Yukon North Of Ordinary

News archive for February 17, 2010

New regulations laid out for taxis, limousines

Cab and limousine companies in the city could soon find themselves the subject of new regulations if the city goes ahead with new vehicle-for-hire bylaws governing each industry.

By Stephanie Waddell on February 17, 2010 at 4:16 pm

Cab and limousine companies in the city could soon find themselves the subject of new regulations if the city goes ahead with new vehicle-for-hire bylaws governing each industry.

Both are covered under the current vehicle-for-hire bylaw.

At Monday night’s city council meeting, however, bylaw manager John Taylor brought forward two new bylaws – a separate one each for limos and cabs – and recommended council instruct staff to put it out for public consultation.

“The taxi industry, through input provided to the city, indicates that the current bylaw needs to be reviewed,” notes the administrative report brought forward to council.

The cut-off for residents to get their opinions into the city would be March 15, Taylor said after going over the proposed new regulations.

That would give city staff time to come up with any changes needed before taking it to council.

One of the biggest changes to the regulations would be that drivers would not be allowed to have a cell phone while they’re in the car or limo.

“We have added a new section dealing with cell phones after receiving a number of concerns from passengers that were riding in vehicles for hire and witnessing the driver trying to drive and answer the cell phone,” it was noted in the report.

“We now have a provision in the proposed bylaws which states that you cannot possess a cell phone while driving a vehicle-for-hire. This will eliminate any issues about using a cell phone if they are stopped and found to be in possession.”

Coun. Dave Stockdale suggested the move might be viewed as extreme. Taylor noted it would be impossible to monitor otherwise.

The bylaw manager also said every driver would have a radio in their vehicle to keep in touch with dispatch, as a radio and base station would be required under the bylaw.

Territorial MLAs are studying the possibility of Yukon-wide legislation banning drivers of private vehicles from using cell phones behind the wheel as well.

Other proposed changes to the vehicle-for-hire laws would see:

• New provisions issued to drivers getting a temporary vehicle-for-hire permit while they wait for their criminal record fingerprint check (which can take months). It requires the driver to be at least 18, read and write in English and have a working knowledge of the city and surrounding area.

“These provisions are put in place after receiving a number of inquiries and complaints from the tourism industry that visitors coming into Whitehorse when asking for information were not forthcoming,” the document reads.

“We realize that the persons driving these vehicles are ambassadors, and sometimes they are the first individuals that our visitors are meeting, and we want to make sure we make a good impression.”

• A letter required indicating which company the driver would be working for;

• Drivers’ abstracts that are required not be more than 30 days old;

• Proof required of valid and current liability insurance of $3 million for cabs and $5 million for limos;

• Proof required of a business phone number to assist and confirm the location of the company and where records are kept.

“Throughout the bylaw there are provisions where the designated officer needs to know where the records are kept in the event we are required to obtain a search warrant to seize these records,” notes the report;

• A limit of 50 vehicle-for-hire permits issued by the city, with cab and limo companies permitted a maximum of 10 licences. The request came from industry, Taylor explained;

• New mechanical standards in place that would include out-of-service orders issued and fines levied for any vehicle for hire found to be not mechanically fit; limiting to five years a cab can be on the road unless it is deemed in exceptional condition.

“A major factor would be the opinion and completion of the mechanical fitness report,” the report reads.

“It is felt that buses, charter vehicles and limousines do not warrant the same treatment as taxicabs, but will be closely monitored doing the annual mechanical fitness examination to determine if they should be allowed on the road or not”; and

• Fares would be increased on Feb. 1 of each year based on the increase in the Consumer Price Index over the previous year.

City council will vote next week on whether to put the proposal out for a formal consultation period.

CommentsAdd a comment

Kailey Irwin

Feb 18, 2010 at 2:35 pm

I think that not allowing taxis and limos to have a cell phone is a bit extreme, what about blue-tooth handsfree sets?

klondike-man

Feb 18, 2010 at 4:38 pm

I think the idea of distraction free vehicles…well…cell phones anyways is a great idea. Other Provinces have already banned drivers from using cell phones and since YTG is possibly looking at the idea Territory wide anyways…I think it is a great idea. Look at the prime example a few weeks ago of the driver on their phone that struck the child…thank goodness nothing happened…but to play Devils advocate…what would happen if that child did lose their life because someone was on the phone? The fact that taxi’s will now need a dispatch will eliminate the need for a phone anyways and it’s about time taxi companies become monitored and regulated just like the cab companies down south. I encourage and applaud the City for taking a step in the right direction. I’m not sure why that one counsellor may be opposed to the idea of updating the taxi bylaw and I would like to know why…these are nothing but positive changes and I thought she was on council to provide positive changes for the City. Anyways…I see nothing bad about these proposed changes at all except for some cabbies stomping their feet in protest to better regulations to monitor the cab companies in this town! It’s about time!!

Norman Marchewa

Feb 18, 2010 at 5:56 pm

I think the cell phones idea is a good one. No one can drive and handle a cell phone. How about the drivers that are packing their children around in the cabs while they work.  I find this more of an issue.  I noticed it with Preimer Cabs the most.  Seems everytime in the last 2 years I got picked up via cab the women had her child in the car.  To me this is not appropriate on any level

darren

Feb 18, 2010 at 9:34 pm

i think before limos and taxis are except from the cell rule, it should be passed on to regular folk who drive our city streets.

good ideas city… but the rest of the driving population should also face that

Kailey Irwin

Feb 19, 2010 at 2:50 pm

I think that the no cell phones thing for everyone would be the better idea, we should follow BC’s example.

I mean seriously, it takes 30 minutes tops to get anywhere in this town. If you really really need to take the call, pull over.

francias pillman

Feb 19, 2010 at 3:37 pm

I guess my comments are being blacked as well, figures. Yesterday I said that hands-free devices use the same part of the brain and are as equally dangerous. BAN THEM ALL.

Girl Uninterrupted

Feb 19, 2010 at 9:42 pm

Hah. Banning cell phones! Excellent idea! How about doing something similar to Toronto and regulating the cleanliness of the cabs too!!

*coughYellowcabscough*

Doug Rutherford

Feb 22, 2010 at 6:49 pm

I agree with the limiting of cell phones for cab drivers.

First, under the present bylaw, they are not to be using cellphones for communication with the dispatcher. The bylaw specifically states that a taxi must be equipped with “two-way radio communication with a base station and dispatcher.” Note that this also predicates that dispatch must be done from somewhere other than in the cab.

Secondly, a commercial driver carrying passengers has the onus to ensure the safety of those passengers. Perfoming tasks that every study has indicated to increase the possibility of an accident is unacceptable.

Lastly, what employer wants his or her employees to be making personal calls while transporting passengers. I’m assuming they are personal since they are supposed to use radio, rather than cellphone for business communications.

Occasional taxi user

Feb 22, 2010 at 9:02 pm

I sometimes use the taxi services in town…if we’re planning a night out..  I agree with the banning of cell phones… and I also agree that it shouldn’t stop @ the taxi drivers…

I think the Yukon should follow the lead of BC.. Ban the use of cell phones all together while driving.. no BS bluetooth/handsfree… ban them all. 
If you’re so concerned with answering your phone.. stay home.. or pull over..
Perfect example of why: a couple of weeks ago.. a lady hit a toddler in the parking lot of the Quanlin mall..  why did this happen??  because the kid was running all over the place?? NO!  Because this woman was too concerned with talking on her cell phone to pay attention to driving… IN A PARKING LOT TO BOOT!!!!!!!!!!!

For once, I agree with Francias!!! BAN THEM ALL!!!!!!!!

PS:  Cleanliness of cabs to… to echo Girl Uninterrupted:  *cough cough*  YELLOW CABS!!!  *cough cough*
..and while we’re on the topic of Yellow.. is that RUDE WOMAN still dispatching??????  LEARN SOME MANNERS!!!!!!!

Cory Kreutzer

Feb 23, 2010 at 4:17 am

I run a small cab company here in Petawawa Ontario, the cell phone ban came in effect here, Febuary. Blue tooth devices are allowed. Do I believe the cell phone was a distraction, you bet. We can point to at least four incidents that could have been avoided if a cell phone had not been in use. But there are just as many situations that have come up while driving that involved a cup a coffee, or a radio dial. Cocentrate on the task at hand ( driving) and everyone on the road is safer. Just an opinion.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview