Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Pictured above: DARRELL PASLOSKI

Premiers have much to discuss

Canada’s provinces and territories are committed to freer trade within the country’s borders,

By CP on July 20, 2016

Canada’s provinces and territories are committed to freer trade within the country’s borders, Yukon Premier Darrell Pasloski said as provincial and territorial leaders gather in Whitehorse.

Pasloski said Tuesday the leaders are focused on a free-trade agreement that would allow provinces and territories to do business with each other in the same way Canada trades with other countries with which it has free trade deals.

The final touches on an elusive, renewed trade pact between the provinces, territories and the federal government are expected to be on the table during meetings of the Council of the Federation, which represents Canada’s 10 provinces and three territories.

“In the end, we want to see an agreement come forward because we have to ensure that when we’re trading and we’re doing business among ourselves that there isn’t more barriers there than there is with free trade agreements we agreed to with other countries,” said Pasloski.

The meetings in Whitehorse with aboriginal leaders began today and will continue Thursday and Friday between the premiers.

“It’s ridiculous you can’t buy B.C. wine in Ontario when you can buy it almost anywhere else around the world,” said British Columbia Premier Christy Clark.

Clark said the interprovincial deal is close, but only after intense negotiations.

“President (Barack) Obama says democracy means compromising even when you are 100-per-cent right,” she said.

“And what’s happened around the table is every province has been convinced they’re 100-per-cent right, but nonetheless has found a way to compromise.”

B.C., Alberta and Saskatchewan formed its own free-trade alliance, the New West Partnership, three years ago to improve labour mobility and cut bureaucracy.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is not attending the meetings, but the federal presence casts a long shadow over the talks as the premiers are also expected to discuss health care, climate change, pension reform and trade.

Political scientist Hamish Telford said the meetings allow the premiers to map strategy and co-ordinate their approaches to the federal government on often-complicated and costly issues.

“If every time the prime minister shows up to meet with the premiers and there are 13 different propositions on the table, they’ll never get anything done,” said Telford, who teaches at B.C.’s University of the Fraser Valley.

“But if they go to a COF meeting and winnow it down to one or at best two propositions or proposals, then they’ve got a position that the federal government can work with.”

One proposition that is a guaranteed will be a call for more health care funding, he said.

The federal Liberals promised to negotiate a new health accord with the provinces and territories, including a long-term deal on funding.

“I know there will be a conversation at the table of what the expectations are across the country,” said Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne.

Premier Dwight Ball of Newfoundland and Labrador said his cash-strapped province faces a spike in medical costs as the population ages.

Wynne and Clark expressed confidence a new Canada Pension Plan deal will be ratified, but likely not at the Whitehorse meetings.

Alberta Premier Rachel Notley said she will discuss the need for pipelines to tidewater along with disaster response and recovery after the recent devastation of the Fort McMurray wildfire.

The Canadian Press

Comments (12)

Up 3 Down 3

Wow there misguided people here on the facts on Jul 26, 2016 at 12:02 pm

How many of you know people in FM or have family and friends there?
I do. How many know the Premier of Alberta and what she had to go through, none of you.
This not because of climate change, any one stating that needs to talk to people in the know not out in the bush talking to trees.
I have worked on fires in Alberta with the Alberta forest services and this has taken place before, but not to this level.
It was a dry spring with a higher level of increasing the potential of fires.
Fire smart would have helped to protect the City, but nothing could have stopped it.
This is a natural occurrence of nature.

Up 3 Down 4

north_of_60 on Jul 25, 2016 at 1:57 pm

@moose
Here's a reality check on that alarmist twaddle you're flogging like a dead horse.
http://joannenova.com.au/2013/05/cooks-fallacy-97-consensus-study-is-a-marketing-ploy-some-journalists-will-fall-for/

Up 2 Down 4

ProScience Greenie on Jul 24, 2016 at 10:02 pm

The far left have grabbed onto the AGW issue and have taken it over the top so it is kool-aid Moose. You are being lied to.
When you see outright lies about it like Ms. Wright tried to tell us then you know it is about political ideology not real solutions.

Any thinking person should be outraged by such lies. Good on Groucho and others for taking her to task. While not a Denier myself there is no problem with intelligent criticism about the predictions or proposed policies. It is healthy in fact for that to occur.

We can't forget that Wright is a candidate for the NDP. That party should force her to retract that statement but doubt they will as truthfulness and science are not high on their agenda these days. That is one of the big reasons why I parted ways with the green and progressive movements.

Up 5 Down 5

Moose on Jul 24, 2016 at 11:55 am

Hey Groucho, care to cite some evidence that climate change is 'drinking the koolaid' ? If it is a conspiracy, it is the biggest one in human history with every recognized university in the western world buying into it. Not that I'm doubting your scientific credentials or ability to watch conservative talk shows....

Up 8 Down 4

Groucho d'North on Jul 22, 2016 at 4:52 pm

As witnessed here some drink deep from the Climate Change Kool-Aid. It should have a warning label on it. "May cause unquestioning loyalty to delusions"

Up 14 Down 7

Just Sayin' on Jul 22, 2016 at 3:05 pm

@ Sally Wright.

No, the fire was a result of what nature does naturally and rejuvenate forested areas. Normal people learn that in elementary school. How daft are you to believe that it was caused by climate change?! Next will you be saying people in For Mac deserved this? Really, do some research. I hope while you typed and or type your response that you realize how much strain you are putting on the environment with your electronic device.

Transmission lines require petroleum products . Electric cars require plastic casing, Lead and Zinc which comes from petroleum products and petroleum products to remove these metals from the ground...;. So, how do you propose to do all of this? Plus, let's think about the waste. How do you charge your electric car? Oh, you need electricity for that... Oh, but you could use solar, but solar requires silica dioxide for the cells and then you need a piece of equipment, petroleum based to remove it from the ground..

First Nation owned renewable energy resources; renewable energy resources is a western paradigm and I am unsure how you can state that renewable energy products should be First Nation orientated. How about instead of compartmentalizing it to a specific group which is racist you just say renewable energy where EVERYONE regardless of their culture, skin colour, race can participate. You and other people who believe in human compartmentalize and lack of education is what is wrong with the world.

Up 10 Down 7

north_of_60 on Jul 22, 2016 at 2:49 pm

The FtMac fire was directly caused by people. It did not start naturally; there were no lightning strikes. We may never know who started the fire. However it's obvious which group of people have been working to stop oilsands production, and who stood to gain the most from any disruption of the community that supports the oilsands operations.
What likely caused the FtMac fire? Climate Change...... Activists.

Up 10 Down 5

ProScience Greenie on Jul 22, 2016 at 11:29 am

It looks like the experts are saying the Fort Mac. fire was human caused. Not lightning or AGW.

AGW is a serious concern. It does not help to get more people on board to deal with AGW when far left activists like Ms. Wright make things up about AGW like in the post below. Lies and fear tactics tend to cause people to turn away. Not good.

Up 4 Down 18

Sally Wright on Jul 22, 2016 at 10:23 am

Ms. Notley, the wildfire that destroyed and downsized Ft. Mac is the result of Climate Change. A pipeline to the coast and expansion of the tarsands will only make more fires and floods. Time to pull the plug on the oil industries' subsidies, the biggest one being the Oil and Gas company's not having to clean up after themselves. We need transmission lines, electric cars and First Nations owned renewable energy projects. Time to turn this freight train around. You are in Whitehorse to do your job, so do it.

Up 10 Down 2

Yes on Jul 21, 2016 at 12:49 pm

Those right leaning BC Liberals are such socialists!

Up 10 Down 2

wundering on Jul 21, 2016 at 12:27 pm

So local contractors, and suppliers are already complaining about not getting local contracts. Local labour is complaining about not getting work on local projects, and the Premier is ensuring it will be even harder in the future.

Up 7 Down 13

jc on Jul 20, 2016 at 4:30 pm

Leave it to Cristy Clark - socialist- to give Canadians a quote from Obama. Couldn't give us anything a Canadian would say. Does she really think that Canadians are impressed with a quote from him?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.