Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

MacBride president Keith Halliday and Mayor Dan Curtis

Museum ‘saddened, shocked’ by grant policy change

Full grants of property tax are history for all museums around town.

By Whitehorse Star on May 26, 2015

Full grants of property tax are history for all museums around town.

In voting to make all museums subject to its granting policy Monday evening, council confirmed the city will no longer issue grants to museums to pay their property tax.

And that leaves the board of MacBride Museum “saddened” and scrambling to figure out how the taxes can be paid while having as little impact as possible on programming at the downtown museum.

“We’re shocked; ‘stunned,’ really, is a better word,” MacBride president Keith Halliday said this morning.

The vote comes about six months after council adopted policy changes requiring organizations that previously received grants for their taxes to pay their tax bill.

(Essentially, the city would provide a grant equal to the amount of tax owed, thereby paying the tax bill for the group.)

Last January, Halliday pointed out, council directed staff to consider MacBride’s individual circumstances as the only museum to hold title to its land and thus face the property tax bill.

Since most of the city’s other museums are on Yukon government land, any tax bill would go to the territory. The only other museums not on government property are the Copperbelt Railway & Mining Museum, and the Old Log Church Museum.

Along with a higher assessment rate for its prime downtown location, Halliday pointed out that the museum will essentially be penalized for its fundraising efforts as all its assets, including cash, are factored into the tax rate.

There will be a phased-in approach where organizations that previously received a full grant will be required to pay just 25 per cent of their tax bill in the first year, 50 per cent in the second year, and 75 per cent in the third year before taxes will be required to be paid in full in Year 4.

Council’s unanimous vote Monday to apply the policy to all museums only came after a 3-3 tie vote defeated a motion put forward by Mayor Dan Curtis that MacBride be exempt from the policy.

Councillors Dave Stockdale and John Streicker voted with Curtis in favour of exempting the largest museum in the city and the only one to have title to its property.

Councillors Betty Irwin, Jocelyn Curteanu and Mike Gladish voted against Curtis’ motion.

A tie vote by council automatically defeats a motion.

In bringing forward his motion that would exempt MacBride, Curtis highlighted MacBride’s Front Street location just behind city hall and its status as the only museum to hold title to the land it’s on as individual circumstances which make it different from other locations.

“MacBride Museum is very unique,” he said as he pointed out the prime downtown location has a significant impact on the assessment rates used to calculate taxes.

He also pointed out the importance of the city and MacBride having a good relationship, given their status as neighbours.

That’s especially significant as the city works on its building consolidation project which will see a new service building on the same property as city hall.

The mayor later argued the exemption would be a “good compromise” to deal with MacBride’s circumstances.

“It’s not black and white; there’s a lot of grey out there,” Curtis said. He made the remark while addressing comments from other council members. Some had argued city staff worked hard to come up with a policy that would be fair and equitable for all organizations

Curtis also argued that if another museum were to gain title to the land it’s on, it could come forward at that time and seek an exemption to the policy.

Stockdale stated his agreement that MacBride is in a unique situation which warrants an exemption.

Streicker said the exemption is a small price for the value the city gets from MacBride.

Irwin, Curteanu and Gladish countered those arguments by pointing to the work that went into coming up with the policy they believe to be fair.

“I do not feel this is an undue hardship,” Irwin said of the nearly $5,000 tax bill MacBride will pay this year through the phased-in approach. The full tax bill would be $27,467.

Halliday said this morning work is being done to confirm those numbers, again pointing out MacBride’s assets will be factored into the tax equation.

During last night’s discussion, Gladish pointed to the benefits all non-profits offer the city. By exempting one, the city could be seen as favouring one over others and throw out all the consultation work that was done to come up with the current policy.

“We did go through a lot of consultation,” he said, arguing the need to make policies “fair and equitable” for all.

As Curteanu said, “I think all museums are valuable.”

Comments (11)

Up 49 Down 37

Holy tax! on May 27, 2015 at 6:54 pm

Churches are also buildings with historic values. Churches no longer need their charitable status as they are getting political.

Up 45 Down 39

Max Mack on May 27, 2015 at 5:41 pm

An article about taxation for museums has brought out the religion haters.

Churches provide an incredible array and volume of social services on a completely voluntary basis. The opportunity cost of the labour alone would amount to hundreds of millions of dollars each year.

Supporting tax-free status for churches does not mean you believe in god or the sky fairy or bible myths. It means you value the enormous contribution of churches and their charity works. Grow up.

Up 117 Down 0

Stan Collins on May 27, 2015 at 1:41 pm

Did we ever hear how much it cost us when an inexperienced city manager was allowed to fire two veteran city employees without cause?

Talk around town is that it will cost us at least $500,000 to $600,000. If you look at how this funding could have been used, the city could have given 2 museums grants of $25,000 to $30,000 each year for ten years.

That is a lot of money - shame on council for continually making poor decisions!

Up 75 Down 61

steve on May 27, 2015 at 12:23 pm

You should not be taxing museums but you should tax every church and church property period!

Up 74 Down 8

Historical sites across Canada do not pay taxes on May 27, 2015 at 11:42 am

If you look across Canada's historical sites, like this museum, they do not pay any type of taxes.
It does not matter if it is Federal, Territorial, Provincial or municipal governments that are involved.
This is a bad policy, which the City of Whitehorse have developed and the three Councillors who voted for it, do not understand what it is about and don't understand the importance of history and it has nothing to do with land ownership.
History is important to all of us, especially the people who build this land like First Nations, adventurers.
Stop playing with our history. The City of Whitehorse needs to protect this history of the City and its people.
Wilf Carter

Up 86 Down 77

Josey Wales on May 27, 2015 at 10:17 am

What about our many "churches" and their tax free status?
Google religious property titles, and see for yourself how much tax free land folks as that get a break each year.
Shameful really, as non-members are subsidizing the others...what a mess eh?

Up 72 Down 10

Smurf on May 27, 2015 at 9:42 am

Another step towards the replacement of mayor and council in October!
Citizens of Whitehorse: Please wake up and finally realize into which kind of disaster will these guys lead the once so relaxed and beautiful town!
Mining is almost dead - would be smart to invest more in tourism - but that's definitely not the way...

Up 80 Down 9

north_of_60 on May 27, 2015 at 12:48 am

Of course they're going to squeeze everything they can out of museums. Somebody has to pay for all those expensive Sustainability Studies by southern experts, and the Curtis Castle on the top of the hill, and self-serving Marketing and re-branding the City Image, and doing something/anything to con people into living in Wasteland Bend.
We all know that the City budget is based on the Ben Dover system of fiscal management. He also runs the complaints department.

Up 32 Down 11

YTer on May 26, 2015 at 5:22 pm

Mick, read the article, Dan voted to exempt the MacBride
When you compare the MacBride to the other museums mentioned, there really is no comparison.

Up 140 Down 23

Mick on May 26, 2015 at 4:35 pm

That $5000 tax bill is right around the same amount the Mayor gets for his annual vehicle allowance.

Maybe Curtis can tighten his belt, ride his bike or transit and donate his allowance to McBride Museum.

Up 75 Down 10

June Jackson on May 26, 2015 at 3:27 pm

All museums are a record of our history and play an integral part in the development of mankind. Its too bad that museums are just one portion of the cutbacks the City now has to consider.

When times were good, CoW passed out money, grants and work without consideration for what might come down tomorrow. (thank Buckway for the very expensive Whistlebend.)

Times are not good at the moment and the City finds itself trying to maintain 'good times' business on bad times income. Can't be done. Everyone is tired..taxpayers are tired of constant tax hikes, youth are tired of not being able to find decent paying jobs. The poor are tired of the wealthier not being able to see how poor they are, wealthy are tired of the poor carping about how poor they are. The list of tired is pretty long. The CoW can't live within its means, or even outside of its means anymore they have accrued so much debt. Last I read, CoW was 600K in the hole. Taxing our museums are not even a drop in that bucket. Why the Museums? Why not the Mayor and Councillors wages?

YTG gave away a million dollars this week.. perhaps some of that can be funnelled down to McBride.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.