Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

STANDS BY COMMENTS – Highways and Public Works Minister Richard Mostyn says he stands by his comments and his department’s preparation of the proposed Public Airports Act. Inset: SCOTT KENT

Minister spurns demand to apologize over consultation

Opposition critic Scott Kent says Highways and Public Works Minister Richard Mostyn has misled the aviation industry and the legislature.

By Chuck Tobin on October 13, 2017

Opposition critic Scott Kent says Highways and Public Works Minister Richard Mostyn has misled the aviation industry and the legislature.

And he needs to apologize, Kent insisted in an interview this morning.

He said during question period on the legislature on Thursday, Mostyn said he had shared with the industry the draft legislation for a new Public Airports Act.

The day before, however, the minister received a letter from the Northern Air Transportation Association asking that its name be removed from a government press release indicating the association had been consulted about the new act.

The letter said it had never received any draft legislation to review or comment on, and that conversations with a senior government official were only general in nature.

“This short conversation in no way can be construed as “consultation” and the reference to NATA in the Press Release needs to be removed,” reads Wednesday’s letter to Mostyn from the Glenn Priestly, the executive director of the association.

When pressed by Kent yesterday in question period, Mostyn told the legislature the draft legislation had been shared with members of the air industry.

Kent said today the minister’s response to the legislature came a day after he’d received the letter from the association indicting it never saw any draft legislation.

The reference in Mostyn’s press release of Oct. 4 indicating the air association had been consulted about the new legislation was still up on the government’s website this morning, Kent pointed out.

The opposition critic said Mostyn needs to apologize and must go back to the drawing board with his Public Airports Act.

“It’s quite the mess they have created and they have to hit the reset button,” said Kent.

The minister told the Star early this afternoon he stands by his comments.

What Kent is putting forward is another cooked-up fabrication by the Yukon Party, he said.

“It is getting tiring,” Mostyn said. “Again and again, we keep seeing things that are incorrect that are coming out of the official Opposition, and they should start checking their facts.”

Mostyn said the draft legislation was shared with the Canadian Owners and Pilots Association on Sept. 11 and with the Yukon Aviation Advisory Group made up of Yukon companies, including Air North, on Sept. 13.

He said said he spoke with the executive director from the Northern Air Transportation Association Thursday afternoon, adding all is good.

That the association didn’t feel it was consulted is its view, but what officials heard from the association was incorporated into the draft legislation, he said.

Mostyn reiterated his comments that the Yukon is in dire need of a single piece of legislation to govern airports, something it has been missing for more than 20 years.

Now that the legislation has come forward, the next task will be to expand the consultation process to assist with the creation of the regulations under the legislation, and that is where the rubber is going to hit the road, Mostyn suggested.

Air North president Joe Sparling told the Star this week, the company was aware the government was preparing new legislation but was never well-informed about what it was going to say.

Now that company officials have seen it, there are red flags, he said.

The Yukon Party has been carrying on a frontal assault of the Liberals and their proposed airport legislation.

It has gone so far as to suggest it was a poorly veiled attempt to begin imposing an airport improvement fee.

Mostyn, on the other hand, maintains that the new act is simply meant to give the government a single piece of legislation to govern its airports and aerodromes.

Since the federal government devolved authority over airports to the Yukon in the 1990s, it’s been a hodgepodge of legislation that gives the government its authority, he has pointed out in recent days, including today.

The government press release of Oct. 4 says authority to govern airports currently comes from the Lands Act, the Territorial Lands (Yukon) Act, the Motor Vehicles Act and the Financial Administration Act.

Mostyn has insisted there is absolutely no intent to implement an airport improvement fee or tax.

See minister’s letter.

Comments (14)

Up 0 Down 0

Wilf on Oct 20, 2017 at 7:28 am

June I'm curious. Did you drive that Liberal out?

Up 0 Down 0

Arturs on Oct 19, 2017 at 7:47 pm

I would like the self assuming "Yukon Party" to apologize for the lack of quality candidates they have for forming a worthy opposition.

Up 7 Down 6

Yukoner81 on Oct 18, 2017 at 10:11 pm

So let me get this straight, the Yukon Party in 2014 gives itself the power to charge airport fees and taxes, and the airlines were perfectly fine with it. Now the Liberals transfer this exact same clause into their new airports act and the airlines cry bloody murder??? Something seems fishy here.

Up 5 Down 2

CJ on Oct 18, 2017 at 2:52 pm

I can believe the Liberals don't intend to start charging improvement fees, and I can believe Mostyn's explanation that the broad strokes of the legislation need to be put in place to prepare for regulations yet to come. But why is there accommodation for a fee now, then? Ironically, it's something the Yukon Party would leap on, should they find themselves back in power.

@Miles Ocean, it might be a small thing, but it's an irritating one. Like parking regulations when there was no security and little infrastructure in place to get to/from the airport any other way for those early and late flights. Yukon governments like the fees, they don't like the details.

Up 8 Down 2

Groucho d'North on Oct 18, 2017 at 11:32 am

PSG: There is a road tax on the fuel we buy to burn while driving on the roads. But there is no way to know if all that revenue gets spent on roads and highways. I suspect there are similar taxes on the JetB and Av-gas sales too.

Up 22 Down 6

ProScience Greenie on Oct 17, 2017 at 5:25 pm

User fees eh. Do the supporters of an airport tax/fee also support road tolls for those that use our highways and bridges?

Up 16 Down 16

Miles Ocean on Oct 15, 2017 at 5:29 pm

Airport tax = user funding for airport improvements

Why such an uproar - this is so silly

Up 42 Down 11

Groucho d'North on Oct 15, 2017 at 8:34 am

Liberals need to understand that consultation is not a bunch of them sitting around having a chat about this and that.
Apparently the federal Liberals just concluded a nation-wide consultation on immigration. Did anybody hear about it? Details here: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/immigration-levels-2018-canada-1.4347339

Up 48 Down 10

ProScience Greenie on Oct 14, 2017 at 12:37 pm

Not a fan of Scott but glad he's pushing Mostyn on this. It is pretty obvious that there was next to no consultation on this so hit the reset button and do it right with input from all stakeholders.

The Liberals campaigned on 'listening to us' so let's hold their feet to the fire on that whether you voted for them or not.

Up 47 Down 11

Nile on Oct 14, 2017 at 12:11 pm

As a former “journalist” Mostyn has always been able get away with it. I bet he thought this would carry over into his political job as well. Glad to see he’s getting caught so soon.

Up 53 Down 15

jack on Oct 13, 2017 at 10:32 pm

Someone is lying here. I doubt it's NATA or Air North.

Up 45 Down 16

June Jackson on Oct 13, 2017 at 5:55 pm

Anyone believe a Liberal about anything? I did... once.

Up 21 Down 44

Garrioch's Reliable Source on Oct 13, 2017 at 3:59 pm

More useless "he said - she said Middle School level crap" from Snivelling Scott.

Further proof that Yukon right wing politics is in desperate need of a talent upgrade.

Up 48 Down 13

And... on Oct 13, 2017 at 3:34 pm

...of course the Minister would never tell a fib or inadvertently mislead the legislature, or the public, now would he?

We must remember the Minister's background - a journalist - another honourable position in society...

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.