Yukon North Of Ordinary

News archive for November 23, 2009

‘None of this is Trevor’s fault’

Trevor the dog is back in city custody, after being spotted on the street without his muzzle.

By Justine Davidson on November 23, 2009 at 3:52 pm

photo

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Trevor

Trevor the dog is back in city custody, after being spotted on the street without his muzzle.

On Friday afternoon, Dave Pruden, the city’s senior bylaw officer, saw the 1-1/2-year-old German shepherd-Rottweiler cross tied to a tree outside a business on Quartz Road in Whitehorse’s industrial area. The dog was not wearing a muzzle, as ordered by a Yukon Supreme Court justice.

Trevor is a resident of the Humane Society Yukon’s Mae Bachur Shelter.

He was first brought to the shelter with a chain grown into his neck after being rescued from a neglectful owner by a bylaw officer. There, he was patched up and put up for adoption.

But the next person to take Trevor home soon returned him to the city pound with reports that he had bitten and lunged at a number of people.

The dog was deemed dangerous and scheduled to be put down.

His execution was halted by Whitehorse resident Kevin Sinclair, who brought Trevor’s case to supreme court on the basis that Trevor is the humane society’s property and the city had no legal right to kill him. Soon after, the human society took over the case.

Ultimately, the dog has been allowed to live, but he does so under very strict court conditions, which the volunteers who walk him and help with his training all know about.

According to bylaw manager John Taylor, the volunteer who was walking Trevor told Pruden he had the muzzle, but couldn’t get it on.

Pruden muzzled the dog and told the walker to take Trevor back to the shelter.

It was later learned that someone had stopped to admire the dog, and the walker had removed the muzzle “to show Trevor off,” humane society spokeswoman Rachel Westfall explained today, and was then unable to get the mask back on.

Later Friday, Pruden and Taylor arrived at the shelter and seized the dog.

“Considering that Trevor has been deemed a danger to the public and in light of all the restrictions that are supposed to be followed in the animal’s care, we had no choice but to act,” Taylor said today.

“Everyone (at the shelter) is understandably really upset,” Westfall said today. “... It was a poor judgment call by his handler, and he clearly hadn’t thought it would impact negatively on Trevor, but it did.

“The worst part is, none of this is Trevor’s fault; he’s like a ping-pong ball in all this.”

The volunteer who was out with Trevor on Friday won’t be allowed to walk him again, she added.

Westfall said the city didn’t need to take such drastic action and that taking Trevor away from his home at the shelter disturbed his normal training routine and may have set back his rehabilitation.

She also said the city had no legal right under any municipal bylaws to take the dog and that the judge who has overseen Trevor’s case made no provisions for seizing the dog.

Taylor said today the city has no desire to keep the dog, nor have him put down, but could not just stand by and watch a judge’s decision being ignored.

“An order is an order, and you can’t breach the order,” Taylor said. “We can’t brush these things under the table and say they didn’t happen.”

The two sides are scheduled to meet in court again this afternoon, at which time Taylor said he expects the dog will be returned to the shelter with even more stringent conditions.

The shelter is currently looking for a new home for the dog.

Although Trevor has become the cause célèbre of animal lovers in Whitehorse and beyond, finding him an appropriate home has become a complicated matter since the matter was taken to court.

Negotiations between the city and the shelter have resulted in an extensive training and care plan for the dog.

Trevor can’t live with children or other dogs. He must be kept in a yard which does not abut a trail or sidewalk.

He must be kept muzzled and on a leash whenever he is outside his own yard and for the first month of life in his new home, he cannot be allowed to see out the doors or windows when he is inside.

Stipulations added by the city are that whoever adopts Trevor must have insurance in case he bites someone, and he or she must live within city limits.

To date, the Trevor the dog case has cost Whitehorse more that $25,000 in legal fees, a city spokesman said today.

CommentsAdd a comment

Thomas Brewer

Nov 23, 2009 at 4:22 pm

Sigh… shoot the dog, save our tax dollars to fund the Canada Games Centre instead.

This never should have gone this far.

Anthony

Nov 23, 2009 at 4:29 pm

How many of us Yukoners have walked into or out of a business and seen a dog tied to a bike rack or tree?  How many of us tentatively crouched and offer a pat in a soft voice?  This is an event that could have ended horribly had an unsuspecting person done what many of us would routinely do.  The dog was no doubt stressed about being out for a walk, further stressed about being left tied up sans muzzle and handler and very likely would have bitten anyone attempting to socialize with it.

Sinclair and gang cry ‘it’s not the dog’s fault’ and they are right, it isn’t Trevor’s fault.  Trevor had ZERO accountability for his actions; he’s a dog.  So who does accountability lie with?  The courts?  Animal control?  Sinclair? (who ironically hasn’t adopted Trevor)

No one denies the dog got the short stick in life, and we can all feel empathy, but at what cost?  Trevor mauls an innocent child?  I’m not interested in waiting around to find out.  The time, money and energy spent on this one lost cause has had a negative ripple effect on the other dogs that could be rehabbed and fostered.

Sorry Trevor, you number is up.

Alvena Workman

Nov 23, 2009 at 4:55 pm

Do people not have any common sense?!  Why would the handler (who knew better) leave the dog tied up without a muzzle?  This person should not be allowed to work at the shelter let alone walk any dog when he/she is this irresponsible.  It is a huge responsibility to walk any dog without due care and attention.  I really feel sorry for this poor dog who was treated so brutally by it’s first owner and has not had a minutes peace since the idiot who adopted him let him hurt people.  It is not the dog’s fault it is the human who is supposed to be the intelligent one and caring for the dog.
I have no tolerance for people who treat animals so carelessly.

happy camper

Nov 23, 2009 at 6:08 pm

Oh my lord…what kinda of people do we put in charge here.  Listen I am all for the Humane Society and its values but lets all get real folks.  This dog has had more attention than the Premier and against the wishes of the vast public has been allowed to live a ridiculous life of kennel confinement. Now we allow a “HANDLER” to remove its muzzle and tie it to a tree during its court restricted walks only to have this poor animal back to the City Pound wondering what is next.  Sorry but the folks from the Humane Society dropped the ball and have demonstrated they can not be responsible for this animal.  Handlers are not volunteers, muzzles on dangerous dogs are not negotiable, and tying dogs to trees is ridiculous.  Enough Enough Enough..its a shame we can’t save the dog and some of the people in charge of this in a muzzle and a cage.

Sarah

Nov 23, 2009 at 6:38 pm

Well, here we go everyone looks like The dog formerly known as Trevor, belongs to the city for good now, good job Kevin Sinclair for wasting people’s time on this case, I could of told ya that he would be back in no time.  Not only was all these pointless court time a waste of money but a waste of newspaper space.

I agree that it isn’t the dogs fault, but obviously if the provision for such a dog are so strict that he can’t even look out the window he was bound to go crazy again.


RIP Trevor

tommy smith

Nov 23, 2009 at 7:05 pm

all this fuss and money spent on a dog.  25 thousand dollars be much better spent on homeless people feeding them. but i guess only in yukon dogs life is more important.

JC

Nov 23, 2009 at 7:25 pm

Send Trevor to doggy heaven, or doggy hell. What ever.

TL

Nov 23, 2009 at 7:33 pm

This wasnt a drastic action by the city, it was the same action they would have taken with any other dog deemed dangerous under the Animal Control by-law….I should know, I own one of those dogs.  My dog is also a shelter dog who had a horrible start to his life.  The rules that my dog and I live by are exactly the same as the ones improsed by the City on Trevor.  He is not allowed off my property without a short leash and muzzle.  If I fail to abide by the conditions of his court order(all dangerous deemings are a court order), my dog can be apprehended by the city and euthanized.  End of story.  It’s my responsiblity to ensure that doesn’t happen.  It’s a bit of a hassle, requires some extra work to make sure he’s a happy, healthy dog, but it’s not that difficult!

Wayne Campbell

Nov 23, 2009 at 8:00 pm

Throw the human who handled Trevor so poorly into the pound for a week, drag him through court, have him seen by a behaviourist, return him to the shelter for six months, and then shoot him.

francias pillman

Nov 24, 2009 at 12:57 am

Anyone who replys after me on this long drawn oiut saga should be fined and put on a chain gang, with 8 months hard labour. Who cares about this friggin dog? I also blame the STAR for reporting every time this dog takes a dump or looks at someone the wrong way, GIVE IT UP.

mosi

Nov 24, 2009 at 6:48 am

Get Over it! Have WE all not heard (AND Paid?) ENOUGH about that maggott infested flea-trap mutt? Get over it. A bullet in the head would save us all.

Happy Paws

Nov 24, 2009 at 9:38 am

From what I understand bylaw watches like a hawk whenever someone is walking Trevor just waiting for something to screw up - don’t they have other things to do, other things they are paid to do?

I still feel there are 2 things that have been sadly overlooked in this whole situation:  what about the person who initially allowed the collar to grow into Trevor’s neck?  What about the Allaby’s who breached their contract with the Shelter, to return Trevor if they didn’t want him?

The only one who seems to be getting punished out of all this is Trevor the Dog.  These people should be held accountable for their actions!

Kailey Irwin

Nov 24, 2009 at 1:43 pm

Oh come on! The handler who breached conditions should be fined and Trevor should be returned to the shelter to continue his rehabilitation. Fine the handler the cost of the court case and reimburse our tax dollars! Problem solved. Tax money would be back and the dog would still get his chance to continue living a better life than what he was given in the first place.

Joe Dust

Nov 24, 2009 at 4:38 pm

Court Order
- Do not take Muzzle off dog

Pretty fricken simple people , If the dog ends up biting another person, thats the end of the line.

I apprecaite what the Humane Society is trying to do, Give dogs a good home and find good owners, but you cant save them all and leaving an aggresive dog tied up to a tree where any little kid could run up to him and want to pet the pooch could get seriously injured or killed, is just like walking down mainstreet throwing shotgun shells on the ground.

I love dogs, And i love what your trying to do, but this dog is not worth the hassle, he is dangerous. And the HS will probebly have that dog for a long time, I know I woudnt want to take him , to much of a liablity.

Give him back to the “evil” city bullies… They had the right idea from the start.

Joe Dust

Nov 24, 2009 at 4:43 pm

Happy paws, Do you really think bylaw has time to watch that dog every time he goes for a walk…

For one, its their job to watch the animals, for two, You shoudnt be breaking the rules anyway. Shut your trap before you get bit.

Its pretty dam simple.
Court Order- Listen to it

Sarah

Nov 24, 2009 at 4:44 pm

Kailey Give it up girl, the dog is as good as dead!

Dog Lover

Nov 25, 2009 at 11:50 am

Happy Paws…Actually…I’m quite sure Bylaw has much more important things to do than stand around all day and hope to catch a glimpse of that stupid dog. However they can’t just drive by and see the unmuzzled dog and not do anything about it. It’s interesting how it’s the handlers fault, yet blame it on bylaw because they had to take the dog…and Rachel Westfall…stop being such a drama queen…It’s your side that screwed up, perhaps take a little bit of responsibility. The fact that people were calling bylaw officers at home…even that is pretty low. Very low actually. As for Rachels comments that the officers had no right to do that…well…according to the judge, they had every right to do it, using something called common sense and the fact the judge said if it happened again he’d hope they would take Trevor again. The concern for a dog only goes so far when it comes down to public safety. If it’s between a dog and a child…guess who I’m picking first. I just hope that stemming from this incident Rachel and the rest of the dog handlers will use common sense from this point on. Only time will tell though…

rascal

Nov 25, 2009 at 6:31 pm

may be the mae bachur animal shelter should be more on top of the instructions they give to there volunteers.just another stupid human trick to really meke a dog feel good.

jaime smith

Nov 25, 2009 at 6:32 pm

So Trevor has made the national news in the Globe & Mail once again today! This whole kerfuffle about a famous biter dog now serves to intrigue the entire country, incidentally providing publicity for the Territory of a peculiar sort. Stay tuned, maybe even CBC will do a special. 

Poor Trevor, he didn’t want to be a cause celebre, he’s only a dog that was mistreated. If anyone’s at fault it’s the cruel owner that mistreated him, not to mention the incompetant volunteer that caused this current mess.

Another Dog Lover...

Nov 25, 2009 at 7:52 pm

....Just curious…. why didn’t the bylaw officers take the dog WHILE he was tied to a tree…??
Why did they have to show up @ the shelter to take him?  Does anyone have 100% proof the dog they witnessed was Trevor??

Just a thought…

Bookish

Nov 26, 2009 at 1:09 am

I believe in most of the work that the humane society does and have even volunteered there.

The people who have tied up the legal system with this case have done Trevor a grave injustice.

This poor dog was facing a needle in the paw and then a gentle peaceful slide into death.  Instead he is was forced to live in conditions that no animal should ever have to endure at the humane society, talk about animal cruelty.

So how about letting Trevor stay at the City animal shelter (yes it is called that not the Pound) and find his peaceful end.

Hopefully the people involved in this drawn out drama will learn a lesson (not all dogs can or should be saved).

Kailey Irwin

Nov 26, 2009 at 8:13 am

Sarah,

No need for me to give it up, Trevor is back at the shelter as of yesterday. If you don’t care about Trevor and the rest of you negative people are so sick of hearing about it then why are you all still writing about it?

Happy Paws

Nov 26, 2009 at 10:57 am

Joe Dust

I have spent lots of time with this dog long before all this legal business started and had not one problem.  I trust him alot more than I do someone with your attitudes - do you work for bylaw or the city? Sounds like I hit a sore spot!

I have the right to speak my mind and KNOW that I won’t get bit - maybe you should shut your own trap!

Dirty paws

Nov 27, 2009 at 3:37 pm

You know, the city has an animal shelter, yet humans have to sleep on the sidewalk. People follow bob barkers advice, get your pets nudered and spayed, the pet population is becoming out of control in the territory.

Oh yeah, im with the others that want this dog put down, what a waste of money this thing has become,  if only we had a competent mayor and council who put there foot down once in a while

Me myself and YXY

Nov 27, 2009 at 5:40 pm

So OVER this story

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview