Whitehorse Daily Star

Affordable housing money used for another purpose

The Yukon Anti-Poverty Coalition and the opposition parties have lined up to denounce the government’s move to inject $1.4 million of Northern Housing Trust money — originally earmarked for affordable housing — into green energy incentives for homeowners.

By Christopher Reynolds on December 16, 2014

The Yukon Anti-Poverty Coalition and the opposition parties have lined up to denounce the government’s move to inject $1.4 million of Northern Housing Trust money — originally earmarked for affordable housing — into green energy incentives for homeowners.

The Whitehorse and Yukon chambers of commerce offered a limited endorsement, but echoed critics questioning how the plan directly addresses the Yukon’s housing shortage and high rents — both obstacles to attracting people and encouraging spending in the territory.

The government said the “good energy residential incentives program” will improve home energy efficiency and reduce both utilities bills and greenhouse gas emissions.

Bill Thomas, the co-chair of the anti-poverty coalition, remained unconvinced.

“I’m all for incentives for achieving energy efficiency and reducing greenhouse gases, but it seems to me the government ought to be looking for other funding for that ... and take the original intent of the Northern Housing Trust to heart,” he told the Star Monday.

“I really strongly encourage them to kind of suck it up and start working on the physical housing needs which are still critical in the community.”

Thomas, like the commerce chambers, noted the long wait lists for social housing and seniors’ housing.

“The announcement is really about energy efficiency. It’s not a residential housing thing.”

The incentive plan, building on the government’s Good Energy Rebate programs, offers subsidies to homeowners on nine products that improve thermal enclosures or generate energy from renewable sources.

These include heat-recovery ventilators; EnergyStar windows and doors; and solar, wind, hydro, biomass and geothermal energy generators.

The program is being unrolled under the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, not the housing portfolio.

Minister Scott Kent told the Star today it will “assist people on that part of the housing continuum” — current and soon-to-be homeowners.

“We feel it will benefit not only the homeowners but also have significant implications for the environment and for the economy.

“There were no stipulations as to what this money was for,” he added.

Thomas disagreed: “The housing trust was for housing. It’s for housing; it’s not for their own interpretation.”

Established by the federal Finance department in 2006 to “help meet short-term pressures with regard to the supply of affordable housing in the North,” the $300-million trust is not prescriptive on how specifically the cash should be doled out.

The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. defines affordable housing in part as 30 per cent or less of a household’s gross income.

“Utilizing the CMHC definition ... we have many families in both Whitehorse and rural Yukon living well beyond their means,” the Whitehorse and Yukon chambers of commerce wrote in a letter to the government in October.

“We definitely want to see the available funds expended soon and in a way that effectively addresses the real need for affordable rental units.”

Rick Karp, the president of the Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce, told the Star today that “we support programs to improve energy efficiency ... but do we use the Northern Housing Trust money for that, can we make that connection?

“It will lead ultimately to affordable housing rates over the long term. But we need some greater definition,” he added.

Karp said cheaper rental housing would make the Yukon a more attractive place to work and settle, giving the example of a Newfoundland resident he spoke to who was thinking about moving to Whitehorse.

“And when they were comparing rental rates ... they were saying we’re not going to have any money for down payments on a home because it would all be sucked up in rent.”

The vacancy rate in apartments that rent for $1,000 or less is 2.3 per cent, according to the Yukon Bureau of Statistics — “far below the 7.1 per cent continually referred to by your government,” the commerce chambers’ letter states.

“We find it perplexing that a debate continues as to whether or not there is a shortage of affordable housing in the Yukon.”

NDP Housing critic Kate White approved of supporting green energy upgrades, but not using cash designated for struggling families.

“If it was the government funding it out of pocket, I would say it’s all good. But when we’re talking about this money that was earmarked for affordable housing, there’s far too many people in the Yukon who don’t have a stable roof to live under,” she said in an interview Monday.

“We have multiple people in not a big enough space. We have people who worry about making ends meet, we have people who are living in substandard conditions.

“What about all these people,” she asked.

In the house, White called for the government to fund the green subsidies with government funds rather than the Northern Housing Trust.

Liberal Leader Sandy Silver characterized funding the energy incentives with housing trust money “another poor decision by the Cathers-Pasloski government.

“It doesn’t matter if you’re born and raised here or come from away ... that’s the hardest thing for a family to do, to get solid housing here and sink roots into the community.

“Yukon Housing did sit on this (housing money) through the worst housing crisis since the Klondike Gold Rush,” Silver added. “You can’t tell me that this is their best idea for affordable housing.”

Silver opened the legislative session in October by calling for the resignation of Brad Cathers, the minister responsible for the Yukon Housing Corp., due to ongoing affordable housing issues in the territory.

He noted then the government was still sitting on $11.5 million of the $17.5 million in Northern Housing Trust monies it received from Ottawa in 2006.

The Klondike MLA has also pointed to last June’s last-minute cancellation of a 75-unit affordable housing plan.

Since then, the Yukon government has allocated $3 million from the Northern Housing Trust fund toward a Salvation Army shelter expansion and transitional housing project in Whitehorse — neither of which qualify as affordable housing, according to opposition parties.

As a defence, Premier Darrell Pasloski has pointed out the government’s work with Kaushee’s Place to create Betty’s Haven, a $4.5-million 10-unit, second-stage housing complex for women and children exposed to violence that opened last fall.

Six affordable housing units worth $1.4 million are also slated for construction in Carmacks and Carcross.

The new residential housing program will come into effect on Jan. 1, 2015.

“The Good Energy Rebate program will continue to provide incentives for the purchase of high-efficiency home heating systems and appliances,” the government stated in a release.

“Since 2007, the popular Good Energy Rebate program has successfully delivered over 10,000 rebates to Yukon residents, displacing 29,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, saving 17 million kWh of energy and resulting in a cost savings of $15.3 million.”

Comments (15)

Up 1 Down 0

Bonus for Senior Management on Dec 22, 2014 at 4:31 pm

How many senior managers in Government have received bonuses in the last ten years? How much money was spent on bonuses to senior management? Who approves the bonuses for senior management or does senior management write their own cheques. Senior management can receive bonuses but affordable housing can't be built. People of the Yukon did you get your government bonus this year?

Up 8 Down 9

Groucho d'North on Dec 20, 2014 at 10:12 am

I think everybody is getting caught-up in the NDP's zeal to spend money. For the past year government and a number of community based organizations have been working together to develop the Housing Action Plan. I suspect that will require some funding to make it work. It's the middle of winter so nothing will be constructed for the next few months at least. So what's the urgency to spend the remaining money?

The NDP have proven a number of times in the past that they are not good money managers, so why let them create some false panic to spend money that will have a greater purpose in a few months?

Up 19 Down 0

Project Management - Wilf Carter on Dec 19, 2014 at 3:45 pm

I just read a piece in another paper about comparing F-35 to COW planned project.
What I am writing is not for or against the COW planned major project but to make the facts straight on this type of project so people of COW are not misguided by information that does not lay out the facts of how project management is done on projects like what the COW has proposed.
> Project costs like the COW has put forth means, land, services, and buildings not financing, interest charges, furniture etc.
> First the COW has most of the furniture they need and might need to purchase more for the new buildings.
> Financing cost for the COW project should be the same rate as the YTG 2.5 to 2.8% not 4%. A lot of difference.
> Sell of existing land would mean more potential high density housing available downtown COW.
> COW need more high density housing like condo's.
> Condo's that are owned as single family housing.
> Higher density housing brings cost of housing way down from single family housing.
> It also can reduce operating costs by 30% or more.
> High density housing in the down town could be for:
> Seniors close to shopping,
> Single couples.
> Single parents.
> Affordable housing.
> singles who want their own home but want low maintenance.
> Purchase for rental units as an investment.
> Some of the benefits would be:
> Would mean less people required to travel down town to work because they live downtown.
> More tax revenues for the COW.
> More cost effective delivery of services because of density.
> More people living in the downtown means more business for restaurants lets.
> It is good business practices when developing infrastructure like buildings in a cold climate is to integrate services because of the following reason:
> More energy efficient designed buildings to lower energy costs.
> Over 25 years major cost recovery on energy to the COW.
> Remember earlier this year Councillor Irwin talking about the $200,000 increase in energy costs.
> Less buildings means much more energy cost saving and maintenance.
Before this project goes ahead I would have a cost benefit analysis completed so the residents of the COW can see the full picture and understand what it means to the COW.
There is a lot of back lash by the COW people against this project.
Second if this project does go ahead the COW should put out proposal for a housing projects only on those lands and for the above reasons.
Especially where the COW want to solve the affordable housing issue.
They could ask maybe the YTG to provide some Northern trust money to lower financing costs to home owners on mortgages. not the developers.

Up 11 Down 0

When you look at the prices on mobile homes on Dec 18, 2014 at 7:27 pm

When you look at prices of mobile homes they are certainly affordable. Just need affordable land to go with it.

Up 17 Down 7

north_of_60 on Dec 18, 2014 at 3:44 pm

@Moose

"Cathers will do everything in his powers to spend the NHT money with one caveat: Whatever action is taken can't do anything to lower rental rates in city. "
But of course, a lot of the landlords are senior government bureaucrats, long term members of the OBC, and they always protect and take care of their own first.

I can remember when the Yukon was a nice, friendly, hospitable place to live. At that time, those who failed in the private sector went into the govt. Those people have now risen way above their level of incompetence, and they run the YTG 'gong show' for the exclusive benefit of the OBC. In their minds the 'little people' are just an expendable resource to be preyed upon for profit.

Up 13 Down 1

Northern Housing Trust on Dec 18, 2014 at 1:46 pm

Northern Housing Trust was left open ended by the Federal Government so the Yukon could invest it strategically in whatever it felt was in their interest and the investment would be determined by Yukoner's. The big issues in 2006 was that there was a need for an investment by the Federal Government of $150 million into housing in the Yukon. Just take a broader look at the housing needs for housing, seniors over 300 units in the next 10 years, affordable housing no real number but I did one in 2006 and it was at the bottom end of the scale 330 units in COW and another 40 in the communities. But some believe it is much higher. No one has a real number on how many affordable housing units are needed in the COW. Until some one gets a number on how many affordable housing units needed in COW how can a affordable housing plan be developed to solve the problem. You can't make a plan until you know how big it really is. All this talk by all three parties are just hot air and doing nothing to solve the problem. There has to be a needs analysis on the types of housing the Yukon needs and what are the issues in the way to solve it. This same issue was around 25 years ago and no one has created the big picture to determine what the over all needs are for housing. Talk is cheap but actions show the facts.

Up 15 Down 6

worker bee on Dec 18, 2014 at 11:48 am

Last week 4 of the people who stayed with me were looking for jobs and a place to live. After a week I found one of them a small bachelor apt. Another one found a roommate needed advertisement on Kijiji and moved to Riverdale. The other two are sleeping on friends' couch. Only one found a job. They all said the same thing. The rent is too expensive considering what the wages being offered is. What I am hearing from YTG Ministers is that the Yukon is a great place to live, work, play and raise a family. Well try telling a friend of mine that who often uses electric heaters to heat her trailer with because she can't afford pad rent and heating fuel from the same pay cheque. She will worry about the electrical bill after Christmas. It's these people who would benefit from the Northern Trust money. And small business owners would benefit from having a steady supply of willing workers. How can any reasonable Gov't not support affordable housing? I challenge the Minister and the members of Reality Association to think for a moment about the friendly young person who hands you your coffee/food and change through an open window at - 20C or the person who helps you find something in Superstore or Canadian Tire what type of housing are they going home to tonight because you didn't listen to the YAPC last June. Keep up the good fight Mr. Thomas.

Up 12 Down 3

Moose on Dec 18, 2014 at 11:07 am

Cathers will do everything in his powers to spend the NHT money with one caveat: Whatever action is taken can't do anything to lower rental rates in city. They've spent money on the Sally Ann (which is good, but not the right pot of money) which won't do anything for affordable rentals, green energy incentives for homeowners, once again a good thing but only gives a hand out to those who already own their homes.....nothing for renters. Where will the money be diverted to next? We can only be sure that whatever is done will do nothing to bring down rental rates as this would anger those pulling Cathers strings from behind the curtain.

Up 16 Down 3

Tater on Dec 17, 2014 at 4:08 pm

So, 6 units for $1.4 mil or a bit over $200,000 each appears to be a definition of "Affordable housing". But I suppose if you take into consideration that they need 3 bedrooms, finished basement, 5 appliances minimum, 2 and a half baths, hardwood floors or thick carpet, fenced and landscaped yards (maintained by Govt) and so on then it fits.......

Up 28 Down 4

Steve on Dec 17, 2014 at 1:21 pm

My brother started out buying a mobile-home and graduated to a house. That is the best way to go. Too bad, so sad for the realtors and developers if they don't like it.
As for this government, if you voted for them I'd be embarrassed to let anyone know.

Up 28 Down 8

Yukon Party Needs a new leader on Dec 17, 2014 at 8:36 am

Yukon Party hold an AGM and pick a new leader before this guy destroys everything the Yukon Party has worked for.

Up 19 Down 17

Northern Housing Trust on Dec 17, 2014 at 8:31 am

The Northern Housing Trust was not set up just for affordable housing. The Northern Housing Trust can be used in other areas.

Up 41 Down 5

north_of_60 on Dec 16, 2014 at 6:07 pm

If the government wants to make housing more affordable for hard-working people, then they should build mobile-home parks with subsidized pad rental, and give working people low interest loans to buy energy-efficient manufactured homes. There is no lack of available land.

That would have the additional benefit of driving down high pad rents charged.

Too many people believe that 'affordable housing' means free housing for the chronically unemployed. That's a bad investment of tax dollars. Instead give hard working people a hand-up.

Up 24 Down 4

Hmmm on Dec 16, 2014 at 6:04 pm

YHC canned all its experienced staff and is left with an empty shell. Just check out the experience of the current directors and vp at housing corp and its not hard to see why there are no housing initiatives moving forward. Time to move the "corp" into a department, scrap the high paid board and president and put the money towards affordable housing. The Minister needs to receive advice from people who know housing.

Up 67 Down 3

June Jackson on Dec 16, 2014 at 3:56 pm

Not that I like anything this government does..nor can you believe anything they say.. but.. affordable housing..who is it for again? What does the Coalition consider affordable? I don't like this injection of money into green energy..the Con party need their windows reno'ed before they are voted out? but I didn't like the housing plans either.

I watched NorthBeat and maybe trailers are the way to go for entry level homes. High pad rents is still a problem but, if the land is there homes can be bought for under 90K. That sounds a lot more affordable than 2-3-4-5 hundred K.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.