Whitehorse Daily Star

September trial to decide rescue’s future

The owner of a Tagish dog rescue facility will not have to give up her dogs, at least for now.

By Emily Blake on July 19, 2017

The owner of a Tagish dog rescue facility will not have to give up her dogs, at least for now.

Graham Lang is the lawyer for a number of Tagish residents.

He filed an application for a temporary injunction asking the court to impose a limit of five dogs at the property and have them kept inside at night.

Lang argued this would provide his clients relief until a trial is scheduled in the matter for mid-September.

But last Friday, Justice Gisele Miller found that granting the injunction would cause undue hardship on Shelley Cuthbert, the rescue property’s owner and operator.

She noted it would not give Cuthbert enough time to find placements for the 60 dogs currently in her care, and that she would be forced to euthanize many of them.

“The relief to the applicants would be very short-term, and devastating on Ms. Cuthbert economically and psychologically,” Miller said.

Cuthbert opened Any Domesticated Animal Rescue and Boarding Kennels in 2012 with around 20 to 30 dogs. At its peak, the operation housed 80 dogs.

Lang said the rescue facility was an “immediate problem” when it began operating in the rural residential neighbourhood and that it has only gotten worse over time.

The Selingers own a retirement home behind the property. They say that loud barking has kept them up at all hours of the night and prevented them from enjoying their home.

As well, Stefan Landfried, who runs a bed and breakfast in the area, said the rescue operation has negatively impacted his business.

Lang added that the dogs have behavioural issues, and that dog control in all jurisdictions revolves around the eventual euthanization of unwanted dogs.

“It’s sad, but that’s the truth,” he said.

Cuthbert disputed those claims at last Friday’s hearing.

“I think there’s a lot of misunderstanding when it comes to the rescue,” she said. “I do not just take in highly aggressive dogs that will attack anybody; that’s not the way a rescue works.”

She said she provides a vital service not offered elsewhere in the Yukon, by taking in dogs that other shelters will not.

This includes working with dogs that have behavioural issues until they can be adopted into the proper home or sent to other rescues in the South.

Over the past five years, Cuthbert said, she has adopted out more than 1,300 dogs.

“There is no dog on the property that cannot go into the right home,” she said.

She added that in the rare case that a dog cannot be rehabilitated, it will be euthanized for public safety.

Since she opened the rescue, she has euthanized one dog for behavioural problems and another for health reasons.

The operation also boards and fosters dogs and will house dogs seized by the RCMP while they complete an investigation.

As well, Cuthbert has a dog catching contract with the Carcross-Tagish First Nation.

Cuthbert said she has spent $80,000 over five years in attempts to mitigate public concerns.

But she claimed an electric fence installed in 2012 became inoperable because the line kept being cut.

As well, neighbours declined a privacy fence in her backyard because “it wouldn’t look nice.”

Some level of barking is normal, Cuthbert argued, and the dogs settle down within five to 10 minutes.

But a lot of the barking, she claimed, is caused by deliberate provocation from vehicle horns, gunshots, bear bangers or “anything they can to stir the dogs.”

None of her neighbours have expressed their concerns to her directly, Cuthbert added.

Instead, they have gone to the media and filed a lawsuit, which she claims has led to harassment and community mobbing.

Cuthbert said this includes damage to her fence and threats to kill her dogs.

Her truck has been egged, she added, and garbage has been thrown at her by unknown people.

“That’s not acceptable behaviour,” she said.

“As human beings, we’re supposed to be acting like adults. Not once have these people acted like adults and spoken to me in a respectful manner, and I find that very appalling.”

She became emotional as she explained that two of her dogs had also been killed.

In 2012, a necropsy found that her dog Duke had been poisoned with anti-freeze. Cuthbert still does not know who is responsible.

Another dog died in 2013 after eating urinal cakes the Salingers said they placed against the fence to offset smells from the property, the court heard.

In November 2016, six residents – the Selingers, Landfried, the Angerers and Gerry Mcgraw – filed a lawsuit in Yukon Supreme Court to shut down the rescue operation and prevent Cuthbert from keeping any dogs on her property.

The case is scheduled for a three-day trial beginning Sept. 20.

Currently, there is no legislation outlining the number of dogs that can be kept on rural properties in Tagish or when they need to be indoors.

But according to case law, if the rescue is proven to be a nuisance, it does not matter whether its use is lawful.

“I don’t believe this shelter survives in its current form through a full hearing of this matter,” said Lang.

The likely outcome will be a permanent cap on the number of dogs between none and 10, he added.

Cuthbert, however, said that if the rescue is shut down, the community would return to major dog-to-human confrontations.

“Nobody wants to see another issue like Ross River,” she said, referencing the case of a young man fatally mauled by stray dogs in October 2015.

“That’s unacceptable in this day and age.”

Comments (8)

Up 0 Down 0

Joe on Jul 27, 2017 at 5:26 pm

Sorry Fred but it is possible to rehome that many dogs esp when litters of pups can total 12 at a time also if you were in court you would have heard Shelley say 1300 dogs have been adopted transfered out or euthanized for chronic disease get the facts straight Whitehorse star

Up 2 Down 0

Fed up Yukoner on Jul 25, 2017 at 6:57 pm

I'm sorry, there is no way 250 dogs per year are leaving there and finding homes elsewhere. It's a noble thought but it smacks more of dog hoarding than anything in my opinion. Where are these dogs coming from? If she is rehoming 250 a year that means 2 dogs are arriving at her place every 3 days and 2 are leaving. However it plays out not believing one word of it and if I was a neighbour I would be choked.
The attitude folks have about careless breeding and general neglect of dogs is pretty alarming in our territory, time to smarten up, not politically correct but somebody has to tell the truth sometime.

Up 3 Down 4

KIP on Jul 24, 2017 at 2:52 pm

How many other individuals are devoting their time and resources to helping this
issue? Shelley is not the problem! The problem is others who have neglected their responsibilities. We have the same issues with environment neglect and abuse. Humans cause the problems and expect others to clean up. The solution is simple. Crank up the taxes and build a lovely facility . Wonder if anyone will complain about their taxes being hiked.

Up 5 Down 9

KIP on Jul 23, 2017 at 6:49 am

I admire Shelley's dedication and compassion with these rescue dogs. She is only one individual obviously giving her all at making a difference for these dogs . Others have neglected to do so hence the need for the rescue. Perhaps her nagging neighbours could open their hearts and help her find solutions that
would help the situation rather then being those kind of people who back stab and talk behind others backs. The need for a rescue is inevitable. Be the bigger person and aid and give back in your community rather then sit back and watch others in need struggle.

Up 11 Down 3

Max Mack on Jul 20, 2017 at 5:25 pm

Dozens of barking dogs would quickly earn my ire. So, I can appreciate why Cuthbert's neigbours feel like they have to use the courts to enforce their preferences.

Government could intervene and offer to mediate an acceptable compromise. But, the political elite won't: partly because they don't care for Cuthbert, and partly because they feel they must protect Mae Bachur's monopoly.

In the end, Cuthbert will suffer and so will dozens of dogs in her care. Sad.

Up 11 Down 10

Josey Wales on Jul 20, 2017 at 7:52 am

I get the issue, given this tid bit...
"Cuthbert has a dog catching contract with the Carcross-Tagish First Nation"

Perhaps she is smarter than the mobs and media make her out to be?
She draped herself in the cape of political correctness, I sense a new government compound, with new bling, some staff handlers, maybe a few new trucks and her own office in the YG fortress...for meetings when in town.
Yes my grammar sucks, not a English scholar. If you cannot understand this? .....I dunno?

Up 14 Down 3

Carla on Jul 20, 2017 at 1:33 am

I hear both sides of the issue. She has a big heart to devote her life for their rescue. Then again, I couldn't handle living beside these conditions.
This makes me hold the belief that humans don't deserve dogs for pets. That should be the concern. I guess she's missing Trevor.

Up 29 Down 3

BB on Jul 19, 2017 at 4:58 pm

I remember the court case against Shelley last time around. She continued to battle the judge right to the end, rejecting any suggestion that she had done anything wrong. There is an issue with some people where they can't be wrong about anything, ever. I also have doubts about this "1300 dogs found homes through my rescue in 5 years."

That said, I appreciate Shelley's love of dogs and her dedication to them. Here's the elephant in the room: 'The Law' is not good enough when it comes to dog welfare in this territory. Maybe that is one big facet of this whole problem. Pin it all on Shelley Cuthbert, bad guy, but it's not just Shelley's shelter that's the problem. Question why it 'must' exist in the first place. Why someone like Shelley feels they have to step forward.

Bottom line: don't stop at investigating Shelley, trying Shelley in court, and shutting Any Dog .. Rescue, down. Take a good look at the garbage that goes on in this territory vis a vis dog welfare. The bad dog owners who create the problems in the first place, and the lack of action and denial of responsibility shown on the part of the government in enacting meaningful laws to stop the suffering, and to stop the conflicts based on the suffering.

Regardless of whether Shelley is right or wrong, that is where the blame squarely lies: with lousy dog owners and with a government that is determined to do nothing.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.