Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

HOUSING FORMS DEBATED – Property owner Randy Audette envisions a townhouse development at 11 Tarahne Way in Whistle Bend that would see a density of 36 to 40 units per hectare. The current zoning, however, allows for 50 units per hectare. Inset Steve Roddick, left, and Mike Ellis.

City staff oppose rezoning bid for townhouses

City staff have recommended that council defeat a proposed zoning application for a Whistle Bend property.

By Stephanie Waddell on July 18, 2018

City staff have recommended that council defeat a proposed zoning application for a Whistle Bend property.

It would allow for townhouses on what would otherwise be a lot for apartment housing at 11 Tarahne Way.

The recommendation on the zoning change was brought forward at Monday’s council meeting as part of a report on the public hearing about the zoning application.

Property owner Randy Audette applied for the change to allow a townhouse development that would see a density of 36 to 40 units per hectare. The current zoning allows for 50 units per hectare.

At a previous meeting, Audette argued that his plans for three-bedroom units could result in more bedrooms and thus would mean a higher density than an apartment building of two-bedroom units.

He also argued that apartment-style units – whether they be condos or rented apartments - aren’t marketable in Whistle Bend.

He has provided the city with site plans showing 36 townhouses on the site.

However, as city planner Mike Ellis informed council in bringing forward the report Monday night: “This site plan has had preliminary review, and it is uncertain if it is feasible as proposed as there are several regulations not being met that will require revision.

“Based on what has been developed elsewhere in Whistle Bend, it is likely that a townhouse development at 11 Tarahne Way would yield 25 to 35 units.”

Steve Roddick was the only person to speak at the public hearing, voicing his opposition to the proposed rezoning.

Roddick took issue with reducing the density, stating that would have an impact on transit and commercial areas of the neighbourhood.

He also questioned whether the development could even go ahead, given “disparity between the administrative review and the proposal.”

Reducing density overall could also eventually lead to the development of natural spaces further from city services.

“Additionally, it was noted that a variety of housing types creates a more complete community,” Ellis noted in his report.

“While approving the application would result in new construction in 2018, it would likely result in about 15 to 25 fewer dwelling units being constructed in Whistle Bend,” the report said.

“It is important to provide the maximum number of units possible in Whistle Bend to preserve the integrity of the neighbourhood plan, and to protect the city’s larger wilderness areas from eventual urban sprawl for as long as possible.”

Ellis went on to highlight the city’s Official Community Plan in stressing the importance of promoting more compact development in the city.

“Additionally, townhouses and apartments provide for different housing needs,” he said.

“Specifically, higher density housing can provide more affordable and/or smaller units than townhouse developments.”

Ellis then went on to note that the Yukon government’s $150-million continuing care facility is being built next-door, and apartment-style housing may be in demand by new employees of the facility.

(As the Star reported Monday, the tight housing market has seen the Department of Health and Social Services encourage its employees to considering renting premises to facility employees relocating here with no place to live. Job recruitment is continuing.)

Ellis went on in the report: “Developing a variety of housing types in Whistle Bend allows for residents of all demographics, such as age or income level, to live in the neighbourhood.

“Having numerous housing options also allows people to ‘age in place’ and remain in the neighbourhood as their housing needs change over time.”

With that, Ellis said there’s been no information presented supporting the density being increased on the lot.

With that, he put forward the recommendation that council defeat the rezoning at second reading.

The recommendation, though, raised a few questions of council.

Coun. Roslyn Woodcock wondered how long the property had been for sale before Audette signed a sales agreement. Ellis noted it had been available for six years without a buyer.

Coun. Rob Fendrick also wondered about the possibility of job losses for Audette’s staff if the project doesn’t go ahead.

While Ellis noted he couldn’t speak directly to it, he did confirm there is in general a lack of land available for development. Lots in Phase 4 of the neighbourhood are not slated to be available until the spring or summer of 2019.

Meanwhile, Mayor Dan Curtis spoke in support of the recommendation. He highlighted the overall vision for Whistle Bend and the need for a range of housing.

Council will vote on whether to defeat the rezoning at next week’s meeting.

Comments (5)

Up 6 Down 8

Bandit on Jul 19, 2018 at 8:27 am

@N_of_60
First of all, I think it is a good Idea to be able to walk to work but who says the new hires want to live in Whistlebend? Secondly, as I stated in a previous article Randy Audette is a builder not a landlord. YG, Yukon Hospital corp, H.S.S. CoW should have him build it and then takeover as the landlord. I bet there wouldn't be huge cost overruns. And to address the point of the article, there has been quite a precedent set in regards to re-zoning lately, everyone else gets it why not this one?

Up 8 Down 4

Salar on Jul 18, 2018 at 8:47 pm

Open some goddamn land!

Up 8 Down 4

Hugh Mungus on Jul 18, 2018 at 8:46 pm

@ north_of_60. Not just the continued care staff. Whitehorse needs tons of apartments to making housing available for affordable housing.

Up 16 Down 3

John Nielsen on Jul 18, 2018 at 4:54 pm

Whitehorse needs rental accommodation before it needs more townhouses. A townhouse costs significantly more to rent than an apartment. I agree that many of the employees at the care facility would rent apartments if they were there. Don't change the zoning.

Up 24 Down 4

north_of_60 on Jul 18, 2018 at 2:50 pm

WB clearly needs apartments to house the CCC staff. The municipal and territorial governments should encourage building apartments.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.