Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Krista Mroz

‘We have a difficult pool to guard’

The chances to go jump in a pool could be fewer for Whitehorse if council doesn’t approve a $20,000 increase to the lifeguarding budget at the Whitehorse Lions Aquatic Centre.

By Stephanie Waddell on August 25, 2015

The chances to go jump in a pool could be fewer for Whitehorse if council doesn’t approve a $20,000 increase to the lifeguarding budget at the Whitehorse Lions Aquatic Centre.

Krista Mroz, the city’s manager of recreation and facility services, brought forward the recommendation for the increase to council Monday evening.

A request had been made when the city adopted its 2015 spending plan that would allow the city to meet new national standards for life-guarding. It was turned down.

A total of $760,000 was identified in the budget to accommodate the 30 to 35 lifeguards required at the pool who work full-time, part-time and casual positions covering 110 hours of operation per week at the pool. That includes guarding, teaching lessons and any training required.

Staff have since worked to meet the standards by making efficiencies elsewhere (including cutting down on aquatic classes like Aquafit).

The shortfall now stands to cut into the pool’s operating schedule and/or more programming in order to meet the standards.

“The city has always operated in accordance with national standards since there is no other governing legislation, regarding lifeguarding and instructor ratios,” Mroz noted in her report to council.

“Not doing so would put the city at risk for any accidents or injuries. The budget request identified that service level adjustments would need to be made if the request was not approved.”

As part of the second quarter review, it was found the city would need to spend another $20,000 if the current pool schedule were to remain in place while still meeting national life-guarding standards.

As Mroz explained: “In order to maintain the same public swimming access for fall 2015 as the previous year, an additional 50 hours/week for instructor/lifeguards are required.

“There are 10 hours/week required for early-morning swimming between 5:30 (and) 7:30 a.m. on weekdays and 40 hours/week are required for guarding lane swimming, sauna, steam room and swirl pool during joint use times Tuesday to Friday.

“This equates to $25,500, which can be reduced to $20,000 through operational adjustments during pool shutdown and Christmas break.”

Without the increase, the leisure pool would be closed from 5:30 a.m. to 7:30 a.m. on weekdays, when an average of 18 people use the pool at that time of day.

Meanwhile, lane swimming and sauna, steam room and swirl pool services would have to be closed during the joint use times from 8:30 a.m. until 11 a.m. Tuesday to Friday, when an average of 85 people use the facility.

“This would result in a loss of revenue for memberships and admissions,” Mroz noted.

The early-morning hours serve one of the most consistent groups of members, she pointed out, noting the users at that time are generally looking for a time when the pool is not busy.

In evaluating what would be proposed to be cut, Mroz said the city tried to propose “the greatest good for the greatest numbers” looking at when the fewest people use the pool.

“These times were reduced over the summer and there was considerable feedback indicating that these swim times were highly valued,” the report notes.

Addressing questions from council, Mroz said the Lifesaving Society, which is responsible for the national standards, has been raising standards over the last few years.

A visit to the Whitehorse facility found the standards for lifeguarding are not being met.

“We have a difficult pool to guard,” Mroz said.

The aquatic centre has numerous features (from the waterslide to the swirl pool to the hot tub along with the leisure and lane pools) that make lifeguarding more complicated than it would be at a basic rectangular-shaped single pool.

The popularity of swimming programs was evident when registration for fall programs began last Saturday morning, Mroz said.

Under questioning by council, she said a total of 600 kids are registered for swimming lessons in the city for the fall, with another 100 on wait lists.

There’s capacity for 800 youngsters to take lessons, but some programs and schedules are proving more popular than others.

Mroz said there will likely be a bit of “shuffling” around to deal with the popularity of some programs before lessons get underway.

“We’re a community surrounded by water,” Mroz said.

“We have a lot of interested people who want to learn how to swim to access the lakes. They boat, they canoe, they kayak.

“We see it as a benefit for the community, because it provides a safe way for people to be around water.”

Mayor Dan Curtis voiced his support last night, noting the importance of safety for both swimmers and city staff at the pool.

Overall, Mroz said the entire Canada Games Centre is much busier this year over past years, with approximately 100 more memberships being sold each month over last year.

That’s also meant a much busier parking lot. She hopes more patrons will begin using active transportation or taking buses to the recreational facility to avoid having to search for a parking spot.

Council will vote next week on whether to approve the funding.

Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu was absent from Monday’s meeting, the first one after council’s annual summer break.

Comments (12)

Up 0 Down 0

Struggling taxpayer on Aug 31, 2015 at 11:20 pm

Hey I got a great idea, instead of paying unqualified, tyrant of a city manager 200k + per year, that she is requesting, which by the way is making its way through the readings (if it hasn't already been passed), and put it towards the fiscal mismanagement of the pool!

What chokes me up even more, is that a couple of weeks back, I seen seven employees raking and trimming the rose bushes on the Hamilton Boulevard, lol what was the cost of that x four days??

When are they going to get it, trim the fat and save us a buck or two! OMG I wonder what next year will bring. Hold on, it's going to get way worse before it gets better!

Up 2 Down 3

Josey Wales on Aug 31, 2015 at 8:52 am

Hmm...it would appear to I, that "Krista" does not even support her own dept.
Looks like she should spend a bit more time at..."recreation and facility services".

Up 10 Down 10

north_of_60 on Aug 30, 2015 at 11:52 am

This is little more than lame excuses to get more money for obscenely overpaid CoW employees.
The pool has been in operation for many years and drownings have not been occurring, so there is no justification for funding increases other than pervasive greed among CoW employees. Every department has it's own set of excuses to beg for more taxpayer money.

The rest of us out here in the real world are not getting salary and benefit increases in the current economic situation, so why do greedy government employees feel they're entitled to special treatment?
Quit complaining and begging for more, just do your job with the resources you have, and be thankful you have a job.

Up 32 Down 0

June Jackson on Aug 26, 2015 at 7:14 pm

Mike Fradette: That is an excellent suggestion!!!

MadMaxx: Your comment is a good reminder that we don't have to take everything this Mayor / Council says at face value. I don't think closing down is a good solution, its taking it away from the public who use it.. but you are right, why do we have to buy into standards set somewhere else?
Is this council really feeding SIMA? STAR! Look into that!

Up 41 Down 0

vacant positions - use the savings from those on Aug 26, 2015 at 5:31 pm

Didn't I just hear on CBC that there were several vacant positions, with some vacant for months? There has to be budget savings from those departments, for heaven's sake just transfer some money instead of asking for more.

Up 48 Down 1

Max Mack on Aug 26, 2015 at 3:17 pm

Any "shortfall" can easily be covered by decreasing under-the-table support for SIMA.

But then again, I question the new "national standards" and whether CoW (or any swimming facility, for that matter) is obligated to follow them.

Up 68 Down 26

Mandeep on Aug 26, 2015 at 10:30 am

What about getting some money back by getting rid of the 50% discount for all COW employees + family members.
"We don't have money but we give ourselves a substantial discount!"

Up 53 Down 44

This is so bad management on Aug 26, 2015 at 9:35 am

Canada games Center has come to Mayor and Council for $20,000.
City Managers job is to know how to deal with issues like this by moving funds from another part of the City budget to cover this problem. End of story.
What a control nightmare City management works with this Mayor and Council.
Go find a life some of you.
This is so bad elected management.
Next thing will be can we upgrade the toilet paper!

Wilf Carter

Up 55 Down 2

Mike Fradette on Aug 26, 2015 at 9:26 am

I propose that the city not spend the $500k moving the Cenotaph on 2nd ave (fiscally irresponsible as well) and instead keep the CGC pool operating properly while meeting national standards and pay down city debt.

Up 29 Down 0

Joe on Aug 25, 2015 at 9:11 pm

How many managers and directors are there in the City of Whitehorse? This is ridiculous and it's time to consider some re- org and some salary and job cuts.

Up 20 Down 0

Mark Carroll on Aug 25, 2015 at 8:09 pm

Supporting recreation is an important benefit to any community, however $20,000 for 18 people is an unreasonable use of public money. I am happy to help subsidize fees for people to have access, but it is not an endless pot. I agree with June the CGC salaries are ridiculous. Good for you CGC for asking for more money before looking at how the CGC spends their budget. The city sure knows how to dole the money out. I am sure it won't be so nice when property taxes go up to pay for 18 swimmers.

Up 59 Down 7

June Jackson on Aug 25, 2015 at 4:38 pm

I am also in support of doing whatever necessary to keep the CGC and the water area's safe for everyone.
Before ElderActive more than doubled the price of a Senior admission, I used the facility every day. For many handicapped/disabled people it isn't even a choice..but a necessity. I have hopes I will be able to afford it in the new year.

CGC, unlike other sports facilities, has something to offer everyone. From the tiniest baby, to the oldest. Given the numbers of people who utilize the CGC, I have no objection to my tax dollar supporting it.

There is a limit to my tolerance though, is the CGC manager making 200K a year??

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.