Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

ACTION PLAN FORGED – Mayor Dan Curtis, Kwanlin Dün First Nation Chief Doris Bill and Premier Darrell Pasloski, left to right, are seen at Thursday’s news conference.

Governments team up to stem homelessness

Three levels of government will partner on an action plan to address homelessness and help the city’s most vulnerable people.

By Stephanie Waddell on February 12, 2016

Three levels of government will partner on an action plan to address homelessness and help the city’s most vulnerable people.

Premier Darrell Pasloski, Mayor Dan Curtis and Kwanlin Dün First Nation Chief Doris Bill made the announcement Thursday morning.

Work on the action plan, including two forums to look at various issues, will happen over a one-year period beginning in April and concluding in March 2017.

The joint press conference also saw the release of a 10-page summary on what came out of two forums hosted by the city and First Nation last year on how to help vulnerable people in the city.

The action plan is a next step in the process. It would be funded by the territorial government.

As the three government leaders pointed out, it was clear from attendance (including more than 300 at the September 2015 event and 50 at the session specifically for businesses) at the two forums last year that the community is committed to working on the issue.

“We don’t want to lose this great momentum,” Curtis said, noting his hope “that we can build on what has been done.”

Pasloski reflected on his years in the pharmacy business before entering politics.

He noted he dealt with many of the city’s homeless people on a daily basis.

It was clear the issues were complicated and will take the commitment of the entire community to move forward toward the ultimate goal of ending homelessness.

“They need more than just a home,” Bill said, pointing to the numerous complex issues facing the most vulnerable people in the community.

She argued there’s a need to “work smarter” on the issue.

While there are a number of services out there, she said, a more comprehensive approach is needed so those facing a crisis aren’t forced to go from one office to another to deal with the variety of services they need. A more streamlined approach would address the unique needs of each individual.

As Bill pointed out, homelessness strikes at the core of any community.

In Whitehorse, the community showed its heart last year when a standing-room only crowd turned up at the Kwanlin Dün Cultural Centre for the first forum with the business community showing its support at the second forum.

“We must do what is morally right,” Bill said.

“We need to move from crisis responses like shelters, and soup kitchens, which are at best temporary solutions, towards meaningful goals and measurable strategies to end homelessness.”

Political leaders don’t have all the answers, Bill said.

What she and other government leaders understand though, she said, is that vulnerable people need many supports. Working on the issue is complex, multi-faceted and “by no means straightforward.”

It’s important for leaders to work with community partners to improve access to services for those in need.

“Together we must all make a difference,” she said.

The full summary report on the two forums held last year is available on the city’s website at www.whitehorse.ca

Comments (15)

Up 2 Down 2

Lost in Translation on Feb 17, 2016 at 5:05 pm

If COW would like to help, they can lower the standards for subdivisions development just for cases like this. The only way to reduce land's cost.

Up 16 Down 0

north_of_60 on Feb 16, 2016 at 4:17 pm

@PS G is correct. The real problem is the resources sucked-up by the "anti-poverty and homelessness 'industry' ". There's no accountability or documented results for the money wasted by a bunch of bureaucrats and their flunkies.

It would be far better to decimate the "anti-poverty and homelessness" bureaucracy from the top down and instead use the money to build simple, durable, utilitarian, multi-unit housing for the homeless. It needn't be fancy, just the basics. If they want better housing then they can get a job.

Up 39 Down 3

Yukoner on Feb 16, 2016 at 1:42 pm

It's not my responsibility to make sure you have a roof over your head, it's not my fault you drink and do drugs. Yes, I too drink but I work.
This antipoverty coalition is also a problem. I don't want my tax dollars paying for the useless.

Up 9 Down 4

north_of_60 on Feb 16, 2016 at 12:53 pm

Nearly all of us up-here are supported by the taxpayers of Canada. It's either directly by government wages and benefits or indirectly by the government money that trickles down through the local economy on it's way Outside.

What passes for local government is little more than a bunch of extravagantly paid bagmen for Ottawa. Is some bureaucrat shuffling papers really doing anymore to justify their taxpayer support than the homeless person living on social assistance?

The artificially high cost of housing only benefits the rich and only makes them even more wealthy. Instead, take some of those tax dollars and build simple, durable, modest, multi-unit housing for the homeless. It doesn't have to be much more than a one room apartment that they have the key to the door and can come and go as they wish.

There's really no valid excuse to keep things the way they are; it only benefits the 1% at the top at the expense of the misery of those at the bottom.

Up 9 Down 0

ProScience Greenie on Feb 16, 2016 at 11:50 am

That $500/person/week post was sarcasm directed at the anti-poverty and homelessness 'industry' that in the end costs us far more than that $2.6 million figure with their endless meetings, consultations, high wages, travel etc with next to zero results. Seeing our working class tax dollars wasted that way is just as bad as giving it to someone to go grab a bottle at the liquor store. I hate to say it but one has to wonder Yukoner, if many in the bloated bureaucracy are the real bums and leeches of society with the way they burn through our tax dollars.

Up 22 Down 3

Yukoner on Feb 15, 2016 at 2:51 pm

I can't believe the comment - give all of the 100 people 500 a week.
That is half the problem, the working class paying for the non working class.
Then even more people don't want to work and don't get me wrong there are people out there that can never work and need help. But of the hundred or so here most would and do take the money that is given to them right to the liquor store or to their favorite drug dealer. So you get a thumbs down from me.

Up 12 Down 0

proscience greenie <-- nail had on Feb 15, 2016 at 2:14 pm

urban gentrification. Rates for dilapidated properties is low. Rich investors buy them and "modernize" then the people that lived their are stuck.

Vancouver is the neatest one and very hostile. Property 1 bought by wealthy investor, property 2 is inherited, property 3 bought by wealthy investors friend. (assuming all next to one another). 1 + 3 upgrade. 2 is stuck with an increase in property tax and higher property. 2 Doesn't want to sell
1 + 3 don't allow others to buy in and go 50/50 on property 2. They eventually run down 2 so they have to sell.

Homeless don't even enter the picture.

Keep studying it

Up 26 Down 13

ProScience Greenie on Feb 15, 2016 at 10:44 am

It was said in another article that there were about 100 homeless people in Whitehorse. If you gave every one of them $500 a week cash it would add up to $2.6 million dollars annually. That's cheap in the big picture compared to the money spent by governments, NGOs, religious groups and consultants studying the issue - wages, travel, meetings, training etc.

Years ago along the riverbanks there were a bunch of little shacks with wood or oil stoves with crooked Jim Robb-style chimneys poking out of the roofs that kept people warm and safe. Now that same area is full of fancy multi-million dollar buildings and we have more homeless than ever.

While the intentions are good on the surface it is basically an epic fail by all involved.

Up 18 Down 3

Addiction and drug facility needed on Feb 15, 2016 at 10:42 am

I'd start with an addiction and drug facility:
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/medicine-hat-has-almost-eliminated-homelessness-by-giving-homeless-people-the-keys-to-their-own-apartments

Medicine hat has done amazing things with homelessness.
Problem with the Yukon is that we have different financial constraints ... and quite honestly we need more jobs that are long term.
The Yukon is boom and bust get used to it. It doesn't need to be that way. Resources are at the whim of demand (all fields are)...(except government).

Huge problem, good luck, just frustrating to think of.
I also don't believe that one group is having more of an issue with homelessness than another. Canada wide the gypsy movement/hippie movement is quite large: transients.

Up 17 Down 22

Lost in the Yukon on Feb 14, 2016 at 2:14 pm

It would be nice to believe that this will actually result in something positive because I believe the Mayor and Chief are serious. They have jumped into this game because the Yukon Party have ignored it for over ten years. Now with the threat of being tossed out of Office the Yukon Party is trying to make it look like it cares.

The reality is all they have committed to do is study this some more which means they are still not committing to doing anything and have just kicked the can down the road past the next election.

How cynical of them. Those holding memberships in the Yukon Party should feel ashamed of their leadership.

Up 28 Down 25

Yukon need a healthy families program on Feb 13, 2016 at 3:12 pm

to work on this problem before it starts. Once people are harmed it is hard for them to recover. I know homeless people and some see it as life living outside when it is warmer.
I would like to recognize the great work of the Anti-Poverty Coalition.

Wilf Carter

Up 19 Down 2

Groucho d'North on Feb 13, 2016 at 1:37 pm

I dislike speaking to generalities as each person defined as homeless arrived at their particular place and situation for many different reasons, so the appropriate solutions will not be the same for all either. For starters, the people involved will have to want their lot in life to improve before any measure of success can be claimed. Many are quite content to continue with their present lifestyle, while others will seek to make their lot in life better. But they have to decide this for themselves. Consider they are being encouraged to assume the responsibility for themselves and their continued well-being. For most this means casting off their free-style existence in favour of adhering to a work regime of some kind so that they can maintain a less than adequate level of income to pay high prices for lodging, food, clothing, medical care and all the other necessities of life. I think all orders of government will need to keep their expectations realistic and recognize they may help a percentage of those who need help, while there will be others who hear the gypsy song and are reluctant to adopt the rat-race activities that the rest of us bitch about Ad nauseam.

Up 5 Down 28

Josey Wales on Feb 13, 2016 at 7:27 am

Gee...the governments will save the homeless?
How, by laying dormant the biggest land scam since contact?
Oh I know, by having rabid parking patrols fine us all to the poorhouse..only to GIVE it to some special interest group drawing wages whilst "addressing" this issue.
The nobles could not plan a birthday party without epic cost over runs, epic incompetence, epic narcissistic back patting, epic and I meeeeaaan EPIC pandering.

in short..get ready for yet another epic round of tax increases and user fees (way too late) whilst the epic social sodomy is "moved forward"
Why we allow these morons the peace to destroy what was built...blows me away.

"As the three government leaders pointed out, it was clear from attendance (including more than 300 at the September 2015 event and 50 at the session specifically for businesses) at the two forums last year that the community is committed to working on the issue."

There ya go folks, a few thousand storming city hall SHOULD get their attention demanding tax cuts, less nobles feeding etc.
Mind you that assumption is based on the words of any political blowhole...having merit/truth.
I see neither in the two governments that Canadians can vote for.
Speaking for the dysfunction, entitlements, that an equity government is rife with?
Just lights up the moderators axe hand...so I won't.
Today.

Up 40 Down 6

yukon56 on Feb 12, 2016 at 8:57 pm

Not all want help, a lifestyle choice.

Up 35 Down 11

JC on Feb 12, 2016 at 4:55 pm

Would it not be better to teach these people how to work and find them jobs? Oh yeah, I forgot, Human Wrongs ruled that out back in the hippie days.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.