Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Photo Submitted

REJECTION RECOMMENDED – The assessment board is recommending the Yukon government reject the application for the parcel of land near the commercial development at Jake’s Corner. Map by YESAB

Assessment board recommends rejection of land bid

The territory’s assessment board is recommending the rejection of another application for land near Jake’s Corner out of concern for the Carcross caribou herd.

By Chuck Tobin on July 21, 2017

The territory’s assessment board is recommending the rejection of another application for land near Jake’s Corner out of concern for the Carcross caribou herd.

The board also recommended rejection a few years ago of an application from the Yukon Fish and Game Association for land in the area to build an outdoor education camp for youth, out of concern for the caribou.

It was the same concern that prompted the board to recommend last year that an application by a placer miner to mine his claims along Judas Creek be denied.

The current application is for a 2.4-hectare parcel of land immediately south of the Jake’s Corner development for residential purposes.

“It was determined that Project would result in significant adverse effects to wildlife and wildlife habitat as well as First Nation land uses, in particular as they relate to project effects on the Carcross caribou herd,” reads Wednesday’s recommendation to the Yukon government.

“Furthermore, it was determined that the significant effects of the project to caribou, and subsequently the effects to traditional and cultural interests, could not be mitigated.”

The Yukon government has 30 days to accept, reject or alter the recommendation issued by the Teslin office of the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board.

Submissions opposing the application were received from the Carcross-Tagish First Nation, the Taku River Tlingit First Nation of Atlin and the Carcross-Tagish Renewable Resource Council.

Environment Yukon also submitted its concerns about the potential impact on the Carcross caribou herd.

The general area on both sides of the Alaska Highway north and south of Jake’s Corner serves as a migration route between the caribou’s winter and summer ranges, and also serves as a portion of the winter range.

The Carcross caribou herd has been in trouble for well over 20 years – so much so that the Southern Lakes Caribou Recovery Program was initiated in 1993 when the herd was estimated at 400 animals.

Historical research suggests the Southern Lakes caribou once numbered in the thousands.

It’s been said it was almost like Nares Mountain overlooking Carcross was alive and moving when the caribou passed through. But overhunting and alienation of caribou habitat have taken their toll.

Arguments against increased land use in the caribou range suggest alienating more habitat will have a negative impact on the caribou and the recovery efforts.

The Taku River Tlingits, however, also argue the land in question is part of their traditional territory that is still subject to an unsettled transboundary land claim that has been on the books since 1983.

Allowing further development would be an infringement on their aboriginal rights and title to the land, says the submission from the Taku River Tlingits.

“Each year, more and more TRTFN Traditional Territory in the Yukon is lost to development or otherwise removed from future settlement consideration,” reads the First Nation’s submission.

“The TRTFN simply cannot consent to new projects with large footprints of disturbance, especially those with unreasonable impacts upon TRTFN aboriginal title – including the right to exclusively use and occupy the lands in question.”

The submission says if the assessment board were to recommend approval of the land application, the approval would pre-empt the Yukon government’s commitment to provide interim land protection over the Tlingits’ traditional territory in the Yukon.

The commitment, says the First Nation’s submission, was made in March in a letter to Louise Gordon of the Taku River Tlingits.

Premier Sandy Silver was unavailable today to discuss his government’s commitment to provide interim land protection; whether the intent is to provide a complete or partial withdrawal of the traditional territory from future land use applications.

In early May, for instance, the government implemented a no-development zone along the Alaska Highway corridor north and south of Jake’s Corner, including the land being applied for.

The government’s land branch notes the creation of the no-development zone in its submission to the assessment board.

The submission says the no-development zone will be in place for 12 months, during which time no applications for land inside the zone will be accepted.

The submission from the Taku River Tlingits also says the one- or two-kilometre stretch along the highway on either side of Jake’s Corner has significant economic and social development potential.

If ever the First Nation were planning on developing a property along the highway corridor to direct tourism traffic toward Atlin, the very parcel of land being applied for would be the perfect location, says the submission.

Comments (9)

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Jul 28, 2017 at 12:14 am

Gee stu...really must be a chilly summer eh?
Cuz I think maybe Hell just froze over? Seems on this day in regards to the 'bou....we agree.

Stu I am not trying to shock anyone. If I tend to trigger ya often?
Just adjust your sensitivity level from default snowflake...to say a factory mars?
...as ewe were, stu. OJW duly notes this time correct, and not just because of agreement.
As I am not always right, I try my best to entertain when I screw up...but that happens even less than us agreeing.
Gee stu if the critters can tolerate traffic and buildings...the goings on of us? Why does it seem as though folks cannot tolerate a tad of dissent, and politically correct sans participation in discourse?

...I have one more opinion, the critters? They are far smarter than we are, and have forgot more of tolerance than we will ever comprehend despite our arrogant virtue signalling.
Hey folks that peruse...let us try something? If you feel the need to reply to whatever OJW has to say good bad or the ugly. 1-5 scale for comprehension with 1 being WTFJ? 5 being, oh yeah...I get it!
See how that may improve everyone's ability to both tolerate and communicate on current events.

Up 1 Down 0

stu nanson on Jul 26, 2017 at 9:03 pm

Lots of caribou use an area a few clicks from there towards town.
Have seen griz bears and lynx close to there.
Think the caribou could handle the lot.

Up 10 Down 0

Groucho d'North on Jul 25, 2017 at 5:48 pm

It's a sad commentary of our times when the options of refusing the application come down to: A) Protecting caribou habitat based on vague bio-data, or B) interfering with the land granting process to prevent giving a business advantage to a particular applicant despite how modern Land Claim treaties are being interpreted. Hold your nose the BS is getting deep.

Up 6 Down 3

unreal on Jul 24, 2017 at 2:52 pm

dear Kraka,
"I've traveled this road a hundred times over the past 10 years, I have never ever seen anything that resembled a Caribou." Okay, so the signage doesn't depict a true caribou, I agree, but are these the ones you are looking for and don't see in the wild?

It is rare to see them along that stretch in the summer but in the winter, I see them very often, road-killed ones too!

Up 16 Down 2

Max Mack on Jul 24, 2017 at 1:27 pm

It is unclear how such limited use of land would result in "significant adverse effects to wildlife and wildlife habitat as well as First Nation land uses".
As I've said before, "no impact" is not a realistic goal.

Perhaps the real agenda is that the First Nation is determined to prevent any commercial or industrial competition.
YESAB has lost their way.

Up 11 Down 17

moe on Jul 22, 2017 at 11:00 pm

I don't believe for one second that somebody wants to live at the junction of two highways. 'Residential use' - 6 acres of land, listening to trucks and cars slowing down to turn. Doubtful.

I think another person with a good nose for turning up freebies for them self has decided to put in an application, why not? Might get something.
I also agree with the Taku Tlingit that if anybody gets a free piece of highway (read commercial), land in that area, it should be them, and for the reason they suggested.

Up 25 Down 15

Kraka on Jul 22, 2017 at 8:56 pm

I've traveled this road a hundred times over the past 10 years, I have never ever seen anything that resembled a Caribou. Garbage rational!

Up 26 Down 8

yukon56 on Jul 22, 2017 at 3:56 pm

As long as FN have guaranteed income no development will occur, the death of the middle class and tax base.

Up 26 Down 10

jc on Jul 21, 2017 at 9:24 pm

Well. The caribou win again. Ah, to be an animal in today's world.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.