Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Dave Pruden

Bullying bylaw considered for city facilities

A potential city bylaw aimed at addressing bullying in city facilities could soon be drafted.

By Stephanie Waddell on December 8, 2017

A potential city bylaw aimed at addressing bullying in city facilities could soon be drafted.

At Monday’s city council meeting, bylaw manager Dave Pruden put forward a recommendation that council task city staff with developing a community standards bylaw for city facilities.

The proposal comes in light of instances in recent years where there’s been reported bullying behaviour at city facilities.

“In some instances, issues have involved patrons feeling bullied by other patrons and in other instances issues have involved staff feeling bullied by patrons,” Pruden explained.

He highlighted efforts done through this year to gather input and information on the issue.

It was learned that in other jurisdictions, legislation is typically adopted to deal with behaviours throughout the entire community.

Throughout the consultation in Whitehorse, officials learned there was more support for an anti-bullying bylaw that would be specific to city-owned facilities.

In working with stakeholders, including First Nations, the Yukon government, RCMP and local non-profits with an interest in the issue, Pruden said three major themes emerged.

It was clear there are issues of bullying in the community that impact youth, the elderly, vulnerable people who may have mental and physical disabilities, as well as the general public.

Involved were a number of services, including Many Rivers Counselling, the BYTE youth organization and the territory’s Department of Health and Social Services, among others.

Opinions differed on a potential bylaw, with some stating there shouldn’t be any bylaw around it, and others stating there should be.

Still others argued that while there should be a bylaw, it should only apply at city facilities, which officials are now proposing.

There were also comments that such a bylaw has the potential to “further criminalize bullies instead of getting them help,” as well as arguments that there just wouldn’t be enough resources to deal with bullying.

“A preliminary scan of the topic reveals the following when anti-bullying legislation is adopted, including:

• it provides a platform for education and compliance;

• it allows victims to be emboldened and violators to seek counselling;

• compliance is usually done by means of working to resolve the matter between the parties in a conciliatory fashion, limiting charges;

• other jurisdictions with anti-bullying bylaws see very few complaints and rarely charge anyone, so the cost of implementation would be minimal, as many reported cases in other jurisdictions are typically already criminal; and

• having anti-bullying legislation may save or even generate money as staff and patrons feel safe at city facilities; possibly there could be a reduction in staff sick time or an increase in patrons visiting facilities as they feel safer, Pruden said.

The bylaw would also likely include a provision put forward by the territorial Department of Education that in cases of possible bullying happening at school-sanctioned events in city facilities, it would be Education taking the lead on dealing with the matter.

Questioned by Coun. Samson Hartland, Pruden said the territory has a bullying policy already in place, and the bylaw would clarify jurisdiction in such situations.

Pruden also noted that the issue of jurisdiction has been reviewed by the city’s legal department.

It’s been verified that the territory would have jurisdiction in those situations.

Council will vote on whether to have staff draft the potential bylaw next week.

Comments (15)

Up 4 Down 0

Max Mack on Dec 14, 2017 at 4:12 pm

Anti-bullying, my a**. This has nothing to do with bullying. It is a bureaucrazy (spelling intentional) intent on stifling any strident complaints or opposition to wrongful regulation and city decisions. (In fairness to the city, all levels of government are getting into this manipulative game.)

Citizens have a right to be angry and hurt, and they have a right to forcefully express their opinions and frustration with city workers and managers.

Up 5 Down 0

Sigh ... nothing but a gesture on Dec 13, 2017 at 4:02 pm

The article states "other jurisdictions with anti-bullying bylaws see very few complaints and rarely charge anyone, so the cost of implementation would be minimal" ... which pretty much supports that it's a 'words only' bylaw. And BnR I agree with you - how many by-laws are on the books already that are dealt with only if someone complains (snow removal on sidewalks, rv's and boats parked on streets etc etc). To say nothing of the bike helmet by-law! Grrr

Up 3 Down 1

Karl on Dec 12, 2017 at 7:57 pm

Bullying? What about that meter maid guy who aggressively polices parking meters. You can't even park in an empty spot while sitting in the drivers seat of your car without being hassled by that guy.

Up 3 Down 0

Josey Wales on Dec 12, 2017 at 7:41 am

Hey Alan...indeed eh?
Their actions and track record illustrate very clearly to me, a great disdain for the citizenry here.

WE ABSOLUTELY NEED AN EXTERNAL 3rd party to address serious complaints and allegations of misuse of office.
I will do my best to walk the walk, seek that external 3rd party process be implemented....and do what little I can on restoring some sense of community and northern charm.
Being governed Vs. represented has been a shameful fail, bred freely the absolute arrogance we have now become conditioned to accept as normal.

Maybe Josey will morph into William Wallace?

Up 4 Down 0

Josey Wales on Dec 11, 2017 at 2:44 pm

Hey Gary...seems we have a couple things common?
We both speak freely.
I will go one step further and call for Mayor Curtis to resign, as I will this week.
He had ample opportunity to deal with a very serious matter, he choose not to.
Seems a great deal of disdain for the citizens here, coming outta our hall.
Mine is on the record, a record I desire all of the citizens to be see.

Up 7 Down 2

Gary Pettifor on Dec 11, 2017 at 8:31 am

City Bullying started with/in City Council with ex-military City Councilors in earlier 1970's. The following sentence has being entrenched in the City from before 1978 "If you go outside of the City and/or if you give the City a black eye you will be reprimanded and/or fired" All City Department Managers have used this threat to Cities employees. In 2010/2011 the City stated that they adopted a Respectful workplace policy. This is not true, OH&S legislated the Respectful Workplace policy and the City had no choice but to accept it. This policy is empty words. The only Mayor that demanded an honest and respectful workplace was Mayor Bourassa from 2000-2004. No other Mayors have demanded an respectful or honest workplace. This should be an election issue next year for both the next Mayoral and Council candidates. If any candidate does not answer questions on honesty and respectful policies they should not be elected. If Mayor Dan Curtis does not have the intestinal fortitude to demand that the City be honest and respectful in writing before next election then he should not be re elected. Also the City should never pay a lawyer to make citizens sign a letter of non-disclosure. It is our tax dollars and the only reason for City letters of non-disclosure is if the City has done something wrong. City Council must be open and honest not only in the Mayors words but in reality.
Signed Firefighter Gary Pettifor 37 year City Employee.

Up 6 Down 2

Alan Boomer on Dec 11, 2017 at 12:52 am

Are there bully bylaws that cover council meetings?

Its not readily apparent but when council does not ask questions and squirms when people go before them it usually means the people will be ignored which is kinda like being bullied.

Up 8 Down 0

My Opinion on Dec 10, 2017 at 5:09 pm

Have all you guys seen the signs taped to the Front Counters of the City Hall and the other one across from Tags? It says something along the lines of rules as how you are to address a City employee and the rights that they have. Not one thing about how they should treat me seeing as how they are working for me, that just burns me.

There was a time when these people were called Civil Servants. They are no longer Civil nor are they Subservient to anyone. We are there for them it seems. There was a time when you were approached with, how can I help you, now it is what do you want, NICE.

Up 3 Down 1

Josey Wales on Dec 9, 2017 at 2:03 pm

Dang it....forgot the not between they and do.
But y’all might’ve figured that, I dig clarity.

Up 4 Down 1

Josey Wales on Dec 9, 2017 at 1:41 pm

Hey Yukonmax....great point! Precisely the point of my first post.
This is a guise, it has more to do with keeping snowflakes staffers from getting melted.
I personally have been a big ass pain for the nobles, their unaccountability and clear public disdain for us citizens feeds me really.
Even without profanity and just with my words, all of which are freely expressed....can absolute drain the energy and heel the arrogance outta anyone whom feels and displays they are better or more important than I.
Been doing it since lil Josey first spoke, without bylaws, hate crime legislation, just ‘cause I know I matter AND I stand up proud for myself.

Up 9 Down 0

YukonMax on Dec 9, 2017 at 12:07 pm

Why doesn't this cover the public being bullied by city staff??? Very one sided.

Up 9 Down 0

Tom on Dec 8, 2017 at 5:33 pm

Now here’s the real question if this bullying bylaw passes...can department managers themselves who work in the city be charged under this bullying bylaw as there has been plenty of that going on for years too. It’s a bit ironic seeing as who the person is that is drafting this bylaw.

Up 7 Down 2

BnR on Dec 8, 2017 at 4:49 pm

Great, another bylaw that's only enforced if there are continued complaints.
What about having a zero tolerance policy for bullying, as in you bully someone, you're out of the pool. Period.
The CoW can't even enforce the bylaws it has much less any new ones.

Up 8 Down 1

Juniper Jackson on Dec 8, 2017 at 4:33 pm

I feel bullied every time CoW raises my taxes and I can't do a damn thing about it.. gonna' cut me a cheque to assuage my feelings of being bullied?

Up 8 Down 1

Josey Wales on Dec 8, 2017 at 4:04 pm

Gee...cannot help but to personally feel responsible for this attempt at shielding the nobles from their subjects. Seems they do remotely like being held to account. The term bullying is so ridiculous and better suited for elementary school.
I will give all the snowflakes at city hall a heads up, I am absolutely going to revisit the arrogance in how they handled a very serious situation with yours truly. Except this time for quality assurances, I am going to bring members of M with me....to deny the glee that clearly gave a office full of chair warmers.

This article, the proposed bylaw has like a can of spinach....given me the strength to revisit this.
Stay tuned folks as I loathe arrogant elites and as I illustrated to said unaccountable elites ...this will not stand.
So absolutely confident I am in my tenacity, I sense a shake up in the hall.

Why not pass a fiscal responsibility bylaw instead?
Rhetorical as those two terms and CoW are very diametric to each other.
OMG I am such a freaking meanie eh, empowering myself as a citizen of this banana republic.
....stay tuned.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.