts described as “challenging” Duncan’s authoritarian rule.

Seven years later, not only would Roberts consider running with Phelps under a platform of non-partisan political reform, but he believes Phelps, who ironically helped introduce party politics to the Yukon in the late 1970s, is the right man to show it the door.

“To me, it’s Willard. You can’t just do it with somebody off the street. You need somebody who’s been there and knows the system,” Roberts said. “And no doubt, the parties will pooh, pooh it.”

When Cathers resigned from the Yukon Party caucus, reducing it to minority government status, he remained hopeful other members would follow. Instead, they closed ranks around the premier, and Edzerza’s decision last week to sit as a Yukon Party backbencher returned Fentie’s regime to a majority government.

Cathers said this afternoon he turned down Phelps’ overtures to join a new political movement.

“I did have a conversation with Willard and he floated his idea to me and I made it clear that I respect the intent behind that, but I remain committed to the Yukon Party,” Cathers said, hinting Fentie could be ousted at the party’s annual spring leadership review.

“There are very strong divisions in the party and long-term members feel there needs to be a change in leadership.”

Like Roberts predicted, Cathers is skeptical about any attempts to overhaul current party politics via an independent slate of MLA-hopefulls.

“I don’t think any party that starts out with the intention of being non-partisan or independent can avoid becoming another ordinary party,” predicted Cathers.

“Those who are advocating it believe that it would be a new type of politics, but I think that would last a few months and it would eventually turn into just another partisan stripe.”

CommentsAdd a comment

Aubin Mitchell

Oct 26, 2009 at 4:25 pm

Lets get some fresh faces in politics… not the same old people who run again and again. I didnt vote for willard in the first place, nor would i do it again.  His time is up

Stella

Oct 26, 2009 at 5:06 pm

Wow with Jason Unrau as his own personal reporterat least Phelps has all the free good press he could want.  I love how you don’t even pretend to be non-partison Jason.

M. Thompson

Oct 26, 2009 at 6:49 pm

Non-partisan politics is practiced in the Northwest Territories very successfully.  In the NWT, MLAs are elected across the territory, and then all of the MLA’s elect a premier from the group of successful MLA’s.  The MLA’s also vote on cabinet ministers.  Two cabinet ministers must be from the southern part of the territory and two of them must be from the northern part of the territory in an attempt to represent the voices of all communities.  The MLA’s who are not in cabinet are responsible for critiquing policies similar to the opposition.  Policies and legislation are therefore always being decided by consensus, not how many party members there are in power at any given time.

Northern Lights

Oct 26, 2009 at 8:41 pm

Thought it was Michael Phelps…DOH!

Wayne Campbell

Oct 27, 2009 at 3:10 pm

Re-electing Phelps is just starting again with a different old boy’s club.  He wasn’t any good before, and he won’t do any better now.  Don’t these rich old lawyers have anything better to do than bother the citizens?  Having said that, I go along with whatever Francias has to say.  About anything.

namewitheld

Oct 28, 2009 at 12:32 am

Why such/any negative responses here to Mr. Phelps?

Why are your memories so short?

He’s a whistleblower, and whistleblowers don’t curry any favour in old boys clubs.

If he succeeds at promoting consensus government (CG), the result will make maintaining party discipline EXTINCT.  There may be old loyalties, but the dynamics of consensus government will destroy territorial parties, and the PERSON will then becomes the BRAND.

I would encourage far less negativity for those naysayers on this string.  Mr. Phelps has gotten the ball rolling by blowing the whistle on fentie’s corrupt character, which is it the heart of our problems, and THAT is what matters.  The fact Mr. Phelps did so should earn him the utmost respect in all matters, especially where consensus government (CG) as a way forward goes.  The courage it takes to blow the whistle on such dangerous and high Machiavellians as are fentie and his cabal, speaks to great inner strength…...take a small bow too Brad Cathers…..and then leave the yukon party once and for all.

fentie has proven he is capable of anything to maintain power (see “edzerdza rises from the bottom and swallows the bait with ease”).  Such dark transactions, smashed directly and publicly into the face of voters, show the true threat to our combined interests where fentie’s gang and the yukon party are concerned. 

On the topic of CG, try to imagine a city of 35,000 people running on party politics.  It just doesn’t happen.  Yukon doesn’t have the population base to make such a system work.  Party politics in our setting is by default, rule by the VERY FEW.  CG gets far more people into the tent on EVERY decision.

Donald E. Taylor

Oct 28, 2009 at 5:33 am

It is my considered opinion that party politics under normal circumstances can work just fine here in Yukon. What I believe has upset the process is the quiet highjacking of the Yukon Party, and indeed the government, by a few idividuals under the influence and control of the current Minister of Community Services. I can only hope people will examine this question, and soon!

Max

Oct 28, 2009 at 3:19 pm

I think Phelps is spot on. The party system is broken in the Yukon, and it hasn’t been working for years.

It is time for change.

Jack Malone

Oct 28, 2009 at 6:31 pm

Hey, M. Thompson and others who long for the NWT non-partisan system of government.  Have you noticed that it is a gong show in the NWT - lots of personal agendas but little (if any) common vision to achieve anything!  What significant legislation has been passed by the NWT Legislature over the past decade?  No devolution.  Just a growing government since division.  Yes - the grass always seems greener on the other side.  But if you had any experience with the NWT system of government, you would realize that stalemate is not anything for Yukoners to aspire to.

jeff reid

Oct 28, 2009 at 6:42 pm

With the streak yukon voters are on lately, dennis fentie will remain premier of the yukon. Get out there and vote people, make your voice heard, if you dont vote, keep your yip shut

name with held

Oct 30, 2009 at 6:38 pm

Donald E. Taylor seems to be onto something and the press should get on it too.

The minister he refers to, archie lang, benefitted hugely from a deal that fentie was instrumental in, namely the sale of hotels in watson lake, from lang and irvin, to the first nations, for housing.

The hotels are boarded up.  What went wrong?  Follow the money.

Somebody better look into this and what better group to lead than the press…..because the opposition is asleep.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview